I have been engaged in education for seven years. At first, like many teachers, they attached great importance to imparting knowledge. They feel sorry for their classmates who can't cooperate with their studies in class, can't finish their homework on time, and even sacrifice their spare time to accompany them to make up their homework, for fear that their grades will not be satisfactory in the exam. Students are unhappy because they study hard. Mr. Confucius told us long ago: "If you don't get angry, you won't get angry." Even so, should we give up some children and wait for them to learn? What if some people are not interested in language and literature all their lives? So unhappy study has become our temporary placebo, and we continue to go further and further on the road of asking every child to read a good culture class.

Now that I think about it, we only consider the subjects we teach, perhaps this foothold is too narrow. There are so many subjects in the school, what is the significance of setting these subjects? Cultivating students' comprehensive quality in an all-round way certainly plays a role in this respect, but in today's view, students should be provided with as broad a platform and opportunities as possible to let them know themselves!