First of all, the so-called inspirational speeches of the Education Group are often not of a public welfare nature, but require schools to pay a certain fee to the Education Group, which will send "professional lecturers" to give lectures to students within the Group. It can be seen that the so-called inspirational speech has a strong commercial purpose.
Secondly, the "routines" used in this kind of inspirational speech are similar, and the short-term "brainwashing" effect can be achieved by binding the quality of academic performance with whether parents are grateful, forced to encourage, excessively sensational and noisy live sound effects. What they need is not long-term and effective learning incentives for their classmates, but to make everyone a guilty person who is affected in the meeting. As for whether the students can remember this speech in the future, and whether they can gain something other than emotional fluctuations from this speech, the education group does not care.
Moreover, this kind of so-called inspirational speech can bring little incentive to students. Encouraged by emotional rendering, students can only maintain the "chicken blood" state in a specific atmosphere, but once the environment changes, students will change their state because of the lack of atmosphere.
Only a speech based on knowledge content, learning methods and scientific psychology can truly let students get truly valuable content. This kind of forced brainwashing speech is just a chicken rib that makes students get nothing.