The first attack on Shu, Jingzhou can only leave one general, who will not leave Guan Yu? Zhang Fei? Sun Tzu's art of war has a bad temper and won't bring a water army. Zhao Yun? Too strong, afraid of his self-respect. Ma Chao? Thank you. I haven't surrendered yet Huang Yan? Just surrendered.
Secondly, I basically agree with you, but I also speak for Liu Bei. In the first half of his life, he was fled by the big princes. It was not until he was 46 years old that Zhuge went uphill. Then it took about 20 years to seize Jingzhou and occupy Shu, and he was geographically the first vassal in the world, right? Think about a person who has nothing in the first half of his life for 46 years, and Zhuge has been in the world for about 20 years. Is it not normal to relax in this life?
Third, I didn't understand the art of war and launched the Yiling War just to avenge Guan Yu. Honestly, it's all wet. Losing Jingzhou is fatal to Shu Han. Jingzhou, the center of the world at that time, was a vast plain extending in all directions and a battleground for military strategists. Shu can use it to directly attack Cao Wei and Wu Dong. This is why he launched the Yiling War. With tens of thousands of Shu soldiers, he can only do it quickly. Think about how bad the art of war can be for a man who has been fighting for more than 40 years. In the battle of Yiling, Lu Xun must have won more with less. So a fire, a battalion, a raid can kill all the Shu army? No, we can only burn morale and disperse the Shu army. So in midsummer, when the Shu army stayed in the sun every day, Wu Jun attacked the Shu army. Even if everyone's morale is high and they are thirsty for a long time, I don't believe those deserters can still run. You'd better take a risk and camp in the Woods. Even if they attack Liu Bei with fire, those Yizhou soldiers will definitely go home, so it is very possible to recall a Shu soldier.
Fourth, it is impossible for Liu Bei not to understand talent mining. Otherwise, why did Prime Minister Zhuge "spend all his money"? The only explanation is that there is really no way to find out what Cao Cao, Liu Bei and Zhuge Liang have in common, that is, they don't want the cremation to control the world. Anyone who knows the Three Kingdoms knows that the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties were the times of gentry. They are substitutes for * * * officials. You recommended my family to be an official. I recommend your family to be an official. You are an ordinary person. It is no problem to want to be an official. I will recommend your family to be an official after I get up. As a result, there are more and more gentry. All three of them knew that the country would not last long, but they couldn't figure out a way. In addition, Liu Bei must bring a group of gentry into Shu. Can the local gentry in Yizhou agree? By the way, I don't know if Liu Bei will teach his son, but I know his son is disappointed in him. See Baidu Encyclopedia Liu Chan for details.
Question 2: Why did Liu Bei fail? Remember Yi Zhongtian said that Zhuge Liang was an outstanding politician, not a strategist! Some classic examples, such as burning Bowangpo, were commanded by Liu Bei, not Zhuge Liang. Zhuge Liang is an out-and-out "minister who can rule the world"
It is said in the novel that "Feng Chu can live in peace", which is Luo Guanzhong's view. The most important factors in a novel are people and events. Luo Guanzhong wrote this to highlight Zhuge, not historical facts.
Most of the novels and TV plays are battles for the Shu army to seize power, but they are just battles. In fact, the direction of the whole war has always been in the hands of the Cao Wei regime.
People say that there are Zhuge+Five Tiger Generals in Shu, but in fact, Wei and Wu also have them, and Wei's Xiahou, Cao Hong, Zhang Liao, Chu Xu and Huang Xu; Han Dang and Zhou Tai of Soochow were not under Zhao Mahuang, Guo Jia died young, and wise men such as Xun, Cheng Yu and Jia Xu were not under Zhuge. Again, the God of Zhuge and the fierceness of the Five Tigers are all endowed by Luo Guanzhong, and history is different from novels.
Question 3: Why did Liu Bei fail? Success is wise, failure is wise. Zhuge Liang's "Longzhong Dui" seriously misjudged himself. The most important thing is the first one: connect Sun Wu in the east. This strategy was right at first, but it changed even if it didn't happen later. Sun Quan is ambitious. How can he be a foil? How can Sun Quan let Jingzhou Guan Yu go and try his best to jointly attack Cao Wei with Liu Bei? The strategic mistake can't be made up for in any case, because the direction is wrong. Zhuge Liang also had many bad performances in Shu Han, such as borrowing Jingzhou and not returning it, harming Guan Yu and so on. Zhuge Liang's longzhong right is far less than Guo Jia's theory of ten wins.
Question 4: Tell me the reason for Liu Bei's failure 1: Cao Cao is proud and underestimates his enemy.
