Basically, the point of view is that the children from poor families have a chance to turn over, and everyone is equal before the score. Disadvantages: how to educate children well by turning them into people with high scores and low abilities and cramming education?

I won't dwell on the idea of rotten streets. I have no new ideas, so I can't be ashamed to share them with you.

In fact, everyone misunderstood the advantages and disadvantages of exam-oriented education.

0 1 First of all, I'd like to introduce the next Danish documentary, Class Z in 9 Years in Denmark VS Class 3 in China 13.

The film explores the advantages and disadvantages of education in China and Denmark through documentary.

The film is about a Danish normal middle school, which organized a competition with the children of a normal middle school with the same level in Heilongjiang Province, China, to measure the students' level from five aspects: reading, mathematics, English, teamwork and innovation.

The competition process was designed by Danish education experts and graded by teachers from Denmark and China.

This is really the first confrontation between quality education and exam-oriented education.

What was the result?

Apart from English, China children beat Danish children in reading, mathematics, teamwork and innovation.

This result is so unexpected that even Danish producers can't think of it.

Because many Danes have the same idea as us, that is, exam-oriented education is very efficient in instilling knowledge, but it stifles creativity and team ability.

On the contrary, quality education is better than exam-oriented education in this respect, which is the direction of our reform.

Danish children who carry out quality education have lost to China children who carry out exam-oriented education in these two aspects.

China students beat Danish students many times in the project. Before the team project, the Danish teacher decided that China cramming education couldn't win, but the result was embarrassing.

In fact, the name exam-oriented education is wrong. According to the typical characteristics of education in China, we should call it "industrialized education".

Why?

First, China education has a clear and complete syllabus and standard answers. The most important task of teachers is to ensure that students master the contents required by the syllabus.

Secondly, in order to test the quality of teachers' work and students' academic achievements, there is a strict and time-divided daily assessment system, such as monthly examination, mid-term examination and final examination, and there is also a final assessment system, namely the college entrance examination.

Third, in order to cooperate with the teaching task, the school carries out paramilitary management of students, that is, to control students' private time schedule as much as possible.

Fourth, in this education system, the most important quality that students learn is not to make mistakes.

After these four items are listed, what kind of talents will you find most suitable for this kind of education?

The answer is: industrial workers on the assembly line.

Workers' work tasks are clear and no mistakes are allowed;

Workers' performance is judged by a strict time-sharing assessment system;

In order to ensure that workers can work most efficiently, factories like Foxconn manage workers by paramilitary means;

Finally, the most important quality that assembly line workers learn is not to make mistakes.

Therefore, the more accurate name of this kind of education should be "industrialized education".

In the history of mankind, apart from "industrialized education", there are two forms of education, namely "oral education" and "liberal arts education".

"Oral instruction" is easy to understand. At the earliest, parents at home educated their children, and then apprentices were educated by apprentices. This is a relatively primitive education, and the information transmission efficiency is very low.

"Boya Boya Education" is a form of education advocated by ancient philosophers and nobles.

What are its characteristics? Even if I don't impose any tasks on you, you will read classics and think about important issues out of pure desire for wisdom, and then one day you will be enlightened and become a great philosopher.

The "quality education" that many people admire actually comes from this ideal of "liberal education" in the final analysis.

There are thousands of Confucius students, and only seventy-two sages can be enlightened.

Among these three forms of education, which one is better and has the highest innovation efficiency?

Judging from those lofty words, many people like "liberal arts education", so they think it is better, but from the actual effect, the answer is actually "industrial education".

Why do you say that?

Let's think about it. What does the innovation of liberal arts education depend on? A philosopher's brilliant idea. When there will be a breakthrough and to what extent, it is random.

But the innovation of modern society is not realized by the idea of genius, but by disassembling knowledge into basic principles and then rearranging and combining these basic principles by yourself.

Do you think Newton really discovered gravity when he was hit by an apple?

Gravity has always appeared in our lives. Why didn't others, including Newton, discover gravity before, until later?

That's because human knowledge and Newton's knowledge have accumulated to a certain extent. Without that apple, something else would have inspired Newton to discover gravity. Even without Newton, others would have found it.

If Newton doesn't have much knowledge, it's no use being killed by an apple.

So what is the most needed quality for innovation? It is knowledge, and industrial education is precisely the most efficient way for a person to accumulate a lot of knowledge.

In fact, the origin of industrialized education is Prussian education.

The popular K 12 education system was invented by Prussians. It is characterized by emphasizing division of labor, discipline and stability, and organizing students to participate in unified learning after strict division according to semester and age.

This educational system has trained a large number of industrial talents for Germany and has become the starting point of Germany's economic take-off.

Only Germany has risen three times in the world, the first time Prussia unified Germany, the second time after World War I and the third time after World War II.

The secret of Germany's third rise is to have a group of high-quality talents trained by industrial education.

Uniforms, strict school rules, and European schools are also paramilitary.

Later, the Soviets learned this experience and transformed it into a stricter "exam-oriented education" system that we see today.

