It is said that education is anti-human because human nature itself doesn't want to learn, doesn't want to obey the rules and is lazy, and education requires students to keep learning.
No matter whether the anti-human education itself is correct or not, what is the purpose of anti-human education? And why does it exist?
In fact, the purpose can be understood as human nature suitable for others; It exists because the human nature of parents or teachers who educate their children requires them to achieve their desired goals by opposing their children's nature.
Therefore, education is not anti-humanity, even if there are anti-humanity elements, it is only the humanity of the educated, and its purpose is to conform to the humanity of educators and others.
If the above statement is more reliable, then the so-called management is anti-human, which is self-evident. However, we should pay attention to what is the purpose of management, that is, to conform to one's own humanity by violating others' humanity, and whether the purpose has really been achieved?
If we look at various junk education models, we may find more. Suffering from junk education, do you want your children and grandchildren to be the same? Is it true that you can't change, or is your humanity telling you that you don't want to change because you are afraid of what you are doing to balance the interests between your comfort and safety and the happiness of your children and grandchildren?
The so-called emotional intelligence is actually the confrontation and balance between individual humanity and others' humanity.