2. There are Marten and Han Sui in the north to contain Cao Cao's energy.
3. Cao Jun is not good at water warfare.
4. Half of Cao Jun are newly fallen people, and their fighting capacity is very poor.
5. Soochow is a common enemy and has high morale.
Zhou Yu is good at detecting weather factors.
7: Huang Gai's fire attack fake surrender plan is excellent.
8. Liu Bei and Kong Ming actively cooperated.
Battle of red cliff
Date of war: July 2008 ~ 2008 1 1 month.
Venue: Wulin (now northwest of Puyin, Hubei) ... >>
Question 5: In the battle of Yiling, Liu Bei had 750,000 troops. Why did he fail? Romantic stories are not credible. In the battle of Yiling in history, Liu Bei's troops will not exceed 65,438+10,000, but only 70,000, and the total troops used by Soochow will be about 70,000 to 80,000.
If we say war, we must first say peace. The war launched by Liu Bei was wrong from the beginning. It was Cao Pi, not Sun Quan, who usurped the Han Dynasty. Liu Bei succeeded to the Han Dynasty and should cut Cao Pi. Morally lost the opportunity.
Zhuge Liang, Zhao Yun and other important generals dissuaded Liu Bei, who went his own way and split internally. Most of Liu Bei's troops came from Shu, neither of them was familiar with them, and they were reluctant to leave Shu to fight. There were only a few former Jingzhou soldiers. Before going to war, I broke the official orders of Fazheng and General Zhang Fei, and my morale was frustrated. Sun Quan's men United to defend the country, and approached Jingzhou, breaking Guan Yu, and their morale was high. On the whole, they lost the second move.
Third, Liu Bei's eastward expedition must have enough troops to stay in Shu, and Sun Quan can resist the whole division. Lost the third move in strength.
Fourth, in the last world war-the battle of Hanzhong, Liu Bei's important advisers and generals Fa Zheng, Wei Yan, Zhang Fei and Ma Chao were unable to participate in the war. Most of the people brought out this time are new recruits. Sun Quan's men are all veteran ministers who are used to fighting, and they lost the fourth move in personnel.
Fifth, Liu Bei doesn't know the art of war, Wu people fight at home, and geography loses the fifth move.
Sixth, Liu Bei has ulterior motives. I don't know the art of war. Sun Quan's talented people had a far-reaching influence and strategically lost the sixth move.
To sum up, what did Liu Bei lose?
Question 6: Why did Liu Bei's management problem fail in The Romance of the Three Kingdoms? It has a strong color of China traditional culture. From the perspective of modern management, we can only critically inherit and learn from it, and we must use scientific management methods to improve today's management level. However, China people are from China after all, and we must have a correct understanding of China people in many aspects. In the past, we said that commercial enterprises could read The Romance of the Three Kingdoms as a book, but Professor Zhang told us that it was basically useless and could only refer to, analyze and draw lessons from it. You make a mistake by playing those tricks hard. You don't have to build weapons, just wait for the "grass boat to borrow arrows." You can borrow it today! These are all lies. What happened to Zhuge Liang is basically a lie. Therefore, the management problems involved in classic works need us to think independently and analyze and learn from today's management concepts.
(Reporter Ying Jie)
Draw a circle with people-the biggest obstacle to career success
Many people appreciate Liu, Guan and Zhang after reading The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, but among the three political groups in The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Liu, Guan and Zhang are the least successful, with the smallest territory and the shortest existence time. But people often use the theory of destiny to explain that bad luck led to the failure of their careers, but this is not the case. Liu Bei's success lies in his personal charm, while his failure lies in "drawing circles" with others.
Taoyuan loyalty gave Liu, Guan and Zhang a program of action and lofty goals. Through loyalty, the three of them almost became one person, forming a very strong core cohesion. This is Liu Bei's greatest success. The second way to success is to treat others sincerely and attach importance to friendship, that is, to stress honesty and sincerity, which is a magic weapon to enhance internal cohesion, strengthen internal unity and attract talents. For example, Zhang Fei once let the other enemy take Liu Bei's two wives away because of drunkenness, but Liu Bei didn't blame Zhang Fei at all. Instead, he used "Brothers are like brothers, wives are like clothes, and clothes can be mended, but brothers can't be broken" (Editor's Note: The History of the Three Kingdoms has its dross). Liu Bei's success is also reflected in the courtesy to corporal, such as inviting Zhuge Liang from Xinye to Wollongong. It is also Liu Bei's strength to be honest with subordinates, to use people without doubt and to form a good team spirit. For example, at that time in Changbanpo, Liu Bei was told that Zhao Yun must have run away this time. Liu Bei said no, I believe Zhao Yun is not such a person. Later, Zhao Yun was a savior alone in Changbanpo. When Liu Bei's children came back covered in blood, Liu Bei comforted Zhao Yun by throwing children. This is an act of buying people's hearts, but it also shows the honesty and trust of a senior manager.
