Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Is education for society or individuals?
Is education for society or individuals?
Some people say that the purpose of education is to cultivate individuals to be useful to society. Others say that the purpose of education is to realize one's personal ambition. Discuss two viewpoints and give our own.

Explain the theme of IELTS writing

Writing ideas: (for reference only)

The first paragraph: retelling the background, introducing the topic, but not expounding the point of view;

The second paragraph: The purpose of education should be to cultivate useful talents for the society, because education is a means for the whole society to seek development.

The third paragraph: The purpose of education should be enough to cultivate useful talents for the society, because many educations are public and the educated should repay the society.

The fourth paragraph: Realizing personal ambition should also be the purpose of education. Because if education cannot make people happy in the end, then education must be a failure.

Conclusion: As long as people find common ground in their personal ideals and social needs, the purpose of education can be win-win, that is, serving the society while realizing their personal aspirations.

IELTS writing model essay

For decades, the purpose of education has been in conflict. Some people firmly believe that its purpose is to cultivate efficient and capable promoters for social progress, while others believe that realizing personal value should be its ultimate goal.

For decades, the role of education has been in conflict. Some people firmly believe that its goal is to create efficient and capable promoters for social progress, while others believe that achieving personal accomplishment should be its ultimate goal.

Personally, the utilitarian function of education is completely understandable, because providing a sustainable bright future for society is the common goal of mankind at all historical stages and social levels, and education, as such a key means, has long been resorted to. This is why schools and colleges are usually designed to train future bureaucrats or pioneers in specific fields. Even today, the content of textbooks is selected, and the curriculum and plan are basically determined according to the current social needs.

Personally, the utilitarian function of education is understandable, because promoting the sustainable development and bright future of society is the common goal of human beings at all historical stages and social levels, and education, as a key means, has always been like this. This is why schools and universities are usually designed to train future bureaucrats or pioneers in a certain field. Even now, the content of textbooks has been selected, and the curriculum and procedures are basically determined according to the current social needs.

In addition, we should not forget that it is public schools that provide many young people with the opportunity to receive free education, thus changing their fate; Therefore, it is completely reasonable for these beneficiaries to contribute to their communities and return afterwards.

In addition, we should not forget that it is public schools that provide many young people with the opportunity to get free education, thus changing their fate; Therefore, it is completely reasonable for these beneficiaries to dedicate their communities to their own communities and return them later.

However, it is undeniable that when a person studies a thing wholeheartedly, he or she will automatically devote himself or herself to it, actively try to overcome the difficulties on the way forward, and turn a hard process into a pleasant one, thus bringing a decent career, higher social status and, in short, happiness. However, if individuals have to learn what they should learn instead of what they sincerely desire, they may end up with a sad life course. Although education is beneficial to the development of society, education that ignores personal happiness is essentially a failure.

It is true, however, learning the core content of a thing will automatically include him or her, actively strive to overcome difficulties, turn the hard process into enjoyment, and also bring a decent career, higher social status, in short, happiness. However, if everyone wants to learn what they should do instead of what they really want, they may end up miserable. What is beneficial to social development is that education is the essence of failure, regardless of personal well-being.

To me, these two statements are not contradictory. Education can have dual functions, because a person may have several ambitions. As long as they choose those that are of great value to society as their lifelong pursuit and give up others, both individuals and society can prosper.

To me, these two views are not paradoxes at all. Education can have dual functions, because people may have several aspirations. As long as their lifelong pursuit is of great value to society, then individuals and society will make progress.