Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Which college entrance examination repeat school in Chongqing is better?
Which college entrance examination repeat school in Chongqing is better?
The better college entrance examination repeat schools in Chongqing are: candlelight college entrance examination repeat school, Chongqing Changshou Yucai culture tutorial school, Chongqing Zhuofu education and wheat field education.

1. Chongqing candlelight college entrance examination repeat school was formerly a cram school for college entrance examination in Chongqing No.1 Middle School. The school was founded on 1987. In 2003, it was officially renamed Chongqing Candlelight College Entrance Examination Re-reading School by the higher authorities. It has been running for 20 consecutive years and is the only full-time college entrance examination repeat school in Chongqing.

2. Zhuofu Education was established in 2008. It is an excellent after-school education counseling institution in primary and secondary schools, rooted in Chongqing and radiating southwest. Co-founded by the elite of education, and co-founded with Chongqing First-line Niutiantuan.

Adhering to the educational concept of "learning from others' strengths, learning from others' strengths", we creatively put forward a multi-dimensional integrated service system of teaching, learning and research, such as "3+ 1 teaching system", "zero-difference learning whole-course supervision system" and "exclusive EAP system", which can stimulate children's interest in learning, improve their learning efficiency, enhance their comprehensive quality and let them "learn from Excellence".

The method of choosing a repeat school

1, look at the real evaluation of previous classmates.

If a repeat class is really successful, it will inevitably leave written materials written by students admitted by key universities and other institutions such as Tsinghua and Peking University, and these materials dare to be published in newspapers, websites and a large number of publicity materials released to the public (not one or two or three or five people, but dozens or hundreds of people, with the original documents available).

Let's see what these students say about this repetition class. Because it is difficult for a large number of students to "sing praises" for a repetition class against their wishes. There is no real evaluation from a large number of students, which is not credible or has low credibility.

2. Look at the teaching qualification of the organizer.

The organizers of some repeat classes were originally teachers and principals with rich teaching experience and outstanding performance in key middle schools, and of course they have reliable qualifications. Because the repeat students are all students who graduated from high school or are studying in the third year of high school, if the organizers themselves have no experience and qualifications to teach the third year of high school, they are born with insufficient qualifications.

No matter what advanced educational theories or novel educational concepts are preached, no matter what new teaching methods and management methods are preached, it is difficult to make people believe that it is a scientific conclusion summed up from truly reasonable educational practice, and it is also difficult to ensure the high quality of this repeating course. So it is not credible or has low credibility.

3. Have standardized conditions for running a school.

This point focuses on whether there are standardized teaching places. Whether the teaching building is safe and standardized, whether there is an independent and quiet campus and activity venue, and whether the accommodation conditions of students in the school are sound and standardized are all issues that candidates and parents need to pay attention to.