According to many people's evaluation, it is not very reliable. The reliability of the evaluation lies in its high reliability and validity, that is, the accuracy of what everyone said is not high. It is understood that their evaluation boasted a lot. They won the titles of Global Professional Intelligence Data Analysis and Guidance Center, GCIDGC and Professor Li Yifei of Beijing Normal University, and were good at LGDI and bragging skills. It is understood that professional personality (four-dimensional personality) is actually changed by MBTI. As we all know, MBTI is a psychological type test, not a personality test at all, especially not suitable for high school students in plastic period. Other dimensions are also pieced together. Finally, professional orientation is also a single-dimensional recommendation, which is very one-sided, and ultimately leads to low accuracy. According to the analysis, in fact, their test scale is copied from foreign scales and changed at will. Without scientific sampling and data model, the results of repeated tests are inconsistent, with poor reliability and low reliability and validity. In addition, according to the students who have participated in the test, the test results are far from their actual situation. If you choose a major or volunteer to fill in the report according to the results, the consequences can be imagined, which is not only misleading to individuals. Moreover, it will affect the professional study in the university in the future, so we should polish our eyes and choose a professional evaluation system with high reliability and validity. Don't be misled by those rubbish comments, choose carefully. I hope I can help you and adopt it.