The basic connotation of seeking truth is to respect science and pursue truth. Fundamentally speaking, seeking truth means proceeding from reality, seeking truth from facts, boldly upholding the truth and fearlessly correcting mistakes. In the educational function of science and technology to the whole society, seeking truth has become a basic common sense, and everyone understands the significance of this scientific spirit to life. However, in real social life, it is not easy for a person to consistently put this attitude of seeking truth from facts into action. Therefore, ethics often regards the unity of people's realistic spirit, attitude and behavior as a higher virtue or virtue.

Indeed, seeking truth from facts should become the universal virtue of mankind. However, in the field of social governance, when we think about this virtue, we think it should be stipulated as the responsibility and obligation of social managers. Because, even in the field of modern social governance, there is still a systematic power mechanism, and the needs of power itself sometimes contradict and conflict with objective facts. In this case, there is still a long way to go for a social manager to respect objective facts or obey power. Therefore, understanding from the height of virtue is not helpful to carry forward the realistic virtue of managers in modern society. At the same time, if virtue is a subjective understanding of moral existence, then the rulers of modern society can take their subjective will as the basis for whether they have realistic virtue, which obviously conflicts with the essence of modern social governance that embodies political civilization. Therefore, only by defining truth-seeking as a kind of responsibility and obligation can managers in modern society be required to undertake it as an ethical bottom line.

Seeking truth is often understood as the pursuit of truth, especially according to the thinking framework of modern epistemology, seeking truth and seeking truth have equivalent meanings. However, if "truth" is understood as "truth", we can see that there are roughly two kinds of truth, one is scientific truth; The other is ethical truth. The discovery of scientific truth is the result of cognition, and all theories, disciplines and practical principles built around scientific truth are suitable for the framework of epistemological thinking. The formation of scientific activities, social activities and social structure in modern society is carried out in accordance with the epistemological thinking framework of pursuing scientific truth. As a result, ethical truth is ignored, and the social structure and social life reconstructed in the pursuit of scientific truth become deformed, formalized and one-sided. Sound society and social life should also include the pursuit of ethical truth. Only social activities that include both the pursuit of scientific truth and ethical truth belong to the category of seeking truth from facts.

The responsibility and obligation of modern social managers to choose reality is actually to introduce the spirit of exploration and innovation into modern social governance. A fundamental defect of the management-oriented social governance model is the rigidity of the governance model. Because the management-oriented social governance pursues external and mandatory standardization, all the actions of the rulers are subject to the normative constraints of the governance system. Specific governance activities are faced with complex and changeable reality, and the relatively determined general norms of governance system will inevitably conflict with reality. In this conflict, the rulers are required to act according to the principles of universal norms, which not only stifles their enthusiasm for seeking truth from facts, but also loses their enthusiasm for exploring and innovating. In modern social governance, when a modern social manager assumes realistic responsibilities and obligations, he will realistically treat the urgent problems in modern social governance activities. When the normative factors are consistent with reality, his social governance activities belong to routine and procedural work. When conflicts arise, he will explore in the spirit of seeking truth from facts and make creative behavior choices, thus giving vitality to the whole social governance system and making it never rigid.

The acceptance of realistic responsibilities and obligations by modern social managers means that modern social managers must stay away from and oppose all false and exaggerated behaviors. Historical experience has proved that falsehood and exaggeration are most likely to breed in the public sphere, and modern social governance is bound to be contaminated by this legacy, and there will be problems such as fraud, red tape and * * *. For this reason, highlighting the realistic responsibilities and obligations of managers in modern society is a necessary way to eradicate the false and grandiose ills in the public sphere. Moreover, assuming the responsibility and obligation of seeking truth from facts can make modern social managers have a good professional character, that is, show a down-to-earth and pragmatic work style in modern social governance activities.

What does reality mean?

Be realistic

Qi Baishi

Seeking truth from facts: advocating the spirit of ~.

What does be worthy of the name mean?

I have never seen this idiom before, but literally: give up, you can give up or discard the name, you can seek fame, you can seek reason, you can seek truth, so it can be understood as: give up reputation and pursue truth. Metaphor is a person's noble character.

What is reality?

Source: American Information Network; The taunt of Nash by the author of the game Bible

Classic quotes of game bible writers; 0, 1, two-dimensional average is called equilibrium, 0, 1, 2, three-dimensional average is called equilibrium.

In the system of 0, 1 and two-dimensional recording, 0, 1 and these two winning and losing particles must form the basic unit in the game process. Von Neumann found that there is a "minimax theorem" (minimax theorem means extreme losing or extreme winning). The future of these two kinds of particles is not affected by any particle events in the past. 0, 1, the expectation that the two kinds of particles tend to be balanced has been completely denied by the minimax theorem.