China people learned this kind of "industrialization education" from the Soviet Union.

Its greatest contribution is to train a large number of people into qualified industrial workers from a backward agricultural country with a huge volume at the lowest cost, the shortest time and the lowest price.

Another feature of industrialized education is what we often call fairness.

The assembly line operation in industry can be mastered by everyone after training; As long as you are willing to work hard, every student can learn the knowledge of industrial education.

Of course, the "assembly line" mentioned here does not mean that college students actually work as Foxconn assembly line workers, but the main production form in China at this stage.

China is in the late stage of industrialization, and the main social resources are allocated around the core of industrialization. Even if you don't work as a worker, other supporting industries have high requirements for standardization.

Don't regard the China factory as Foxconn's assembly line. Engineers in factories are also important.

And it has a large number of industries, which is quite good for China.

As mentioned earlier, the German market economy, the German government is deliberately suppressing the financial industry, and has always adhered to the manufacturing industry. At present, the output value of German manufacturing accounts for 20.83% of GDP, which is much higher than the average level of developed countries.

Because of this, every time there is an economic crisis in the world, Germany suffers the least damage and recovers the fastest.

When British Prime Minister Blair asked why the German economy was so strong, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said this meaningful sentence: "At least we are still making things in Germany."

Therefore, industrialization, standardization and assembly line are not derogatory terms. These are the real faces of manufacturing.

China is called a pulverizer in developed countries. Once produced in China, many things become cabbage prices, which are good and cheap, so developed countries do not rely on technology monopoly to make money.

Graphene, which is needed for tires, bulletproof equipment and lubricating oil, was once a high-end material. In the international market, 5000 yuan a gram. In 2065,438+03, Ningbo built a production line with an annual capacity of 3 million tons, and the cost of graphene was reduced to one gram in 3 yuan. .......

15 years ago, a switchboard in the communication industry was sold abroad for 200,000 years. Domestic enterprises put into production before 10, and the price dropped to 10,000 five years later. Most European and American manufacturers closed down.

The reducer used in the mill in the cement plant was sold abroad for 10000000 sets, and the price was only 3 million after localization, so the foreign large reducer manufacturers were finished.

In the integrated circuit industry, all the 8086 chips needed by computers in the early 1980s needed to be imported. Now the price is 5 yuan, and the cost is almost zero. At that time, China could only buy at a high price internationally. When a microelectronics institute makes a 0.6um integrated circuit production process, the market price drops to 5 yuan today. ......

New energy market, 20 10, China imports alkane gas, and the international market price is 45,000kg. Then we worked hard to cultivate a domestic supplier in Fujian, and the price of alkane gas dropped to 28,000.

In 2004, the market price of 15 inch panel was US$ 260, and the investment of China government in LCD panel industry was US$10 billion. Now the price of a 50-inch super-large panel is only 180 USD ... while the price of a 15-inch panel is only 60 USD. ....

20 10 the national development and reform commission approved the construction of 50 subway lines in 35 cities. At the same time, the foreign price is 600 billion, and we only need 400 billion after localization. This 400 billion can create at least 400,000 jobs.

This is the capability of China industry.

With what? Of course, he is a high-quality engineer trained by industrial education. .

China high-speed rail is a very typical example, and the success of China high-speed rail is summarized as "China high-speed rail model" by some scholars.

We are taking advantage of China's super-large-scale market to attract three or four of the best high-speed rail companies in the world and spend a lot of money to buy your technology, but you have to transfer this part of the technology to me. After the technology came, China organized hundreds of thousands of engineers to study these technologies, combined them, found out the advantages and disadvantages of each technology, and then surpassed them on this basis.

Many people say, no, China can't make an operating system or a chip.

In fact, it's not that China can't make an operating system, but that the operating system needs an ecology, and Americans have taken the lead in this respect. The operating system is not difficult to build, but it is difficult to cultivate the whole ecology, so it has nothing to do with technology.

So is the chip. It is not difficult to make them, but it is difficult to mass produce them. If there is no order, the chip you have spent money and energy on will only stay in the laboratory and will not be put on the market.

In this respect, Americans are also ahead. The chips made in Qualcomm will definitely be bought by enterprises, so there is no need to worry about the order.

On my conscience, China's industrialization education is really good.

18 On February 3rd, OECD released the test results of 20 18 PISA:

"In the World Cup known as the field of education, Singapore 15-year-old students slipped to second place. In a global school system research (test) called PISA, Singapore gave the first place in reading, mathematics and science to China. "

PISA test was first held by OECD in 2000, and then held every three years to test the reading, math and science abilities of students aged 15. In 20 18, 600,000 15-year-olds from 79 countries and regions around the world participated in PISA.

In fact, the ranking of China students in PISA has been very high, far exceeding the world average. This time it has just surpassed Singapore, which ranks first all the year round.

Of course, some people in China deny such achievements.

Actually, I think it's quite strange. Before, children in China took the Olympic math test, and some people said that it was not good for children.

Nowadays, children in China regard PISA as the number one in the world, and some people jump out and say it's not good.

