Check whether self-examination and self-correction are fully covered and whether ideological mobilization is extensive and in-depth.

The second is to check whether the organizational rectification measures are effective and whether new clues of violation of discipline and law are found.

Third, check whether the persistent ailments have been effectively rectified and whether the stock problem has been basically eliminated.

Fourth, check whether the clues of the case are in place and whether the effect of removing the black sheep is obvious.

Fifth, check whether "lenient self-examination and strict investigation" are in place.

Check, correct and correct the "five must talk";

First, the party secretary must talk to the secretary of the Political and Legal Committee and the main leaders of the political and legal units.

Second, members of the leading group must be able to speak.

Third, team members and middle-level cadres must talk.

Fourth, middle-level cadres and ordinary policemen must talk.

Five, team members take the initiative to explain the problem to the organization, has been dealt with, there are signs of problems, police officers in key positions must talk.

Legal basis: Provisions on leading cadres' intervention in judicial activities and handling records, notifications and accountability of specific cases Article 2 Leading cadres at all levels should take the lead in observing constitutional laws, safeguard judicial authority and support judicial organs in exercising their functions and powers independently and impartially according to law. No leading cadre may ask the judicial organ to handle a case in violation of statutory duties or legal procedures, and may not ask the judicial organ to do anything that hinders judicial justice.