At the beginning of the year, in the hit costume drama "Do you know, lush years, fat and thin time", Zhao played Sheng talking with his grandmother. In my opinion, it is deceptive to say that reading is useless. If it's really useless, how can all men in the world go to the examination room? Are you free? I think this sentence is just that men want women to be muddled, obedient and funny all their lives. ? I can't help wondering why Ming Lan, as an ancient man, has such advanced modern ideas. Didn't she have to accept it since she was a child? A woman without talent is a virtue? Education?

0 1 since ancient times, a woman without talent is virtue? ?

In A Dream of Red Mansions, Xue Baochai said when discussing with Lin Daiyu five beautiful songs written by Lin Daiyu on a fan. Since ancient times, women's lack of talent is virtue, chastity is always the main thing, and female workers are secondary. The rest of the poems are just boudoir games, with or without them. Girls like us don't want the reputation of these talents. ?

What did Xue Baochai say? A woman without talent is a virtue? Really? Since ancient times? Really? ? Since ancient times? what's up Ancient times? how much is it? Ancient times? ?

Some people think it came from Ban Zhao in the Han Dynasty? A woman without talent is a virtue? The idea has sprouted.

Ban Zhao's Women's Commandments once said,? Female virtue doesn't have to be brilliant, but it's different, right? What does this sentence mean? A woman without talent is a virtue? More similar. But if you think about it carefully, Ban Zhao herself is a famous female historian in ancient China, and Ban Zhao's daughters are all literate, so what she said is just out of date? You don't have to be brilliant, do you? , not? No talent? . And he also argues in the book that women in the family should? Sun Wen? , so it won't work? Humiliate others, humiliate the clan? .

Others believe that since the Song Dynasty, with the prosperity of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties, the imprisonment of female talents has been gradually strengthened. This statement is even more nonsense, not to mention the acceptance of Neo-Confucianism in the Song Dynasty. Just the famous poets in Song Dynasty, represented by Li Qingzhao, Zhu Xi, Zhang and Tang Wan, is enough to prove that the family did not imprison women's talents and thoughts in society at that time.

In the Northern Song Dynasty, Wei Tai also praised the women at that time in Hanshu Hermit Poetry. There are many modern women's poems, and there are often people who become ancients. ? Some people even take Xie Daowen, a famous ancient woman writer, as their daughter's role model. For example, Wang, a petty officer studying in Longtuge, once wrote in a birthday poem for his daughter:? May you live a long and healthy life. ?

02 as？ Zheng de? Appeared? No talent?

At present, the earliest description of this sentence comes from Chen Jiru (1558? 1639) See Speech by the Elder, in which he quoted? Elder? Say, and comment, say? Women are literate, but those who can understand the righteousness are virtuous, but they are rare; Others like to read songbooks and novels, fan the flames, and even dance with words and make ugly deeds. Instead, it is better to be illiterate and keep silent. ?

As can be seen from its explanation, isn't the purpose of Chen Jiru's quoting this sentence in his book to oppose women? Literacy? , but against its cause? Literacy? And then what? I like reading Quben novels, fanning the flames, and even playing tricks and doing ugly things? . So, what is Chen Jiru's real purpose? Zheng de? , not? No talent? .

This understanding is not accidental. For example, similar views are expressed in women's studies. A virtuous woman in ancient and modern times is also expensive. There used to be clouds? A woman without talent is a virtue? Those who are not evil talents just say that they are young and talented but don't know how to learn. Just to decorate their names for pity is not as good as the village and the field. ?

Of course, some people object to this method of overestimating food because of choking on food. For example, the preface to the history of ancient and modern women says: husband? No talent is virtue? It seems a little overkill. Why not be virtuous? The theory of true equality. ? "Female Fan Jielu? The article "Cai De" says:? Talented men are virtuous, and their words are acceptable. A woman without talent is virtuous, and this language is sincere; Cover the classic distinction between ignorance and virtue and evil and right. ?

Is this reasonable?

Some people oppose this view from the perspective of combining ability with political integrity, while others criticize it from the perspective of reasonable talent and desire. For example, Feng Menglong said in The Complete Works of Think Tank:? There is a saying:? A man with virtue is a talent, and a woman without talent is a virtue. ? Sure, why not? Without talent, you can be virtuous, so all stupid women in the world are not virtuous. ? The tone is full of irony. Yuan Mei also boldly said:? The so-called woman is not suitable for poetry, which is really embarrassing! Sages, Guan Ju, Ge Mo and Juan Er are three hundred poems, all of which are women's poems? ,? Women have articles, which are determined by heaven. ?

In addition to verbal objections, some people also use practical actions to prove that women should also learn poetry. For example, Yuan Mei once took a female disciple to teach poetry. Under his influence, during the Qianlong period? South to Fujian and Guangdong, north to roadshows? ,? At that time, all the red powder worshipped the door wall? ,? Great river north and south, the famous boudoir bookstore, is also proud of its words. In the past 200 years, poets have enjoyed a higher reputation than those who accompanied the garden. Therefore, when the female literary world is clean, it has a direct or indirect relationship with the garden. .

It must be noted that? A woman without talent is a virtue? This proposition has always been controversial in ancient China, and the ancients never reached a unified understanding on how to deal with the relationship between virtue and talent. If someone takes an ancient controversial one today? Debate? As the golden rule, is it self-righteous to ask women to give up the pursuit of knowledge? De? It will slip into this world.