0 1 neither the training course nor the teacher's make-up lessons can stop the existence of training and make-up lessons, which is a market-oriented relationship between supply and demand. The reason why there are training courses and teachers make up lessons is because there is market demand. If training institutions and teachers are forced to make up classes, they will only cut off the supply of goods and will not solve the demand problem.
In fact, according to the national policy, private education has been legalized on 20 17 and can be profitable. In other words, the state does not prohibit, but supports. Just to operate legally. In addition, according to the "Teachers Law", it has long been clear that in-service teachers are not allowed to make up lessons with compensation. These two years have been very strict. Every time our school holds a teacher's meeting, we must emphasize it. Therefore, at present, there are almost no in-service teachers making up lessons, but there may still be cases where individual teachers make up lessons at home.
Why does the state support private education and prohibit in-service teachers from making up lessons with compensation? With the development of China's economy, citizens' demand for education is increasing.
First, diversified needs include not only cultural knowledge, but also artistic expertise, intellectual thinking and other needs.
The second is elite demand, and parents want their children to be taller and stronger.
These needs are often difficult to meet only by public schools, so the state encourages private schools to enter the field of education. At present, private educational institutions are a supplement to public education. From the long-term development of the country, public and private enterprises will stand side by side. China's private education market still has a broad space.
Almost all public schools in China are funded by the state, which is of a public welfare nature to a large extent. The main purpose is to meet the needs of China citizens to receive basic education and treat all citizens equally. Therefore, the foothold of public education is fairness.
In-service teachers make up lessons, which breaks the fairness in the public system. At the national level, this is not allowed.
With the economic development of China, different families have higher and higher demand for personalized education. So, how to solve the contradiction between the fairness of public schools and the demand for family specialization?
Personally, I think the country should do it from two aspects: first, improve the education level of public schools; The second is to allow market capital to enter education.
From the above questions, we can see that public schools and private institutions will undertake different functions. Public schools mainly promote the improvement of the basic quality of the whole people, and at the same time transport talents for the development of the country. Private institutions serve family education and meet the educational needs of different families.
Because the problems of the current college entrance examination system have not been well solved, choosing a career through the college entrance examination results is still the pursuit or the only choice of most families in our country. Therefore, most private institutions are now undertaking the service of improving the results of the college entrance examination and making profits from it. This is the result of the simplified mechanism that only looks at the results in the current college entrance examination. This phenomenon will last for a long time.
With the further development of China's economy, the differentiated needs of different families for education will inevitably widen further. How to make education fair? The meaning of fairness here is how to ensure that the working people at the bottom enjoy high-quality educational resources instead of being monopolized by the middle and upper classes.
To solve this problem, we must first ask what is the root of the imbalance of educational resources in China?
The main reason is that China is short of money and the state has not invested enough in education. Why doesn't the state increase investment in education? Education is the foundation of national development. The country must also understand this, but the country has too little money and uses too many places.
China's GDP ranks second in the world. However, China has a large population, and its per capita GDP ranks 70th in the world, far behind the developed countries. Therefore, China is still a developing country.
The country is a whole, which affects the whole body. In order to balance educational resources, we need to work together in social employment, university education, primary and secondary education and other links. This will not happen overnight.
How to return the pure land to the Education Party? So, how to achieve educational equity? Is there a foreseeable direction? I think it's predictable.
First, improve the employment environment and narrow the treatment gap in different employment directions.
For example, the entertainment industry has profiteering treatment, which is unreasonable. For another example, the wage level in the financial industry is significantly higher than that in other industries. This requires national policies to standardize and improve. At present, it is difficult to change because China's national fiscal revenue still needs the support of these industries, while the development of other industries has not reached its due height. With the development of China's economy, this problem will be alleviated.
The second is to reform the direction of university education.
At this point, China is reforming in this direction, but the speed is too slow.
Our country is transforming the current university education from comprehensive to professional. Judging from the current trend of university reform in China, the future development direction can be as follows: a few first-class universities deepen their research-oriented direction and focus on developing various theoretical studies. Some universities turn to the social direction, mainly to train all kinds of social public talents for the operation of society. Finally, most colleges and vocational schools turn to specialization and technicalization to provide high-quality technical talents for all walks of life.
From this perspective, universities will inevitably have different developments in the future, and each university has its own advantageous majors. It is no longer monopolized by a few schools. For example, University A mainly trains scientific research talents, and students will mainly engage in scientific research in the future; University B may mainly train research-oriented talents in liberal arts; C university focuses on cultivating legal talents; D university focuses on cultivating automobile maintenance talents; E University focuses on cultivating talents such as baking cakes. Students from these different schools will work in all walks of life in the future, but there is little difference in salary levels. So as to study for interest, not for high salary.
The third is the reform of primary and secondary education.
After there is only a division of labor and no professional level in society, the educational model of primary and secondary schools will inevitably change. Subject knowledge is only the foundation, what is important is the comprehensive quality of students. Therefore, only the results of college enrollment will be taken as the basic basis, and a basic qualified line will be delineated. College enrollment will focus on students' comprehensive quality to choose majors. In this way, students will inevitably develop real quality education in primary and secondary schools.
Therefore, in school, students mainly cultivate the corresponding quality for their interest in learning. Personally, private institutions will mainly undertake the quality training of different students and tailor-made services for students. This is the direction of the private sector.
The college entrance examination is only a basic starting point. It only determines whether students can go to college. As for which university to go to, it depends on the quality of students, and quality determines the professional direction. For example, student A scored 650 points in the college entrance examination, so he is eligible to go to all universities in China, but which school to go to depends on his comprehensive quality, that is, his interest and preparation for this interest.
For example, he can go to Tsinghua to do research, as long as his interest is doing research; If he thinks doing research is too boring and boring, he can choose not to go to Tsinghua, but to study excavator maintenance in Lan Xiang. Because Lan Xiang's excavator repair major ranks first in the country and is as famous as Tsinghua. He can also choose to study clinical medicine at Tongji Medical University, because its clinical specialty ranks first in China. Of course, this is just a metaphor.
Personally, I think that when the country develops to this level, education will almost realize a pure land paradise. The current college entrance examination reform in China is moving in this direction.