Education determines the future rise and fall of a nation. Four Books and Five Classics will bring up moral integrity, stereotyped writing will bring up dogmatic people, and exam-oriented education will bring up high scores and low abilities. Therefore, what kind of education will produce what kind of talents. However, the motherland is currently facing a bigger education problem, the education of children of floating population.

The high educational threshold of floating population is actually a helpless move of the school. The capacity of a school is limited, coupled with a large number of floating children, the combination of the two conditions, then it is necessary and helpless for students to have a high threshold. Otherwise, let the children of floating population enter school, what about local children? Is it necessary for local children to study abroad? This is obviously wrong and irrational.

Some people say that local schools should be expanded. This requires accommodation, teachers, classrooms, and disproportionate educational effects of students at school. This is a kind of high investment and high risk, which will bring more problems. The first is that the floating population is not fixed. It's here this year and will go somewhere else next year. What about the expanded school? What about the recruited teachers? Wait a minute. On the other hand, how to solve the problem of student loss in schools where floating population comes from? These schools are going to merge? Want to close the door? The consequences will be more serious than the expansion of local schools.

Therefore, to solve the education problem of the children of floating population, all of the above are temporary solutions, not permanent solutions. And the effect is extremely poor. The current form has proved this. There are also places that do better, such as Shaoxing, Zhejiang. Look at the rumors on the internet. Sounds good. However, when the economy changes and the mobility of the floating population further increases, I think the consequences are as mentioned above. Moreover, it does not clarify the quality of education. It should be said that it is only a form to let the children of floating population go to school.

So how to solve the education problem of children of floating population? This is to be fundamentally solved. We know that the most basic structure of society is economic structure. At present, China's basic national conditions are that the economic development between the north and the south, the east and the west is unbalanced, and the gap between the rich and the poor is large. There is a surplus of manpower in the north and west, but the economy is seriously backward, while the economy in the south and east is developed and manpower is scarce. These two points are enough to produce so many floating population. Then their children's education problems also appeared one after another (including Spring Festival travel rush robbing people, the contradiction between locals and foreigners, and so on). This has also caused problems in social harmony and social security. Of course, this is only what I can understand. There are more problems that I can't foresee and express. From this, it can be understood that to fundamentally solve the education problem of children of floating population, we must solve it from the perspective of economic development. It solves the problems of unbalanced regional economic development and the gap between the rich and the poor. In this way, the economic development of the southeast region will not be too concentrated, and the economic development of the northwest region will not be too backward. It solves the problems of high load in the southeast and vast northwest. Everyone can earn money at home. I'm afraid only a few people like tourists and businessmen want to move. Then there wouldn't be such a huge floating population. Children's education problems are self-defeating.

With such a huge floating population and a heavy employment load, it will definitely not be sustainable development. It leads to brain drain, human extinction and backward development. This is not sustainable development. This is also a waste of resources. So this is a great loss for the Chinese nation.

It is gratifying that in 2000, former Prime Minister Zhu served as the team leader, set up a leading group for the development of the western region, and launched the policy of the development of the western region. Its significance and achievements can be seen everywhere on the Internet. Therefore, our government is not free, but far-sighted. However, the urgency of the current problem is really worrying. I hope that governments at all levels and leading bodies can be "pragmatic" and so on. This is a policy that fundamentally solves many major problems. Better hurry.

In addition, my humble opinion is that it is best to keep a certain number of floating population, which can promote regional cultural exchanges and the promotion of advanced technology.