Legal analysis: First, fully implement the "three regulations" into the study of the theoretical central group of the Party Committee, the "three meetings and one lesson" of the Party branch, political rotation training, business training and warning education, and the "top leaders" of all units will give training courses to explain the importance of strictly implementing the "three regulations", dispel ideological concerns and enhance ideological consciousness.

The second is to make a work warning typesetting of "leading cadres shall not interfere in judicial activities and intervene in the handling of specific cases" and place it in a prominent position in the office building of the sub-bureau, always warning the police to be self-disciplined and reminding visitors to consciously dispel the idea of face-to-face inquiry and intercession.

The third is to check the police's implementation of the "Three Provisions" to prevent judicial intervention through the evaluation of law enforcement files, and to check whether the case-handling unit or case-handling personnel fully and truthfully fill in the "Record Form for the Implementation of the" Three Provisions "and other items 12, and further urge the police to handle cases in strict accordance with the law and regulations.

Fourth, party member cadres are explicitly required to report on the implementation of the "Three Provisions" at democratic life meetings or organizational life meetings, carry out self-analysis, and incorporate the implementation of the "Three Provisions" into the assessment system, annual assessment, promotion and evaluation of the responsibility system for building a clean and honest government, and effectively weave the system network to prevent interference with the "Three Provisions" of the judiciary.

Legal basis: Several Provisions on Further Regulating the Communication between Judicial Personnel and Parties, Lawyers, Special Relationships and Intermediary Organizations.

Article 2 Leading cadres at all levels should take the lead in observing the Constitution and laws, safeguarding judicial authority and supporting judicial organs to exercise their functions and powers independently and impartially according to law. No leading cadre may ask the judicial organ to handle a case in violation of statutory duties or legal procedures, and may not ask the judicial organ to do anything that hinders judicial justice.

Article 3. The organ in charge of leading judicial work can understand the case according to the working procedures, organize research on judicial policies, coordinate the handling according to law, urge the judicial organs to perform their duties according to law, and create a fair judicial environment for the judicial organs, but it is not allowed to make specific decisions on the admissibility of evidence, the determination of facts and judicial decisions.

Article 4 The judicial organs shall exercise their functions and powers independently and impartially according to law, and shall not carry out any requirements of leading cadres that violate legal duties or legal procedures or obstruct judicial justice.

Article 5 Judicial personnel shall comprehensively and truthfully record the intervention of leading cadres in judicial activities and the handling of specific cases, so as to leave traces throughout the process and have evidence to check.