I worked in Spark for a while and talked about Spark in my mind. One: Disadvantages: 1. The staff turnover rate is extremely high, basically changing once every three months. First-line clubs recruit employees with low wages, great pressure and heavy tasks, and teachers have more than 30 hours of voluntary class hours. Many people leave because of low wages, more than two thousand a month. . . 2. The leadership has changed a lot, and HR recruits all kinds of flicker. Basically, you have been handing it in for the first half of the year. 3. The turnover rate of employees is extremely high, whether it is a teacher post or an administrative post of consulting learning management. Basically, copy it if you want. If you really can't find a job, you can consider entering this enterprise. Moreover, the internal personnel department has changed a lot, and the batch I know has basically disappeared within half a year. . . Starting from the brand Spark English, it is not a company at all. In the interview, it was said to be a cooperative enterprise, but it was not a company at all. Spark English also tells Spark Education. . . Two: advantages: the range between colleagues is ok, and the environment is good. These are the only two advantages. . . .