Chapter one: How to write the reply comments of mathematics correspondence undergraduate course? After reviewing the thesis, the defense team thinks that the topic of the thesis is of research value, and the author has certain ability to read reference materials, basically completes the contents stipulated in the graduation thesis task book, writes fluently, and answers questions correctly in defense. There are still some defects in this paper, such as unreasonable structure, too many introductions and discussions. After discussion by the defense team, the defense score is determined as.
After reviewing the paper, the defense team thinks that the paper has good ideas and research value. The author has a certain ability to read reference materials, basically completed the contents stipulated in the graduation thesis task book, wrote fluently, and answered correctly in the defense. There are still some shortcomings in this paper, such as unreasonable structure, too many introductions and discussions. After discussion by the defense team, the defense score is determined as.
After reviewing the paper, the defense team thinks that the topic of this paper has certain research value. The author has a certain ability to read reference materials, basically completed the contents stipulated in the graduation thesis task book, wrote fluently, and answered correctly in the defense. There are still some defects in this paper, such as unreasonable layout, too much introduction and discussion. After discussion by the defense team, the defense score is determined as.
After reviewing the thesis, the defense team thinks that the thesis is well conceived, the author has certain ability to read the reference materials, basically completes the contents stipulated in the graduation thesis task book, writes fluently, and can correctly answer the questions raised by the defense team when defending. There are still some shortcomings in this paper, such as improper language expression and unclear views. After discussion by the defense team, the defense score is determined as.
After reviewing the thesis, the defense team thinks that the thesis is well conceived, the author has certain ability to read the reference materials, basically completes the contents stipulated in the graduation thesis task book, writes fluently, and can correctly answer the questions raised by the defense team when defending. There are still some shortcomings in this paper, such as improper language expression and unclear views. After discussion by the defense team, the defense score is determined as.
The defense team believes that the student has a correct attitude, rigorous argumentation, standardized writing, high writing level, strong ability to analyze and solve problems with theory, calm response and smooth and accurate answers in the process of graduation thesis writing. Therefore, this student's graduation thesis has reached the requirements of the training objectives of this major, and it is recommended to award it. Bachelor degree.
The second part: how to write the defense comments of mathematics correspondence undergraduate course?
Tutor's comments: This topic has a novel angle, clear context, fluent writing and clear basic views. The main problems still exist in the article: students have not thoroughly digested the materials they have found, and the arguments are not strong enough.
Teacher's comments: First of all, the ingenious conception of the topic is worthy of recognition. It is also a subject with a relatively large research space. In the limited space, the paper can basically be described clearly. This topic belongs to the industry, with a lot of research level, first-hand information and literature accumulation. Pay attention to fully absorb the existing research results to support your own analysis and research. Clear explanation, clear argument, substantial argument, reasonable structure and fluent writing. The deficiency lies in the lack of new ideas, mostly summing up the achievements of modern research, but it is also valuable as an undergraduate.
Comments of the defense team: Good idea and great research value. However, this topic is huge in structure and content, and it also needs strong and mature independent research ability. So it is not difficult for undergraduates. If the author can learn more from the previous research results and strengthen the reading and analysis of the literature, it will help him straighten out the logic and think smoothly in the argument of the topic. It is necessary to be bold and confident in the presentation of the paper, and improve the refining ability of the on-the-spot language and the adaptability to the problem.
Chapter three: How to write the reply comments of mathematics correspondence undergraduate course and guide teachers' opinions.
According to the opinions of the defense team, the student can skillfully and concisely state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, and respond quickly, clearly and accurately when answering questions. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the papers as excellent according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.
The tutor has a good opinion.
The defense team suggested that the student should be able to explain the main contents of the paper fluently and clearly within the specified time, and answer the questions related to the paper appropriately. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the paper score as "good" according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.
The tutor's opinion is average.
The defense team believes that the student can describe the main content of the paper within the specified time and can answer the questions correctly in principle. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the paper score as medium according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.
Opinions and qualifications of instructors.
The defense team thinks that the student can state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, but the organization is not clear enough and the answers to some main questions are not appropriate enough, but he can make supplementary explanations after being prompted. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the paper score as passing according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.
Article 4: How to write students' defense comments in mathematics correspondence courses;
In the five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main points, content and structure of the paper, and the writing process of the paper. The organization is clear and the language is correct, but sometimes he has to read the lecture notes, so he is not fully prepared. The teacher's first question
Inspired by the teacher, the student gave a basically correct answer to this question. The students' answer to the teacher's second question is basically correct, but it is virtually revealed that it is not a clerical error to write a tragic belief as a tragic fate. For the third question, the students' answer is satisfactory, but there are some language errors. In terms of pronunciation and intonation, survival lies in several problems. Fluency is not the same as other students in a defense group. After careful discussion, the defense team still agreed to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked the student to correct some language errors left in the thesis.
Student 2
In the five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main points, content and structure of the paper, as well as the research conducted for this purpose. The statement is concise and to the point, which shows that you have a certain understanding of the problem under study. The student's answer to the teacher's first question is accurate; The student answered the question about the source of the data honestly, but in many places in the paper, she did not specify the source of the data, which is a major defect. The answer to the third question is obviously not relevant enough. You may not have heard the teacher's oral question clearly. The student is fluent in defense language, but there are some problems in pronunciation and intonation. After careful discussion, the defense team unanimously agreed to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked the student to correct some mistakes in the thesis.
Student three fluently stated the purpose, theoretical and practical significance of the thesis writing, expounded the main viewpoints and contents of the thesis, and introduced the writing process of the thesis. Clear logical thinking and fluent language. For the teacher's first question, the students only gave a basically correct answer under the teacher's inspiration. For the second question, the answer is concise and satisfactory. For the third question, the answer is not exact enough and there are obvious mistakes. After careful discussion, the defense team unanimously agreed (still agreed) to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked him to correct some remaining papers/make some modifications to the thesis.
Student four
The student well stated the purpose, theoretical and practical significance of the thesis writing, expounded the main viewpoints and contents of the thesis, and introduced the writing process of the thesis. The thinking is clear, but the understanding of the logical structure of this paper is not deep enough. The statement is concise and to the point, which shows that you have a certain understanding of the problem under study. However, reading the lecture notes many times in the elaboration seems to be insufficient preparation. The student's answer to the teacher's first question is accurate; The student answered the question about the source of the data truthfully, but in some units of the paper, he did not indicate the source of the data. The answer to the second question is obviously not relevant enough. I may not have heard the teacher's oral question clearly. For the third question, the students' answer is satisfactory, but there are several language mistakes. After careful discussion, the defense team unanimously agreed to pass the student's graduation thesis, but asked the student to correct some mistakes in the thesis.