However, the phenomenon you mentioned does exist. In order to make the house sell well, the real estate developers will negotiate with the local government to bring the housing into the school district, but if it is far from the leading schools, it will inevitably be far-fetched. If the education group is promoted by joining schools, some obvious factors will be avoided, so that property buyers will rush to buy houses with the reputation of leading the group in running schools. From this perspective, this is a marketing tool and a government policy to support the real estate industry.
Hello, I'm a chemistry teacher. Regarding the collectivization of education, I just express my views.
Education tends to be collectivized and looks a lot more formal. Capital participation in education, investment to make money, and investment in many educational facilities at the same time seem to improve the level of education and teaching, but it is not entirely the case. Then, after the collectivization of education, is it good for education itself?
Not necessarily beneficial, but sometimes harmful. Education is not only hardware equipment, but also good teachers, excellent management system, one or several excellent moral systems for cultivating students, scientific learning and training system, open mind and determination to reform. Mei Yiqi put forward in the inaugural speech of the President of Tsinghua University that "a great scholar is not a building, but a master". He emphasized the importance of famous teachers in schools, but he had two different views on them. Some famous teachers just have a good reputation, excellent evaluation of classes, and a lot of certificates, but the teaching effect is not good; There are also famous teachers who teach outside all day to make money, but regardless of the students in their own schools, to put it bluntly, they are businessmen; However, few people are famous teachers who have reached a high teaching level and achieved outstanding teaching results. Most teachers are unknown and dedicated, not famous teachers. After the collectivization of education, many so-called famous teachers are hired with high salaries, but they may not get any good results.
Capital is naturally profit-seeking, and the schools invested by capital are basically prestigious schools. After capital is injected into prestigious schools, they will open branch schools, recruit students under the banner of prestigious schools, and then invite teachers from prestigious schools to attend classes, so that they can earn double wages. However, when they charge students tuition fees, they charge them according to the standards of prestigious schools, as well as school selection fees, school uniforms, books, bed sheets, accommodation fees, heating fees, meals and so on. A large number of fees make capitalists earn a lot of money and make capital appreciate indefinitely. As for the improvement of the enrollment rate, we just avoid talking about it, just bombard it with advertisements, or in order to obtain a steady stream of students, we will not hesitate to modify the data and exaggerate it at will.
After the capital is invested in the school, it is to encircle the students and collect money, not to really cultivate them into talents. Although group education can bear the burden more and make things more peaceful, it is always not so reassuring, and many people don't know that they have been cheated until they have finished reading, but it is too late-you have graduated and all the money you should pay has been paid.
Therefore, the collectivization of education is the result of capital investment in education, and it also makes education more and more utilitarian, which is far from educational reform and students' ability, because the purpose of capital is very simple. I went there to make money, not for anything else.
What do you think of the collectivization of education? Welcome everyone to speak.
Education collectivization ~ the ideal is full and the reality is very skinny!
Educational collectivization is a form of implementing balanced education. The original intention is good, so that all students can enjoy quality resource education. But education is an accurate process of idea+carrier+approach, and it is also an educational chain formed in several years or decades. This is by no means a baton that can be done overnight!
The fetters of education collectivization are now prominent;
1. The responsibilities and rights of educational groups are not well defined.
2. Leadership of education groups.
3. The blood-enriching mechanism of the elite team diluted by the education group is absent.
There is a hole in the eye!
I am an educational researcher. Let me answer your question.
Educational collectivization is a new form of educational development, a general trend and supported by the government. Running a school in groups can concentrate the advantages of running a school, create a coordinated development of regional education, and let more people enjoy fair educational resources. To some extent, it weakens the negative impact of the school district housing problem and the difficulty in choosing schools.
In addition, the schools run by the group may all be private schools, but they are not. A considerable number of schools run by groups are public schools or private government-funded schools. Parents must be clear when choosing a school. There are also great differences in different schools, charging standards and teacher employment standards. Just because several famous schools under an education group think that all the schools under the group are good schools, this "brand effect" is very easy to confuse parents. When choosing a school, in addition to the group's previous school-running cases, you can also browse the education group's requirements for recruiting teachers and school-running ideas on the recruitment website.
As for whether ordinary schools will introduce the idea of a good education group, the answer is yes. If the market enters the education industry, it will inevitably lead to the survival of the fittest. If a school does not think about change and sleeps in the past, it will eventually be buried in the historical trend in the era of education groups. Schools, parents and students should learn to ask the market for answers.
Education collectivization is a trend, but keeping up with quality is the right way.
Education collectivization should be a direction of future development. The advantages within the group are complementary, the strengths are different, and the personnel exchange is flexible and convenient, which can greatly promote the development of education to a higher level!
Quality education resources are well distributed in groups.
I don't quite agree with the synonym of private schools. In order to charge high tuition fees, they adopt the teaching method of cutting leeks and filling in forms. It will be better to obey several grades, but they don't know how much progress their lives have made. Education needs to be discussed realistically. Please don't always guide most people with good grades to be unhealthy, and look forward to teaching reform.
