The transformation of public schools into education groups refers to the establishment of an education group by public schools, with high-quality schools as the leader, to carry out unified management in education concepts, school management, information technology, education evaluation and school property management, so as to realize the sharing of high-quality resources such as optimizing teachers' equipment and promote the balanced development of education.

This model can mobilize high-quality resources, let teachers form a mentoring relationship, promote teachers' development, and integrate high-quality educational resources to achieve unified management.

Advantages of transforming public schools into educational groups;

1. The school is large in scale, standardized, rich in teachers and rich in educational resources, which will not affect teaching because of emergencies, greatly ensuring the quality of education and ensuring students' learning.

2. Running schools in groups can promote the high-quality and balanced development of education, improve the quality of education and teaching, enrich the connotation construction of schools, and realize resource sharing and complementary advantages.

The disadvantages of public schools becoming educational groups;

1. The school is not flexible.

2. The evaluation mechanism is unreasonable.

3. Group-run schools are too pursuing "big and complete", pursuing scale and quantity, ignoring quality and characteristics.

4. The construction of school culture lags behind.

5. Running schools in groups has limited teachers' professional development to some extent.

6. There are some management problems in running schools in groups.

7. In the group-run school, there is a relationship of competition and cooperation between branch schools, but this kind of competition and cooperation sometimes brings some negative effects.

8. Running schools in groups may bring some legal and moral problems, such as malicious competition between branches and false propaganda.

9. Running a school in groups may have a certain negative impact on the school brand.

10. Running schools in groups may bring some management difficulties, such as inefficient decision-making and uneven resource allocation.

1 1. Running schools in groups may have some negative effects on school culture, such as cultural homogenization.

12. Running schools in groups may bring some economic problems, such as financial risks and high costs.

13. Running schools in groups may bring some social problems, such as the decline of social recognition and the lack of social responsibility. 14. Running a school in groups may have a certain negative impact on the school brand.