When it comes to education in China, the most striking thing is, of course, the difference in admission scores for the college entrance examination. At that time, Mr. Zhang found that Guangdong students needed more than 700 points to go to Peking University, and Beijing students needed more than 500 points, which was one or two hundred points short. She lamented the inequality of citizens' right to education, and asked students to analyze problems and write articles to invite social discussion. Although Mr. Zhang didn't understand the difference between the standard score and the original score, there was a big difference in admission scores among provinces. In 2004, the Ministry of Education began to let the provinces write their own questions, which to some extent avoided the topic of different admission scores-different papers could not be compared. But everyone knows that inequality is inequality. What is the most direct solution? It seems that the household registration system has been destroyed. However, the problem is that the abolition of the household registration system and the determination of the examination place according to the criteria such as student status and parents' habitual residence have only solved the problems of a small number of people and failed to achieve real equality. Who are these little people? For example, colleagues in Zhang Quanling, such as Zhongxian cadres who immigrated to the college entrance examination. This practice is only to draw more rich people into the circle of enjoying unequal educational resources and calm their grievances. It doesn't mean much to ordinary children, because even if Beijing's household registration is open to the whole country, their parents can't support them to go to school in Beijing. Cancel the household registration, what about the national unified score line? I think people are forced out, and it is not necessarily that students in Beijing and Shanghai are born with poor test-taking ability. I'm really not sure who will be admitted once I get my grades, because compared with other places, there are all good teachers in Beijing and Shanghai, and the exam is several grades higher than ordinary places. In fact, for China, a big country with unbalanced development, like many other things, education equality has a long way to go. Why is it so long? There are many reasons. Draw a profile. Education should be equal. From the software point of view, at least the teachers in different places should be roughly equal (I mean the education before university), but the teachers in big cities are far better than those in small places, and even the good teachers in small places are desperately moving to big cities. Many years ago, the headmaster even led a group of good teachers to apply for jobs in good coastal schools. This has played a very negative role in small local education, but we can't expect people to flow downwards. We expect teachers to be poor and happy. Don't those law professors who advocate educational equity also travel from all over the country to Beijing for development? Everyone wants to enjoy success. After understanding human nature, it is better to be modest and talk less. However, big problems are easy to blow but not easy to solve, and small problems are easy to solve but not easy to blow. So people often blow up big problems without solving small problems. If you are thirsty, just throw "this is a system problem" and you will be done. But in fact, we can use our own strength to promote equality in a small environment first. For example, a friend said that "Guangzhou public minority kindergartens receive huge subsidies". If it is true, I think it can be a focus. Don't the media in the Southern Department like criticism very much? Starting from this small criticism, many such small problems have been solved, which is an advantage. At the same time, China's economy continues to develop, and the problem of education equity in China will naturally be solved. This is an article with a big hat and a small body. Finally, I will talk about two specific small problems. First of all, I don't agree with the practice of the Ministry of Education to let the provinces give questions. In my opinion, under the condition of unequal education, this is even more unfavorable for students in small places in various provinces. Because there was only one Beijing in the country before, at least 3 1 Beijing cities have emerged in the country-the college entrance examination proposition work in all provinces is monopolized by provincial capitals and developed cities.