Why do people say that a child often has no family education rather than no upbringing?
First of all, family education refers to the education given to children by the family. From this perspective, it is not difficult to see that saying that a child has no tutor is actually a very harsh rhetoric.
Because this is not only to say that children are not sensible, but also to say that their parents.
After all, there is no word "tutor", but parents' education of their children is not in place. So when people are in a hurry, they will say that their children have no tutor.
Secondly, we pay attention to the inheritance of bloodline. Every word and deed of the younger generation represents the education of the older generation. As the saying goes, there is always a girl. Therefore, children's words and deeds are miniature parents.
If children seem too powerless to make trouble, then people generally think that parents are basically the same.
Parents' words and deeds will also come from the words and deeds of the previous generation. After the baptism of time, the word mentor will be handed down slowly.
Therefore, from a big perspective, family education represents the education of the whole family. This shows that the content of family education is very serious and profound.
As for why there is no education, it is easy to understand. In ancient times, you had to worship a teacher three times and nine times, so one day you will be a teacher and a father for life.
However, in today's open society, this educational concept has been gradually abandoned. Teachers are more about preaching and giving lessons to solve doubts and are no longer responsible for what parents say.
Imagine if you were angry, would you say his parents or his teacher?
Most people will choose the one that is closely related. So the word mentor is widely mentioned.
Finally, I hope everyone can do less hurtful things. Sometimes, if we talk less, the world will be more peaceful. After all, there is a reason for the disaster to come from the mouth. ?