As Mr. Wang said, many of our teachers take their own requirements and subjective wishes as the starting point of their work. We have a standard and a goal in mind first, and then start from here and ask students according to this goal. When students meet our requirements, we think that education is successful; If we can't meet the requirements, we usually don't analyze why the students can't do it, let alone doubt whether our requirements are reasonable and appropriate, but blame the students blindly. The meaning is simple: "You must meet my requirements." This is a typical subjective teacher-centered idea. I am ashamed to read Mr. Wang's analysis. I have had such an experience. It is often counterproductive to ask students to do what I ask. Because the situation of students is completely different now, parents now either force their children to study or bribe them to study; Faced with such students, teachers will regard education as "carrying out my (in fact, basically superior) ideas", which will inevitably hit a wall everywhere, because students now will not buy the teacher's account. This is the current reality and we must face it.
Today, if we want to be qualified class teachers, we must learn a new educational concept-taking students as the starting point. In other words, we can't always ask students from our own goals, but learn to guide them to our goals one by one according to their specific conditions (of course, the goals should be demonstrated and scientific and reasonable). This goal should be similar and vary from person to person. Teachers should be the ones who guide the direction, not the ones who set the one-size-fits-all indicators.
As Mr. Wang said, "We must understand that children are not tools to realize our strategic deployment. They are independent individuals and have the right to choose their own way of life. Compulsory education is compulsory, which means that children must go to school, but it does not mean that children must complete the indicators of parents and teachers. Society has the right to force children to learn knowledge and improve their quality, but it has no right to force children to reach a one-size-fits-all standard. This is anti-scientific and therefore impossible. "
5, so, to "take students as the starting point", first study the child clearly, see what material he is, ask him how to arrange it in the future, and then make the best use of the situation to improve his quality as much as possible. I think only by starting with students' personalized real thoughts can we touch students' heartstrings.