Is it true to shorten the academic system? Domestic public opinion is more concerned about the reform of shortening the educational system. However, an in-depth analysis of the internal logic of education is not a good way to reform. At present, there is no choice to shorten the academic system. Is it true that the academic system is shortened?

Is it true that the academic system is shortened? 1 Recently, another news has stirred up the whole network, especially the parents in Shenzhen! Shorten the school system, four years in primary school, three years in junior high school and two years in senior high school, and bring senior high school into compulsory education, which is exactly nine years! Parents shouted great when they saw the news, and then the Education Bureau denied it. There was no official basis.

In fact, shortening the academic system has become a hot topic in recent years. According to the current years of education, the child's study time is at least 16 years, and if he goes to graduate school again, the time will be longer. Such a long time is really a great challenge for students and parents. Is it really necessary to shorten the academic system? I think there is. In fact, there may be many parents and students who want to shorten the academic system. The reason for this is the following：

1, China people have been studying hard for a long time.

The core reason of parents' anxiety about their children's education lies in the pressure of entering a higher school. A student has to face the big exams that affect the most important trend of life: the senior high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination. For the college entrance examination, the undergraduate admission rate is very high. What kind of undergraduate course can be admitted depends on the children's own efforts. Relatively speaking, the pressure will be less. So far, I haven't heard that a large number of students can't be admitted to universities.

The senior high school entrance examination directly determines the children's future path. All parents hope that their children can enter high school and have the opportunity to go to college. 50% students will be diverted to vocational schools and technical schools. In order to get into high school, off-campus training is particularly popular. Not only parents spend money and energy, but also students are tired. If children's grades are not good enough, they are particularly prone to anxiety. If high school can be included in compulsory education, anxiety will be greatly reduced, and off-campus training may be greatly cooled.

2, the study time is too long, and I have to run for three years after graduation.

Studying for a long time can also easily lead to the pressure of modern young people. According to normal calculation, I graduated from college at the age of 23. After working for a few years, getting married and having children, buying a house and a car will be very stressful. If you graduate from graduate school, you will graduate at the age of 26 and be 30 after working for 4 years. Why always pay attention to marriage? In fact, the graduation age will not only affect the marriage age, but also affect the childbearing age and population.

Suppose you graduate at the age of 26 and everything goes well. At the age of 30, you get married and have children. At this time, the pressure may be the greatest. There may be mortgages, car loans, and old people to support. The family has good economic conditions and may have two children. The reality is far from the above situation. In their thirties, they may not be able to afford a house or have the courage to get married and have children. The end result is obvious. Young people don't get married and have children. There are very few second children, let alone third children. If you get married and have children at the age of 35, the children at the age of 50 will be 15, and even fewer will have a second child.

Shorten the academic system, will students really never finish their studies?

In fact, according to the current outline, many contents are repetitive and may be shortened. Besides, students don't have much knowledge and dig too deep. In order to get a higher score, the difficulty of the questions usually done has increased a lot, and parents can't help at all. The difficulty is not the same as that of 20 years ago. The selection mechanism of senior high school entrance examination makes it more and more difficult for students to learn knowledge.

If students can distinguish according to their level, then students will not be so miserable. For example, those with high mathematics level go to school deeply, while those with low mathematics level go to school shallowly. Through differentiated teaching, students can find their own advantages and interests, so the willingness to divert students may be higher.

abstract

Although the idea of shortening the academic system is beautiful, it is actually impossible to realize it in a short time. Shortening the academic system is a systematic project, which involves not only the redesign of the curriculum and the design of the student diversion mechanism, but also the construction of the teaching staff and the capital investment in the educational infrastructure. These problems are not simple, so it is impossible to shorten the academic system in a short time.

Is it true to shorten the academic system? Recently, the official website of the Ministry of Education announced the Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Education on Establishing the Experimental Zone for Comprehensive Reform of Basic Education of the Ministry of Education. After research, it was decided to set up experimental zones for comprehensive reform of basic education of the Ministry of Education in Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Chengdu, Sichuan, Langfang, Hebei, Changzhi, Shanxi, Changzhou, Jiangsu, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Tongling, Anhui, Sanming, Fujian, Yichang, Hubei, xi 'an, Shaanxi and Zhucheng, Shandong. The notice also stated that all localities should conscientiously implement the plan in accordance with the implementation plan, continuously deepen the comprehensive reform of basic education, and play a leading role in demonstration.

