Therefore, the whole world can talk about the market. Do I just need to be conscientious and dedicated? I only talk about my conscience, and the result is that I can't afford to eat, buy a house and live a good life. I really serve others wholeheartedly. We should not only talk about conscience, but also about interests, and pay attention to how to realize our own interests in the market economy. The first thing I have to do is to support myself and let myself live a decent life. If I relax a little, maybe my job will disappear.
The advantage of atomic individuals is that your upper limit may be very high, and you can obviously feel the improvement of your quality of life in the process of economic recovery; The disadvantage of atomic individuals is that the lower limit can be very low, and they can turn into a penny at any time without shopping. When we ask you to talk about giving, when you don't consider personal interests, when you are firmly opposed to egoists. It suits everyone. As a doctor, you strive to serve the public, regardless of personal gain or loss. But at the same time, your job is very stable, you don't have to worry about the contribution of unemployment, there are cheap houses and education, and you don't have to borrow a loan for 30 years to buy a school district.
As long as you don't make very serious mistakes, such as criminal offences, you will basically not lose your job. Many people have misunderstood this. You are a doctor, and you are lazy. It's not that you're sloppy in your position as a doctor. Being a doctor is not good. You can always see the door, right? It won't be closed for you like this. But what are the disadvantages? Even doctors can never become rich. Some doctors in atomic individuals are very rich. It is not that elite schools are full of exquisite egoism, but that our society requires all of us to become exquisite egoism. Otherwise, you are a special case. Famous schools just have too many auras, and China people have mysterious beliefs about them. Actually, most of them are ordinary people.
When I was an undergraduate, a teacher told us this in a big class. Your life is good, and neither are you. The advantage is that it is really comfortable and you don't need to do anything. They had to clean at that time, but now they are cleaning the house. The bad thing is that college is comfortable for four years, but I was dumbfounded as soon as I graduated. Although they have done everything in those years, they don't have to worry about their jobs after graduation or where to go. You are a lot of people who don't know where to go.
Young people nowadays are all atomic individuals. Don't put the problem on specific individuals. We are just doing what this society should do. I'm just pursuing my own interests, not committing crimes. Isn't this the values that we have admired for decades? When I succeed, I will repay the society.
Because they are so smart, they find that even though they have the aura of a prestigious school, there is still no system to protect them. Originally, it was a group of people who hoped to make a rapid leap through the incomplete solidification of social class. What about the squid game? There are many social loopholes, the law is not perfect enough to be completely restricted, and the welfare guarantee is not good enough. It can't protect honest people, but it can also let slick people take advantage of it. So what should we do? Either become dishonest or go to a place where honest people are protected.
Ordinary schools also have exquisite egoists, but famous schools are louder and easier for everyone to hear. Don't forget, when these people go to another country, most of them will start to be altruistic or less selfish. Because they also know that the self-interest cost of this society is too high, either legal punishment, or social isolation, or their conscience is really discovered.
Everyone tries to use his capital to maximize the value of his raw materials and products. Generally speaking, he doesn't try to improve public welfare, and he doesn't know how much public welfare has improved. What he pursues is only his personal happiness and personal interests, but when he does, there will be an invisible hand to guide him to achieve another goal, which is by no means what he pursues. Because he pursues personal interests, he often promotes social interests, which is more effective than what he really wants to promote.
This matter is not the pot of a famous school. Of course, prestigious schools have their own interests. Will a bad school join the society? It's just that people still have unrealistic expectations for famous schools, and think that people in famous schools should be idealists, not seeking fame and fortune, pursuing truth and serving the public. This is of course wrong. If you want everyone to contribute to the society, the distribution mechanism of your society must be "I am for everyone and everyone is for me". How can we start from public ownership and not distribute according to power?
If you can't do this, don't be selfish. For example, the market economy is based on the assumption of rational people and the maximization of personal interests. Of course, there must be a coordination mechanism between market players. Market economy is based on everyone's own interests. Since the market is the decisive factor in resource allocation, everyone should be self-interested. Therefore, at this time, it is not for self-interest to attack others, but for the deceived and the lame to understand quickly. If the allocation of resources depends on the market, and then some people are selfish and others are altruistic, then altruistic people will be eaten and squeezed out, unless a powerful third-party organization forcibly allocates resources to him in order to set a good example.
There is no need to be generous and obviously selfish. This is the law of the market. When you stand, you are ashamed to talk about profit and fool others into being selfish. This kind of person is actually the most chicken thief. Those who are fooled by them become dividends, which are shared by these chicken thieves who sing the public and do private things. Besides exquisiteness and self-interest. Students in prestigious schools may be smarter, more transparent and have higher EQ. When they are self-interested, they do things comprehensively, which is called exquisite self-interest. What about the coarse egoism of bad schools? If you take your things and don't say something nice to comfort you, it will obviously hurt your feelings. what do you think? At this time, someone came to take your things, but he spoke softly, making you feel like a spring breeze man. At least you were in a good mood, which is worse than taking yours.