The popularization of knowledge is equal for all. National policies are all in the direction of reading for all. University is originally a springboard for people to move from ivory tower to society, and also a cradle for cultivating talents. From the humanistic point of view, the popularization of university education can improve the cultural level of most people, and a large number of college students will certainly produce very useful talents under the competition. From the perspective of sociology, universal education in universities is a necessary condition to promote social development. The improvement of most people's cultural level and knowledge does not mean the improvement of the whole country and nation.
College students have elite education or general education. I think the elite education in university education emphasizes its own general education and the public.
First of all, when the individual has no need to enjoy, then the public has no starting point. Because there is no self, then the public is good to you, and this good word is not what you need, then the public is bad to you, then the public has no starting point. For example, for your own good, I will warm you up and buy you clothes, but if you say you don't need to be good, then you don't need to be warm and you don't need clothes, which is good for you and bad for you, so if you don't have yourself, it is also a slogan to be good for the public.
Secondly, if you simply care about yourself and ignore others, then if you hurt others, then others will not allow you to exist and will destroy you.
Thirdly, if you are good for the public, the public is too wide. For example, if you are an American now and you invest all your money in the American people, do you pay attention to the report, then your life will be very difficult. This is too broad for the public, so broad that your life will be poor, which does not conform to the first content.
You can ask if you don't understand.
O(∩_∩)O haha ~
Whether universities should carry out elite education or mass education should be evaluated according to the mentality of educators and educatees. For me, elite education should be done. Nowadays, the scale of college students is very large, and their scores are declining year by year. But now there are not so many jobs in society and elite education is needed.
Should university education be elite education or civilian education? Nine-year compulsory education is civilian education. Since high school, it has been diversified, and each student has his own strengths. He should develop in the direction that interests him most and suits him best, especially after college. On the one hand, he pays attention to specialization, on the other hand, he also takes into account the all-round development of all subjects;
After going to college, in addition to studying and striving for academic achievements, we must also hone and strive for Excellence in life, society and life, and strive to excel in life and be a strong person;
Is mass education better or elite education better? First of all, you should understand what is mass education and what is elite education.
At present, the basic universal education in China is very good, but it lacks elite education.
So I dare not tell you which is good.
According to the stages, the popular education of basic knowledge is enough, and the later education is best elite education.
When to popularize high school education? China still insists on nine-year compulsory education, but supports the practice of popularizing high school education in some places according to their own conditions. Sun Yunxiao, deputy director of China Youth Research Center, said on March 30th that the Outline of the National Medium-and Long-Term Education Reform and Development Plan will be published in August this year, but it is still unknown whether the nine-year compulsory education will be changed to 12. "Is it possible to change the nine-year compulsory education to 12? There is such an intention at present, but it is still inconclusive. " He pointed out that there are two directions in the proposal. One is to popularize high school education, and the other is to add one more year of preschool education. Sun Yunxiao also said that there are still 27 counties in China that have not completed the task of nine-year compulsory education, and the investment in education is still insufficient. On March 3 1 day, the Ministry of Education indicated that 12 compulsory education would not be implemented because it did not conform to China's current national conditions and national strength. At the same time, the Ministry of Education expressed support for some places to popularize high school education according to their own financial situation. However, popularizing high school education does not mean popularizing 12 compulsory education, because one of the characteristics of compulsory education is free education, and the state does not have financial resources at present. At present, the focus of compulsory education is to consolidate nine-year compulsory education. Zhuhai ranks first in China. People familiar with the matter said that even if 12 fails to include preschool education in the scope of free education, Jiangsu Province may regulate and rectify it through legislation. It is understood that Zhuhai * * * announced as early as August 1 2007 that starting from the autumn of 2007, Zhuhai will provide free education for primary and secondary school students registered in this city for 12 years, free of tuition fees and miscellaneous fees in the nine-year compulsory education stage, free of tuition fees in the high school education stage, and free of books and materials fees for students from "low-income" poor families. Should PK 12 compulsory education be carried out? What should I do? Those who agree with the "obligation" of preschool education say that * * * has the responsibility to strengthen preschool education. Some experts pointed out that there are few public kindergartens and too little investment, which leads to chaos in preschool education, especially the problem of high fees. The contrast between kindergarten education and primary school free education is too great: parents have to pay nearly 5,000 yuan for dolls to attend provincial model kindergartens. Early childhood education is very important, but at present, early childhood education is the weak link in the whole education system, and it is also the least valued. * * * It is the responsibility to strengthen early childhood education. Only by bringing early childhood education into compulsory education can we have stronger capital. Some experts suggest that the practice of "running schools with social forces as the main body" should be revised as soon as possible, and the Law on Early Childhood Education should be promulgated as soon as possible to rationalize the kindergarten system and make public parks the main body. Those who agree with the "obligation" of high school education say that free high school is fairer. Some experts point out that the implementation of compulsory education in senior high schools can alleviate the pressure of employment in the future, increase the knowledge assets of the next generation, improve their future employability, and help solve the problems of agriculture, countryside and farmers. Some experts said that if 12 year compulsory education includes high school, it can better reflect the purpose of educational equity.
Is elite education better or mass education better? Only elite education can't do it, and neither can mass education. A country should have both elite education and mass education. Elite education cultivates senior talents, while mass education improves the quality of the whole people.
Both are indispensable. However, different countries and different periods have their own emphases.
Whether a university is an elite education or a money education can be decided by the person in charge. Too much spending, too little teaching, poor classroom quality, no responsibility to learn too much. There is no elite education at all, and most of them are unemployed after graduation.
But now colleges and universities are profit-making units, and they are equally anxious to recruit students. When they simply choose back-to-back bidirectional, no one knows who it is. When introducing the school, they never clearly mark the price and charge. Once you are admitted, once your file is grabbed, once you are eager for the admission notice to the extreme, and you are excited to get the paper, then the sky-high cost will suddenly appear. At this time, if you don't go, you have to go. If the economy is better, the East and the West will borrow that huge sum of money, then happily entertain their teachers and relatives, and then embark on the road to university. If the economic situation is poor, you will have to stare blankly. Sometimes, I think this is a kind of deception, sometimes I think this is a kind of fraud, and sometimes I think this is a kind of robbery.
The retired minister of education once said that education reform has been going on for many years, and many schools have not moved at all. I don't know what the specific content of educational reform is, but I always feel that the more I change, the more I need money. I remember a photo of an old professor holding a sign saying that no one should ask students for money in the name of education. Now I feel how pathetic he is. This is his own battle, and he is so faced with it.