The main reason for Liu Bei's failure is to draw circles with others. Taoyuan Jieyi is a double-edged sword, which not only forms the core cohesion, but also produces negative effects. After Liu Bei and Zhuge Liang teamed up with Dongwu to defeat Cao Cao, Cao Cao fled to Huarong Road, and Guan Yu spared this biggest enemy. Guan Yu let Cao Cao go by military means, of course, but because of his deep brotherhood, Liu Bei finally did not deal with Guan Yu, which was a very serious mistake. The inefficiency of management later led to many problems, which our managers know today. Liu Bei is a political group with Liu, Guan and Zhang as its core. At the critical moment, both Zhao Yun and Zhuge Liang are useless. The implication is that Zhuge Liang and Zhao Yun both work for Liu Bei. Therefore, in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, we see that Zhao Yun was also named as a general of the five tigers, and Guan Yu often said to him that "although he is not sworn, he is a brother", so he must bring the word "Ye". These people are actually loyal to Liu Bei, but when the interests of the three brothers are affected, others have to stand aside. Zhuge Liang and Zhao Yun are the second circle figures of Shuhan Group, Huang Zhong and Ma Chao are the third circle figures, and then there is the fourth circle. Liu Zhang's subordinates are outsiders. After all, people like Wei Yan can be killed at any time. This kind of management will inevitably lead to problems, and it will not be a big cause.
Machiavelli-style separation of power ―― First, learn to be a man.
Cao Cao is "a minister capable of managing the world and a traitor in troubled times". Cao Cao said, "I'd rather lose the whole world than let the whole world lose me." This is management. Actually, these words are too dangerous. They were not sent by Cao Cao. It's all interpreted by novelists. Cao Cao's success lies in adopting the method of "tactical separation" to control people who are "talented without virtue" or "talented with virtue".
Cao Cao's fierce generals are like clouds, and his advisers are like rain. Nowadays, people pay attention to both ability and political integrity. People with talent and no virtue can't be used, but Cao Cao has this ability. Whether you have moral character or not, as long as you have the ability, I will use it.
The greatness of Cao Cao lies in ... >>
Question 7: Reasons for Liu Bei's failure to attack Wu In the autumn and July of the first year of Zhangwu, Liu Bei began the most brilliant performance in his military career-exaggeratedly speaking, Liu Bei completed his life on horseback, and it seems that his eight characters were not good, from Youzhou to Xuzhou, from Jizhou to Jingzhou, and finally to Yizhou, and found a foothold in the southwest corner. He seems unfortunate, but on the other hand, he is so lucky that he often misses a beat. From Gongsun Zan, Tao Qian, Lyu3 bu4, Cao Cao, Yuan Shao, Liu Biao to Sun Quan, he changed his master several times, but he always managed to change his master at the right time. This is a great miracle. On the whole, like all comets in the world, he is a tumbler himself.
But one can't be lucky all one's life, and everyone will have their own Waterloo. Just like everyone will have their own silent hill, although Liu Bei has long been accustomed to failure, the biggest failure in his life is the curtain call performance, which can be described as "the late festival is not guaranteed." Not long ago, Liu Bei, who was still immersed in the great victory in Hanzhong, immediately fell into the pain of Jingzhou being taken and the defeat of the Eastern Expedition. The pain at this time is no longer as simple as the frustration in the past, and the contrast between before and after is so great. For a politician, this must be the greatest pain in the world, but can crusade really be avoided?
Everyone in the three countries wrote many articles on the crusade. Is the failure due to the water army? Economy? Lu Xun? Or just in Liu Bei himself? Since ancient times, the winner is king, and the loser is kou. In history, Liu Bei's crusade ended in fiasco. Is it really a mistake? In Liu Bei's view, he had to crusade because he had no choice at all. Even if he knew in advance that the battle would be defeated, he couldn't cancel the crusade. He had to go in person.
After moving to Yizhou, Han Shu Group can be divided into three groups-Yuancong Group, Jingzhou Group and Yizhou Group.
During the Xu You period, Yuan Cong Group joined Liu Bei's camp. Representative figures are Zhang, Zhao, Mi, Sun and Jane. They have followed Liu Bei from place to place for many years and have long been used to moving, so losing Jingzhou is tantamount to losing Xuzhou and other places for them. If you lose it, you lose it. It's not worth gambling. In this sense, Zhao Yun can of course protest from a rational point of view, and it is completely reasonable to analyze from his point of view. And Zhao's opinion can roughly represent the idea of the original group.
