1, mastering answering skills is more useful than looking at those common questions. \x0d\ 2。 To provide the following skills for answering the second analysis question of middle school teachers' qualification certificate: \x0d\ Analysis question is also called judgment explanation question, which is a question type that judges right and wrong first, and then judges and explains. The analysis questions are composed of two parts: analysis and analysis x0d, which is characterized by the combination of analysis and analysis. Discrimination is discrimination and judgment, and analysis is interpretation and judgment. This type of question appears in the national unified examination of the second subject of middle school for teacher qualification certificate, in order to examine the examinee's mastery and application of basic knowledge related to educational theory, and also to examine the examinee's dialectical thinking ability. \x0d\ In previous years, there were four analysis questions in the second subject of middle school, with 8 points for each question and a total score of 32 points. This kind of question seems simple, but according to the survey, most candidates have the highest failure rate in this part. The reasons are as follows: First, the concept is distorted. Most students simply regard this kind of question as a judgment question in the process of preparing for the exam, and do not pay enough attention to it. They think they can score if they follow their inclinations. Low learning motivation leads to simple judgment in the process of doing problems. Judging from the analysis questions of teacher qualification papers over the years, the standard answers given in the end often focus on the analysis of the following questions, rather than judgment. Therefore, when we do analysis, if we only judge the right or wrong views, we can only get 2 points. I suggest you pay attention and practice more in the review process. \x0d\\x0d\ Secondly, another reason for losing points is that the answer format was ignored in the exam. Generally speaking, when encountering an analysis problem, we must first distinguish our own views. Generally speaking, there are three possibilities in the process of answering questions: right, wrong and one-sided. However, the probability of being one-sided in the teacher qualification examination is very small, and most of the questions only let us judge right or wrong, which is relatively simple. The second is to explain the reasons. Many students lose the most points at this point. Explain the reasons in an orderly way and strive to be comprehensive and specific. If the viewpoints in the question are correct, then we should use what we have learned to analyze why they are correct. If the point of view in the question is wrong, first show the correct point of view, then analyze why your point of view is correct, and explain the reasons for the wrong point of view and its related knowledge. The next step is to sum up, many students often ignore it, resulting in unnecessary points deduction. \x0d\ can be summarized as "one debate, two analyses and three summaries". \x0d\\x0d\ Finally, integrate the answers. In order to cope with the exam, we should make the answer logical, seamless, concise and clear, which requires us to finally integrate the key points of the answer with our heart: adjust the position of the key points before and after, and integrate closely related points; Merge shared views; Summarize the trunk of the question with some concluding sentences, so that the answer is put away. It is worth noting that in the process of integrating the answers, we should pay attention to the details of \x0d\ and delete the contents appropriately.