Running a school in groups can be simply understood as an educational consortium composed of two or more schools. Through this survey, combined with my own thinking on running a school, there are three modes for the group-run school industry: one is the education group; Second, the education alliance; The third is the education sector. Therefore, the three modes can coexist. According to my own understanding, I will report three modes of running a school as follows:
I. Education Group
Education Group is an integrated school-running model with an established and high-quality school as the core and one or several affiliated schools (generally including private schools). The school sites of several schools are relatively independent, and the school legal person, personnel and finance also exist independently in form, but the school-running concept and operation mode are unified, mainly because the school management is highly unified, and several affiliated schools should serve the core schools. Example: Shanghai Xingzhi Middle School is the first public ordinary high school in Baoshan District, Shanghai. The scale of running a school is eight-track system. According to the regulations, the number of students enrolled each year is 320 (the maximum class size is 40). Xingzhi Middle School enrolls students for Baoshan District, and the scale of running a school is difficult to meet the demand of high-quality students in Baoshan District. The number of students enrolled, especially the number of students choosing schools, is strictly limited. If Xingzhi Middle School exists independently, it has reached the peak of running a school in this area. Its affiliated Hangzhong was transformed from the school-run factory of Xingzhi Middle School. Xingzhi Middle School purchases land and implements the construction of private complete middle schools. The middle school principal in the bank is a vice president of Xingzhi Middle School. The unified management of the two schools has solved the problem that relatively outstanding junior high school graduates can't reach the admission score of Baoshan Xingzhi Middle School. In addition, in the name of Xingzhi Middle School, Xingzhi No.2 Middle School was founded by the society, which is an independent private junior middle school. The headmaster of the school hired the retired headmaster of Xingzhi Middle School. The school-running concept and teaching mode are the same as Xingzhi's. Send a large number of outstanding students to Xingzhi Middle School and Hangzhong every year. Baoshan District has formed high-quality educational resources with Xingzhi Middle School as the core and the attached middle school and Xingzhi No.2 Middle School as the leader, which has standardized enrollment and funding issues. Another example is the integration of Yundong Middle School affiliated to Huairen No.1 Middle School and Yun Bei Zhu Xian No.2 Middle School. The principal of Huairen No.1 Middle School is also the chairman of two private middle schools, and each vice principal is also the principal of two private schools.
Another mode of education group is mostly private schools, which integrate kindergarten, primary school, junior high school and senior high school, and the group leader is also managed by different departments. For example, Wei Yong Education Group.
Second, the education alliance.
Education alliance is a service promotion model in which big schools take small schools and strong schools take weak schools. For example, the High School Attached to Shanghai Jiaotong University is one of the four famous schools (ordinary high schools) in Shanghai. It is a ten-track school with 65,438+0,200 students. Its school-running concept and benefit are in line with international standards, and it ranks in the forefront of ordinary high school education in China. In order to reflect its social benefits, some weak schools are driven by the high school attached to Jiaotong University and implement the strategy of education alliance. For example, more than 10 management team and backbone teachers were sent to Jiaxing Middle School, which changed the management mode and school-running concept, improved teachers' professional quality and teaching quality, and achieved remarkable results.
The core school management mode and teaching staff of the Education Alliance are very advanced, and the overseas teachers are not necessarily top-notch talents. The top management team is the middle-level cadres of the school, and the assignment of teachers will not affect the normal operation of the school. The education alliance is influenced by the government and is not an active action of the middle school attached to Jiaotong University. Jiaxing middle school has to pay 3 million trusteeship fees every year to become a local government. For example, the high school attached to Jiaotong University has to accept the leadership of Jiaotong University, and there is no particularly high-quality high school in the area where Jiaotong University is located (compare the Shanda High School attached to our city with the Shanda High School attached to Shanxi University). In the Party's mass line education practice, Jiaotong University proposed that the affiliated middle school of Jiaotong University should serve the students in the area of Jiaotong University and enjoy preferential educational resources. Therefore, the High School Attached to Jiaotong University will continue to serve and manage some weak high schools. One of the reasons why the affiliated middle school of Jiaotong University does not fully take the initiative to assume this social responsibility is that it is worried about being affected by "cutting peaks and filling valleys".
The educational alliance model between Lvliang Experimental Middle School and Fangshan Middle School has also been adopted and achieved remarkable results.
Third, the education sector.
Under the unified leadership of the local education administrative department, educational communities divide their primary and secondary schools into several educational communities according to the geographical relationship of administrative regions. Example: Guiyang No.2 Experimental Primary School, with this school as the core, and eight primary schools around it form an educational community. Nine schools are all public schools, and one of them was merged into a branch school by the Second Experimental Primary School. The general school serves the children of local residents, and the branch schools mainly receive the children of migrant workers. Schools in education mainly focus on business exchanges, and promote common improvement through collective guidance and teacher exchanges.
In 20 13, the city also divided the education cooperation group, which is the education community. Eight junior high schools in our district are divided into two cooperative groups. One is an educational community with Yaocun Middle School as its leader and Jinci No.1 Middle School, Jinci No.2 Middle School and Jinyuan No.1 Middle School as its members. The second is an educational society with experimental middle school as its leader and Jinyuan No.2 Middle School, Jinsheng Middle School and Power Plant Middle School as its members. This move only issued a notice, and there is no relevant system and supervision, so there is no substantive cooperation and improvement. In addition, the teacher exchange system has been implemented in our district this year. The whole district is divided into five exchange areas, which can also be considered as five educational communities. In recent years, the Education Bureau has paid special attention to the improvement of teaching quality, especially in senior high schools. Unconsciously, the vicious competition between junior high schools has been greatly reduced and the communication between junior high schools has been enhanced. I hope that the Education Bureau can create more opportunities for cooperation and exchange for junior high schools, and organize principals to go out for study and training when necessary.