Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Why are the children of some university professors all scum and can't even get into the undergraduate course?
Why are the children of some university professors all scum and can't even get into the undergraduate course?
This is normal, just like children in rural mountain villages and parents' primary education can also be admitted to key universities. However, I believe that many teachers and educated children are good. After all, teachers are more experienced. However, everything is not absolute. It is wrong for parents to have only primary school education and not be admitted to university. In principle, parents' education is related, but the most important thing is to rely on the children themselves.

Better than Professor Zheng Qiang of Taiyuan University of Technology, the child was expelled three times, changed schools, and there was a "Waterloo" in parenting. So it is possible to say that the children of some university professors are scum.

Seeing this problem, I think of a similar saying. College graduates are all working for bosses who have never been to college, and some people do not advocate the theory that reading is useless, which is the same as the topic that some university professors' children are scum. These statements focus on individual cases of success or failure, but ignore most of them. For example, the children of university professors are academic scum, because their parents are at the peak of their studies, so their failures are magnified.

University professors are also parents, and the professional aura is there. In fact, parents have a great influence on their children's academic performance, but ultimately it depends on their attitude towards learning. Children are not careful, and their parents have higher education. Even if you are in the front line of education, you may be powerless, which is why the children of university professors are scum.

This situation may not only be left behind by the children of university professors, but also be placed in the teachers' homes in any school period. Some teachers have done a good job in education and teaching, and have strong working ability, but they may not be able to start from their own children. This is the case with one of my children. His father, a junior high school math teacher, won the title of teaching expert, but he has been at the bottom of the class. His father has broken his heart for him, greeted the class teacher, and even transferred him to his own teaching class, but his grades have not improved. In the end, he was admitted to only one university.

Although it seems to outsiders that university professors are relaxed, they are not. Although university professors may not have teaching tasks, other requirements are quite high, and the pressure of scientific research also exists. After all, university professors are usually the heads of research groups, but they still have to run enterprises and travel to pull projects. So, it may be true that there is no time to take care of children. Without parental discipline, children's poor grades are traceable.

However, during my college years, I contacted university teachers and heard of them. Basically, the children of university teachers are excellent. Because their parents are university teachers, they still have advantages in educating their children, and most of them are very diligent in education, so they are basically excellent.

What's so strange about this? Is there a difference between the children of university professors and those of others? The ancients also knew that "generals have no seeds." Analysis of the reasons, roughly the following points:

1. Let's talk about university professors first. As a university professor, there is no denying the talent of this man. Not everyone can become a university professor by hard work alone. However, there are many talented people, but few people become university professors. This is naturally linked to the need for personal diligence, and no matter how hard you work, you can't succeed. This is the simplest truth. However, even university professors can only be experts in a certain field. It is impossible for every university professor to be a "generalist" in cultivating talents. Why else do so many primary and secondary school teachers need it?

As I said just now, the success of professors depends on talent and diligence, and so do children. Moreover, even if the child is diligent, there is no guarantee that he has the talent to be a father.

3. Educational methods and methods. As I said before, professors in universities specialize in technical fields, but educating children is not necessarily an expert. This phenomenon is like a doctor can't cure his own disease. Especially if your child misbehaves, the child will have rebellious psychology, which will definitely make the professor very helpless.

However, according to my observation, working in a university, it should be said that it is not bad for teachers' children to be admitted to the university. Children live on the university campus and they are exposed to it. First of all, they have a good learning atmosphere. After all, there are only a few children who fail to live up to expectations, which is normal and not surprising.

IQ belongs to mitochondrial inheritance, and cerebral cortex cells come from cell mitochondria, while sperm has no mitochondria, which means it belongs to maternal inheritance.

There are two conditions for learning well: high IQ and love of learning. If you don't have enough IQ and don't like learning, you will definitely not learn well; I have a low IQ, love to learn, and I can learn well if I spend a lot of time, but time waits for no one. Teachers spend so much time teaching and extracurricular time, and people need to have a rest and can't keep up with the rhythm. The longer the delay, the limited test time, and there is not so much time for you to take your time.

If you have a high IQ and don't study hard, you won't learn well. Learning is a process of fighting against forgetting. Who creates perfection? Even if you are smart, unfamiliar with the questions and have limited examination time, you can't take your time!

Only if you have high IQ, strong learning ability, study hard, master all kinds of knowledge points skillfully, do more questions, integrate and do them skillfully, can you get high marks in the exam and become a master of learning.

Children who have been educated for the exam spend too much time on sea tactics. We should reduce the years of basic education in primary and secondary schools, let talented teenagers get in touch with university education as soon as possible, and engage in scientific research after doctoral graduation as soon as possible. Middle-aged doctor in the province! Wasted genius resources.

It depends on how a university professor becomes a professor. If the university professor is not smart, it is the result of acquired efforts, then his children should also be diligent. If they don't know how to be diligent, they may become scum. If a university professor has talent, his children will have good genes, not bad. Some people say that Xueba is cultivated from an early age, but I believe Xueba is born. My hometown neighbors, ancestors were landlords, and there were people with high education at that time. Influenced by the composition, their parents' life is not good, and they have hardly attended any schools. Some of them didn't finish primary school, but they did well in school. Many children, family difficulties, some go to school, and some drop out of school before finishing their studies. Whether you drop out of school or not, your grades are getting better and better. Grandchildren are also good learners, because they are all famous universities with good economic conditions. Living in the countryside, I know nothing about education. Are free-range. I am also curious to ask if there are any good educational tricks. The answer is that I haven't asked them. It can be said that they are all born and raised schoolmasters. Even married daughters, their offspring are better than one. Some people say that human graves are good. I'm not superstitious. I believe in science. This is probably a genetic problem.

