Pushing the door to class is impolite and offensive. Therefore, it is very obvious that pushing the door to attend classes is unpopular. After all, there is obviously no "class", but there is a "sliding door". Generally speaking, the main purpose of attending classes is to master the teaching objectives, and the problems found are conducive to immediately tracking specific guidance or in-depth teaching activities. This foothold is correct and absolutely necessary. But sensational means that what was originally generous has become "sneaky" because of the "sliding door"? Suppose you are a school leader, holding a small stool in your hand and opening the classroom door for class. The teacher turned out to be an important exam, and he was caught off guard. How to listen to the exam? When you are embarrassed and hesitant, the school leader is already sitting. You can't drive the school leaders back. Nine times out of ten, you can change the classroom teaching plan and tell a performance class to please you.
Here comes the core of the problem. Don't say that colleges and universities often take the form of "pushing the door to attend classes". There is indeed a distrust mentality in the room, and there are deeper reasons.
It turns out that there is a disconnect between "normal class" and "demonstration class" in teachers' classroom teaching. An important function of "demonstration class" is to show and give samples of classroom teaching, which obviously contains the elements of performance and show, which are gaudy, beautiful and worthless, and everyone knows it tacitly.
What is really useful in classroom teaching is "normalized classroom", which does not pay attention to beauty and prosperity, but emphasizes implementation and effectiveness. However, the weakness of "normalized curriculum" is very obvious, that is, it is random, which is mainly manifested in laziness and impermanence in classroom teaching volume, relative density and high efficiency. Seriously, just like "The Old Sheep Pulled that Rotten Car", it is slow and slow, not to mention expressive force, and it depends entirely on hard work. Don't you know that Chinese class can't be made up after class?
Obviously, if schools want to improve the quality of teaching, they need to improve the economic benefits of "normalized classes" in education from the source. I have never heard of these things that rely on performances and show classes to ensure quality. However, as long as someone is in class, the teacher will subconsciously perform and show. After all, the teacher wants to leave a good reputation for the boss.
Therefore, the supervision and evaluation method of "pushing the door to attend classes" has changed from time to time, but it will not be warmly welcomed by teachers because of the influencing factors of indoor distrust. If you push the door to attend class, the teacher will still switch to the temporary "demonstration class" and deal with you like "pulling the power switch".
Some people may ask, even if "pushing the door to attend classes" is not good, do you have any effective methods? No: open the door for class. The difference between these two words lies in consciousness. Pushing the door to attend classes, the teacher passively accepts, like welcoming the "four noes and two straights" inspection, which is a response; Open the door to class, teachers take the initiative to open their own classroom teaching to the outside world, anyone can listen, we should humbly invite specific guidance and actively develop; Pushing the door to attend classes, I must listen; Open the door to class and invite me to listen. However, opening the classroom and opening the door of the classroom is not as simple as everyone said. Because the energy of conformism has always been strong, it takes courage to throw away the mask of hypocrisy. Colleges and universities should create an atmosphere of public opinion from top to bottom, increase publicity, release typicality, use the energy of administrative departments carefully, seek things from people, win the world with integrity, and firmly believe in seeds and years.