At the same time, the new minister's "new idea of teaching reform" is circulating on the Internet. Including: "shortening the academic system and changing it to nine-year compulsory education: four years in primary school, three years in junior high school and two years in senior high school. Cancel Xiaoshengchu and complete basic education before high school. " "The senior high school entrance examination is divided into special examinations, and children with specialties and characteristics are found as soon as possible, and they enter ordinary high schools, special high schools or vocational high schools according to their characteristics. Carry out diversified and characteristic training and adapt to social survival and work after graduation. " "Popularizing high schools is divided into extra high schools, ordinary high schools and vocational high schools. Move professional education to high school and combine basic education with professional education to facilitate the discovery and training of students with some disciplines and talents. " "University reform, more than one-third of universities have been transformed into engineering or senior blue-collar universities, specializing in training senior skilled workers and laying the foundation for industries 4 and 0." Wait a minute. Netizens said that the intensity and intensity of the reform are unprecedented.

The so-called "new concept of educational reform" is spread on the Internet.

Many people combine the establishment of an experimental zone for comprehensive reform of basic education with the above-mentioned major reforms, and make an orderly statement on shortening the academic system. However, it must be said that the so-called "new ideas of teaching reform" by the new Minister of Education is an illogical so-called large-scale reform measure issued in the name of the Minister of Education, which is totally unreliable. The reform of basic education is to deepen the reform of basic education and improve the quality of basic education according to a series of documents issued by the Central Office and the State Council.

These reform ideas are contradictory in themselves. Since the academic system has been shortened to nine-year compulsory education, why do you come to the senior high school entrance examination? How to build characteristic high schools and vocational high schools? Under the current compulsory education system, the "junior high school" has long been cancelled, and students are admitted to the nearest school without examination, including private schools, which also implement the "public" and "civilian" strokes and draw lots by computer. This reform proposition doesn't even know what compulsory education is. The basic characteristics of compulsory education are free, compulsory, balanced and compulsory. Admission to the nearest school is free. If high school is included in compulsory education, it is necessary to realize the balanced development of high school. If high schools are divided into special high schools, ordinary high schools and vocational high schools, how can they be included in compulsory education? In addition, as we all know, there is a "secondary vocational panic" among parents at present. In order to alleviate parents' anxiety, some people suggest shortening the school system and delaying the diversion. For example, shorten the academic system to 10 years, and the high school will not be diverted, and then it will be diverted after graduation. This "reform proposition" is to shorten the basic education to nine years, and continue to divert after graduating from junior high school. Is this aggravating anxiety or relieving anxiety?

However, some people still believe such a "new idea of reform" that can't stand scrutiny. It is said that under the influence of "new ideas of reform", the vocational education sector has soared, because this "new ideas of reform" has strengthened vocational education and accelerated students' entry into the labor market and become blue-collar. It not only solves the problem of declining birthrate, but also solves the problem of skilled talents gap.

This is a matter of course. Domestic public opinion is more concerned about the reform of shortening the educational system. However, an in-depth analysis of the internal logic of education is not a good way to reform the academic system. In the whole examination-oriented basic education, shortening the academic system will only increase the pressure on students, but will not alleviate the educational anxiety of society, let alone train talents early. To solve the current problems in basic education, we must reform the education evaluation system, clean up the education management and talent evaluation policies of grade education and schools, and not solve the problem of inferior vocational education. It is difficult to run a good education with temperature, whether it is delayed diversion or the integration of vocational education and general education. In order to guide colleges and universities to adhere to the orientation of vocational education and cultivate applied talents, vocational education must be regarded as the same type of education as general education to run schools effectively.

At present, the comprehensive reform of basic education in China has no option to shorten the educational system. High schools are divided into ordinary high schools and secondary vocational schools, so it is unrealistic to include high schools in compulsory education. Free high school education and compulsory high school education are different concepts. Incorporate high schools into compulsory education, or all high schools are ordinary high schools, or all high schools are comprehensive high schools with academic qualifications and technical and vocational courses, and develop in a balanced way, otherwise it is impossible to be included in compulsory education.

In recent two or three years, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council have issued a series of guiding opinions on the reform of basic education, including Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Education and Teaching, Improving the Quality of Compulsory Education in an All-round Way, Opinions on Strengthening and Improving School Aesthetic Education in the New Period, Opinions on Strengthening and Improving School Aesthetic Education, etc. Opinions on strengthening and improving aesthetic education in schools in the new period, and opinions on comprehensively strengthening labor education in universities, primary and secondary schools in the new period. "Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Education Evaluation in the New Era", "Opinions on Further Reducing the Students' Homework Burden and Off-campus Training Burden in Compulsory Education Stage" and so on. To carry out the comprehensive reform of basic education, we must implement these opinions, especially the General Plan for Deepening the Reform of Education Evaluation in the New Era, get rid of the "five-oriented" problems such as only achievement, only further studies and only academic qualifications, and form a new view of education and talents. This is the key to building a good basic education ecology.