Judging from Jingzhou Group, it is very unwilling that their hometown was taken away. They are not as painful as the original group, nor do they have their psychological endurance. Moreover, the loss of Jingzhou made them lose the capital to compete with Yizhou Group. Naturally, they will not stand idly by. This may be the most important reason why Zhuge Liang acquiesced in Liu Bei's expedition.
For Yizhou Group, these indigenous landlords have been very dissatisfied with a group of people brought by Ada, and they are competing with them for food. How can they tolerate those Jingzhou gentlemen squeezing into the ruined temple that is not enough? They can't wait for these Jingzhou gentlemen to go back to self-reliance, otherwise it's really three monks who have no water to drink.
Combining the calculations of the three groups, it is not difficult for us to understand the inevitability of Liu Bei's crusade. In fact, he really had no choice. Even though he knew that he would lose, he would benefit Cao Wei. But after weighing the pros and cons, Liu Bei clearly realized that the crusade was necessary, even if it was only symbolic. What's more, the Crusaders may not be defeated. Although the economy is not as good as the other side, although the strength is endless, they have one thing that is far behind the other side, and that is morale.
Let's talk about the personnel deployment of the Eastern Expedition. If we compare the personnel deployment of Liu Bei's crusade with the ideas of the three major groups, we can find that Liu Bei really took great pains: General Feng, Wu Ban and others acted as pioneers, among whom Jingzhou people did a good job when Liu Bei entered Shu, otherwise he would not be a general. It is only because of the unwritten custom of Shu that these heroes are forgotten.
Only Chu Youcai is right, but most of these people are literati. As the saying goes, there are many famous people in Jingchu, but few famous people. Perhaps this is related to Liu Biao's previous ruling policy. Jingzhou fell, and a group of celebrities were dropped or hanged. There used to be a very famous man in Jingzhou, namely Huang Zhong, who cut Xiahou Miaocai in Dingjun Mountain. Unfortunately, a few years ago ... >>
Question 8: How did Liu Bei fail? So now go to Jingzhou? On the whole? Liu Bei succeeded? After Guan Yu lost Jingzhou? And then he was killed? Zhang Fei was also killed by his men? Liu Bei attacked Wu in a rage? This is a strategic mistake? Both sides? Fight? There is always a loss? It has led to a significant weakening of national strength. Then Zhuge Liang went out to Qishan five times to suppress bandits? No? Is it to destroy Cao or consume a lot of manpower and material resources? Because Zhuge Liang is cautious? Take the army and fight slowly? Dare not fight quickly? So what? Consume a lot? Besides? When the country is weakest. Wei attacked on a large scale? Isn't this a waste?
Tell me more about Liu Bei's son? Look at Cao Cao's son? Get a good education from an early age? What about sinus? Zhao Yun was saved and thrown to the ground? Did you break it? (of course? Has the truth really fallen? I don't know. Let's talk about this man. Not good for my son. Thinking about talent? Liu Bei also wants Zhuge Liang to be emperor? Inherit? But what about people of that era? Believe in orthodoxy? So Zhuge Liang has no chance? That is to say? This is fate? Even if the son of heaven is incompetent, he will stand up. The rest, that's nothing. Huh? Superstition in those days? (Otherwise the Yellow Scarf Uprising wouldn't have started) So? Was Liu Bei ever strong? But in the end, I made some minor mistakes!
Hope to adopt?
Question 9: What is the reason for Liu Bei's failure in the Three Kingdoms? Liu Bei is too kind and has no ambition. Secondly, Liu Bei has no strategy, which can be seen by burning the camp. It can be seen that without Zhuge Liang around, Liu Bei can only lose the battle. I think it was a big turning point. Lu Xun burned the camp and 700,000 soldiers and horses were destroyed. Then Liu Bei died and Liu Chan succeeded to the throne. Liu Chan is really useless, except Zhuge Liang, there are almost no talents in Shu. Although I left Qishan six times, I met Sima Yi again. The strength of the two is equal, and tossing is not a result. When Zhuge Liang died, Sima Yi had a chance. Jiang Wei is no match for Sima Yi at all, and Sima Yi's destruction of Shu is inevitable.
Question 10: What is the reason for Liu Bei's failure? No, Liu Bei didn't fail, because Liu Bei's son, Liu Chan, did nothing, loved fighting cocks, and didn't stop Zhuge Liang's words, which led to the worship of soldiers. Some figureheads told him to work hard to restore the country, but he still didn't go back, because the idiom "happy because of Liu Chan" didn't appear.