This kind of article never appeared before the children in China won the first place in the world.

Are these people so disgusted with China? Anyway, in their eyes, China children did nothing wrong.

It is not easy for children in China to grow up in ruins.

Some people may ask, since education in China is so good, why do so many people want to send their children abroad?

You can't argue that people in western countries who skip quality education are really rich.

This is really indisputable. Just as Ma Yun said that making money is easy, I can't refute it. After all, he is the richest man in China. Who can say that he is wrong?

If someone believes that opening a Taobao shop can make money lying down, then I can only wish you good luck.

Those developed countries are richer than China, so we are so weak because of their poor education.

But we must be clear, which western developed countries became rich after implementing quality education, or did they become rich before implementing loose education?

Don't forget, industrial education was invented in Germany and originated in the west.

Only by understanding this order can we understand this truth.

Also, many people do send their children to study abroad.

But these children studying abroad fall into two categories.

One is to escape the hard work of domestic education, so go abroad to find happiness;

One is that domestic education is not strict enough, and they spend huge sums of money to enter private aristocratic schools in the west to train their children into elites.

The latter is not to find a happy education, but to make children suffer.

Some time ago, I screened a wave of primary school first-grade courses for Prince George, a 5-year-old British royal family, in the China parents circle:

Mathematics, English, French, science, history, geography, computer, drama, art, gymnastics, swimming, fencing, golf, pottery, ballet. ......

This is the elite education in the west. If you want to wear a crown, you must endure it. The prince has no happy childhood.

Of course, all this talk does not mean that education in China has no shortcomings.

What are the real shortcomings of education in China? It is also the word "industrialization". It's not what we used to think, such as lack of innovation ability, lack of team coordination ability, high scores and low energy.

Danish documentaries and PISA rankings show that children educated in China do not have the shortcomings we always thought.

What are the disadvantages of industrialized education?

It is when there is no goal and direction, we don't know what to do.

To put it bluntly, it's like, when there is no answer, students don't know how to answer.

In the assembly line under the industrial system, every worker has a clear goal. Whether screwing screws or welding wires, everyone's work content is very clear, just work hard towards the goal.

But if there is no goal, we will get into trouble.

When the new economy comes and the new model comes, we will be at a loss, because our education is to train certainty.

For example, high-speed rail needs innovation, but it has certain performance. We in China are good at this. As long as we are sure of one thing, we can always find the answer.

But before the high-speed rail, we didn't know how to build it in China.

China didn't invent the high-speed rail, we just made it better.

The greatest advantage of industrialized education is that we can build it if others can. But we can't create something that has never existed before. To put it bluntly, industrial education is not conducive to students inventing new things.

Why didn't Apple's mobile phone appear in China? Because it never appeared. This is a new variety.

Before Apple came out, people in China didn't expect to make smart phones without buttons.

But after the smart phone came out, the advantages of China's industrialized education system came out. You see, there are only three mobile phones made in the world. China, the United States, South Korea and South Korea only have Samsung. We have Huawei, Xiaomi, oppo, vivo and Voice in China (the king of mobile phones in Africa, accounting for 50% of the mobile phone market in Africa).

We are good at innovating on the basis of what we have. We can't create without it.

This is the shortcoming of industrial education.

China can't live without Jobs because of education.

If the west can do it, so can we. However, before it was made in the west, there was no such thing in the world, and there was no way for China people trained by the industrialized education system.

The disadvantage of industrialized education is to change it, but not to skip quality education.

Instead, we should maintain the advantages of industrialized education, and at the same time let students contact the real society, meet new objects and encourage new ideas.

In this respect, the experimental courses of physics and chemistry are very suitable for inspiring students to discover and invent new things.

Therefore, I am more in favor of the school to increase the newly discovered experimental classes through observation experiments, rather than adding so-called quality education such as music classes, dance classes and football classes.

China can also enjoy the bonus of engineers trained by the 20-year industrialized education system, and reinvent the technology that has been invented by existing developed countries, which is better and cheaper than them.

China can also become a developed country along the road of developed country pulverizer. That's why Germany rose three times. Cars were not invented by Germans, but the cars made in Germany are the best in the world.

But after that? China can't always chase after others' asses, and one day China will run to the front. By then, the whole world will be waiting to see the new inventions and discoveries of Chinese people, and we will be embarrassed.

However, China has one advantage, that is, it has a large population. There is always a high probability that someone will think outside the industrialized education system. You see, under such a rigid education system in ancient times, four great inventions can be made.

Many people are good, but they have advantages.

We should maintain the advantage of population, effectively improve the overall population quality by using industrialized education, let those talented teenagers jump out of the original education system, and provide conditions for them to give full play to their talents.

It is the most ideal educational model in China at present.

American high school student Wilson wants to build a nuclear reactor, but he can't teach it in high school.

Nevada State University Reno will provide top students in high schools with the instruments and laboratories needed for research. Wilson built a nuclear reactor there with the help of a university physics professor.

At the age of 14, Wilson became the third person in the world to complete the nuclear fusion reaction, and he was the youngest.