I don't agree with the term "scum"

I don't agree with "one size fits all"!

Thirty years ago, the children of university professors were admitted to undergraduate courses, just like the children of many ordinary people in society: "Thousands of troops and horses walk on a single-plank bridge", and not many people succeeded.

Take Zhongnan University of Economics and Law as an example, there are only a handful of undergraduates who teach their children.

Today, with the development of history, universities have expanded their enrollment, and all kinds of college students are "various". Undergraduates are no longer scarce. Children who teach either study at home or abroad.

The professor's children become "scum", almost none!

My aunt, who can't even write her own name, hasn't studied all day, but her children are all college students. The other is a doctoral student who was admitted to a famous university in Beijing.

Although there is a high probability that if parents are knowledgeable, their children's academic performance should not be bad. However, there are many exceptions. I've seen parents are teachers, but children are scum.

Educating children is actually a very complicated matter. It is not necessarily that parents with high academic qualifications can educate good children. It is by no means that a person with a high degree of education represents a good character, and he is excellent.

Almost all excellent children are because of their good family style. When I say excellent children here, I don't just mean simply getting good grades.

In my eyes, excellent children are upright, virtuous, filial to their parents, educated, self-motivated and hardworking. Such children, regardless of their academic qualifications, will not have a bad life.

I met many parents, trained my children into talents, and even went abroad to study. However, the child has no gratitude to his parents. After asking blindly, I got married and left my parents.

The biggest misunderstanding of those parents is that they only care about teaching their children to become talents and forget to teach them how to be human.

Even university professors, some people don't know how to educate their children. Either you are too strict, or you like children too much. Neither extreme can educate children well.

A relative and his wife both rented stalls in the market to sell vegetables, and the whole family made a living from it. My daughter and son both graduated from graduate school. The year before last, my daughter took part in the teacher recruitment examination and became a famous primary school teacher. My son graduated last year and took a vocational exam. Now doing finance in the First Hospital of the City is an iron rice bowl. Whenever relatives who have happy events get together, they will have a chat. Although the couple's culture is not high, I think they must have other qualities that affect their children. For example, the couple are hardworking, earnest and childlike. Perhaps children look in their eyes and internalize them as role models and motivation for children to learn.

Why are the children of some university professors all scum, and they can't even pass the undergraduate course, but they are [cute] [cute] [cute]! Not only is it an idealistic mistake, but it also wants to lead everyone astray!

You first use the premise of "some university professors", and then introduce "their children are scum, and they can't even get into the undergraduate course". What's the point of this subjective assumption and provocation? I can say it the other way around: "Some uneducated parents, but their children are extremely energetic and finally admitted to a prestigious school." Do you think this is inevitable, necessary, sufficient or a necessary and sufficient condition?

University professor, Kochi of course. This is his own struggle for identity, but this does not mean that the professor's children will be admitted to undergraduate universities or even prestigious schools like being born with dragons and phoenixes, dragons and phoenixes and mice. One of the most crucial is education. Education itself and students are not only the upbringing and education of parents, but also the habits of self-cognition, thinking and behavior of each child and everyone.

In fact, the dialectical and objective development of anything and even people is undoubtedly a systematic project, and it is a subject-object process in which many factors move and balance each other. Asking questions impersonally and ideally is confusing thinking and talking nonsense.

I am a university teacher, and so is my father. During the 22~40 years' common knowledge change in the same university campus, I have certainly seen many two opposite examples mentioned in the second paragraph. Not all the university professors around me can go to undergraduate universities as they wish, or even waste their lives. No one wants to witness or even see this phenomenon and result. Every year, there are 4-5,000 students in two universities (one for one, one for a higher vocational school, and two for others). I have so many contacts with my classmates inside and outside teaching and in my life that even many university teachers and you can't imagine. Because of this, I have a deeper foundation and practice than you.

For university professors, before the enrollment expansion of the college entrance examination in 1999, many children failed to enter the undergraduate course. However, in this era, it is very rare to fail to enter a university, especially an undergraduate course. But no matter who you are, you shouldn't care who your parents are, but when the child's father is a professor, it really makes people doubt that the child's father is actually a professor, and some people even gloat. However, that is their father and son's own problem, and of course it is also the child's own problem. Because of him, she is the subject of contradiction. Internal cause comes first, and external cause can only work through internal cause, which goes without saying at all.

Having said that, I emphasize once again that the development of things is not quantitative change but qualitative change, and it is a multi-directional and all-round interaction, which deserves everyone's attention-what have you done and played a role in children's education and even the social system?

It is not surprising that the children of university professors are scum. Parents are university professors, just to prove the knowledge and academic achievements of adults, and children naturally cannot become schoolmasters.

Learning to bully is not a natural inheritance, but an effort. Generally speaking, with normal intelligence, good desire to learn and correct learning methods, it should not be a problem to be admitted to the university.

There are various reasons for a person's poor academic performance, but students with good academic performance must be diligent and learn correctly.

There is a high probability that parents are highly educated and have a learning atmosphere at home. Children's academic performance will not be bad when they are in contact with each other since childhood.

I am a university teacher. What I see is that under the example of parents, most of the children around me love learning and do well in the college entrance examination. Many of them were admitted to 985,265,438+065,438+0.

Of course, there are also children with poor grades, and the proportion of taking three exams or junior college is very small.

The children of university teachers, whether bullies or scum, have family, school and personal reasons.