In the system of random motion of 0, 1 and two-dimensional particles, there is only average, and there is no average law, that is, there is no three-dimensional balance. Classic quotes of game bible writers; Policy, which does not exist in 0, 1, two-dimensional system. 0, 1, two-dimensional irrational number, two-dimensional system without winning or losing. As soon as Nash equilibrium was put forward, it was belittled, ridiculed and flatly denied by von Neumann on the spot.

Speaking of Nash equilibrium, a reporter asked Nash to explain his theory in popular language. Nash said; Nash equilibrium is not profound. It's like a poker game invented by China and played by three people. Nash equilibrium is a simple three-person game. There are so many people playing poker in China for so many years, and Nash equilibrium reminds people in China for more than half a century. No one in China has found that there is a' balanced advantage theory' in poker games played by three people. People can't help asking; Nash, how many times has he played poker for three by himself? Who does he play with? How did he find a balance? How does the equilibrium theory prevail unilaterally? Why didn't he describe China's poker game in all his articles? A deck of poker is played by three people, and one person has 18 cards. How is it balanced? In more than 60 years, no one has seen him, using China's poker to show what non-cooperative Nash equilibrium is and what is the dominant strategy of Nash equilibrium. He didn't show any actual performance or give a clear theoretical explanation, which greatly disappointed those who pay attention to the dominant strategy. Classic quotes of game bible writers; In Nash equilibrium theory, scientists have not found any signs of game dominance strategy.

Classic quotes of game bible writers; The strategy comes from the natural properties of 0, 1, 2 and 3-D structures. Particle, private turbulence, entity, particle for short, turbulence, body. It is a standard model for winning games and calculating unilateral advantage strategies.

In Nash's philology, the concepts of 0,/kloc-0, 2 and three-dimensional equilibrium have never appeared. Where does Nash equilibrium come from?

Classic quotes of game bible writers; Nash equilibrium theory has no clear statement. Nash Equilibrium is a product forged by the United States, which has spread all over the world, and of course, all over China. The essence of "Nash equilibrium" is a humiliation to China people's IQ and spirit of discovery, invention and creation.

Classic quotes of game bible writers; Two-dimensional balance refers to the competitive behavior of organisms, and three-dimensional balance refers to the advantages and disadvantages of nature.

Classic quotes of game bible writers; Uncover the skin of Nash equilibrium and reveal the truth. If Nash equilibrium is a game theory term named after Nash; If I remove Nash's name, there is only the word equilibrium, which is a pure game theory term; If Nash's name is removed from all game theory articles, only equilibrium remains; Look at another game theory article, which is also about the word balance; It is found that the whole article is illogical, semantic variation and unintelligible; As long as it belongs to the theoretical article of Nash equilibrium, after removing Nash's name, the ghost of Nash appears; Catch the wind and catch the shadows, spread the truth with false information, and embellish it like crazy talk, which is even more incomprehensible to ordinary people.

Classic quotes of game bible writers; Nash-Nash equilibrium-equilibrium. Nash equilibrium is the same, that is; A donkey's mouth is a horse's mouth.

Classic quotes of game bible writers; Nash equilibrium is haunted because Nash himself doesn't know what Nash equilibrium is, and his layman pretends to know Nash equilibrium. "Nash equilibrium" turned all disciples into mental illness and became ignorant and pretentious; Anyone who says Nash equilibrium is like falling into the devil's pit. Opening his mouth means asking himself and answering himself, talking to himself, being willful and puzzled, and he will still justify himself. Classic quotes of game bible writers; Nash ......

What is reality?

It is reality. .

What is scientific and realistic?

Scientific and realistic spirit and exploration spirit;

Pay attention to practice, study hard and pursue the scientific spirit unremittingly. Actively observe, practice, think, communicate and reflect, and build your own knowledge from personal experience and thinking, thus improving learning efficiency. In addition, we should exercise our thinking, be good at imagination and be logical, and cultivate our interest in science.

Seeking truth; What do you mean?

Yes is the meaning of truth, which means the meaning of truth. The whole word means to get to the bottom of one thing or one thing, get the truth, get the truth.

Seeking truth from facts [what]

Seeking truth from facts means starting from the actual object, exploring the internal relations of things and the regularity of their development, and understanding the essence of things.

[From] Hanshu Hejian Wang Xian Liu Dechuan: "Make the past serve the present and seek truth from facts."

What does it mean that knowledge makes people realistic and logic makes people realistic?

With knowledge, we can look at problems realistically, and through logical thinking and reasoning, we can distinguish between true and false.