All-rounder undoubtedly means excellent performance in all aspects, so education must be cultivated. What's the point of education if all the generalists are abandoned? If a generalist is proficient in all majors in college, he will be a compound talent after entering the society. The development of a country or an enterprise needs a compound talent, which is very rare. Cultivating more generalists must be the wealth of our society.
A professional should mean that he is outstanding in a certain aspect, or even that he may make special achievements in this aspect in the future. Therefore, education should cultivate him in any other aspect, whether it is art, literary talent or other aspects. Nowadays, enterprises stress specialization and innovation, but talents should also stress specialization and innovation. Not everyone is excellent in every subject, which is destined to belong to only a few people, but for students, if they have the potential to develop in their own majors, why should our education be rejected? Professionals are also related to our present society. For example, some writers are talented in literature, but not in mathematics. If our education is not cultivated, where can we get great writers?
All-rounders are rare, and professionals can't give up. The champion of Jiangsu college entrance examination played a very good role in the college entrance examination. Maybe her history is a little weak, but she can get the liberal arts champion in Jiangsu, a strong education province. Then she is definitely a rare talent. I missed the entrance examination of Tsinghua Peking University, which is excellent in all aspects. It's really not worth it. Education should not bury such talents. Even in the future development of education, we can train professionals and all-rounders in universities, recruit students and educate them separately, and then serve the country we are fighting for.