After investigation, the weighted score of college entrance examination English subjects is a major liability accident caused by serious decision-making mistakes.
165438+1October 24th, after the results of English subjects in Zhejiang College Entrance Examination were announced, some students and parents questioned the test results and the weighted scoring method, which aroused widespread concern in society. The provincial party committee and government attached great importance to it, and Che Jun, secretary of the provincial party committee, held several meetings to conduct special research. 65438+February 1, the provincial party committee decided to set up a provincial government investigation team headed by Governor Yuan Jiajun, with Ren Zhenhe, member of the Standing Committee of the Provincial Party Committee, secretary of the Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission and acting director of the Provincial Supervision Commission, as deputy head, and relevant authoritative experts participating. On February 4, 65438, the provincial party Committee held a standing Committee to listen to the report of the investigation team and make a special study.
At the press conference, the reporter learned that after the English subject examination of the college entrance examination in June 5438+065438+ 10, the Provincial Department of Education and the Provincial Education Examinations Institute received some reflections from some candidates and parents on the difficulty of this examination, so some questions were weighted with reference to the difficulty of the same period last year.
The main person in charge of the provincial education department failed to perform his duties correctly, violated the principle of democratic centralism, and decided on major issues concerning the overall situation and stability without collective research. The responsible comrades of the Provincial Education Examinations Institute did not adhere to the principle and passed and implemented the wrong decision of weighted points in violation of regulations when most people in the president's office held different opinions.
The investigation team organized marking experts to strictly check the marking process and results of this English subject test paper, and considered that the marking organization of this English test was in line with the relevant provisions of the college entrance examination, the marking score was strict and fair, and the original scores of candidates were legal and valid.
The provincial government decided to cancel the weighted score of this exam and restore the original score.
The provincial party committee and government decided to hold relevant functional units and responsible persons accountable respectively.
Guo Huawei Provincial Department of Education was relieved of the post of Party Secretary and Member, and was ordered to resign as Director of the Provincial Department of Education.
Wang Yuqing, secretary of the Party Committee and member of the Education Examinations Institute, was removed from his post, and the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection filed a case review on his alleged violation of discipline.
Sun Heng, member of the Party Group of the Provincial Education Department, member of the Party Committee of the Provincial Education Examinations Institute and president, admonished and talked.
The Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection was stationed in the Discipline Inspection and Supervision Team of the Provincial Education Department, and Chen Yujun, member of the Party Committee of the Provincial Education Examinations Institute and secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission, filed a case review on the alleged violation of discipline.
Zhejiang Province announced 20 18 1 1 English subjects for college entrance examination.
Survey results of weighted scores
20 18 12.5
165438+1October 24th, after the results of English subjects in Zhejiang College Entrance Examination were announced, some students and parents questioned the test results and the weighted scoring method, which aroused widespread concern in society. The provincial party committee and government attached great importance to it, and Che Jun, secretary of the provincial party committee, held several meetings to conduct special research. 65438+February 1, the provincial party committee decided to set up a provincial government investigation team headed by Governor Yuan Jiajun, with Ren Zhenhe, member of the Standing Committee of the Provincial Party Committee, secretary of the Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission and acting director of the Provincial Supervision Commission, as deputy head, and relevant authoritative experts participating. On February 4, 65438, the provincial party Committee held a standing Committee to listen to the report of the investigation team and make a special study. After investigation, the weighted score of college entrance examination English subjects is a major liability accident caused by serious decision-making mistakes.
After the English subject test of the College Entrance Examination in June 5438+065438+ 10, the Provincial Department of Education and the Provincial Education Examinations Institute received feedback from some candidates and parents on the difficulty of this test, so some questions were weighted according to the difficulty of the test questions in the same period last year.
The investigation team believes that the weighted decision-making basis of college entrance examination English subjects is insufficient and the decision-making is seriously wrong, which leads to unfair and unreasonable results. "Zhejiang province to deepen the comprehensive reform of college entrance examination system" stipulates that "Chinese, mathematics, foreign languages each subject 150 points, scores included in the total score of candidates". The weighted score after the exam changed the "score" of the exam and did not meet the requirements of the above documents. According to the relevant regulations of the education department, the grading rules should be formulated before the formal marking. This kind of weighted marking is carried out after the formal marking is completed, and it does not belong to the category of scoring rules. The main leaders of the Provincial Department of Education and the Provincial Education Examinations Institute confused the concepts of weighted marking and scoring rules. In the specific operation, the Provincial Education Examinations Institute did not conduct sufficient technical demonstration, but only simulated deduction, which led to differences in the weighted scores of different candidates on the same topic.
The decision-making procedure is not standardized. According to the "Regulations on Major Administrative Decision-making Procedures in Zhejiang Province", major administrative decisions should be fully demonstrated, carefully studied and made collectively according to procedures. However, the main person in charge of the provincial education department failed to perform his duties correctly, violated the principle of democratic centralism, and decided on major issues related to the overall situation and stability without collective research. The responsible comrades of the Provincial Education Examinations Institute did not adhere to the principle and passed and implemented the wrong decision of weighted points in violation of regulations when most people in the president's office held different opinions.
At the same time, the investigation team organized marking experts to strictly check the marking process and results of this English test paper, and believed that the marking organization of this English test was in line with the relevant provisions of the college entrance examination, the marking score was strict and fair, and the original scores of candidates were legal and valid.
According to the principle of seeking truth from facts, correcting mistakes, and correcting mistakes, the provincial government decided to cancel the weighted score of this exam and restore the original score.
After listening to the report of the investigation team and making a special study, the provincial party committee and government decided to investigate the responsibilities of relevant functional units and relevant responsible persons respectively according to the People's Republic of China (PRC) Accountability Ordinance, the People's Republic of China (PRC) Supervision Law and the Interim Provisions on the Resignation of Party and Government Leading Cadres.
In the process of weighting English subjects in the college entrance examination, the Provincial Department of Education failed to perform its duties and decision-making procedures on major issues, resulting in serious mistakes and serious social consequences, and assumed leadership responsibilities. The Party Committee of the Provincial Department of Education was ordered to make an in-depth inspection to the provincial party committee, and the Provincial Department of Education made an in-depth inspection to the provincial government and seriously rectified it. The Party Committee of the Provincial Department of Education held a special democratic life meeting to seriously carry out criticism and self-criticism; Ordered the Provincial Department of Education to issue rectification measures to the society and formally apologize; Inform the Provincial Department of Education of its poor performance of its duties.
The Provincial Education Examinations Institute blindly implemented the wrong opinions of superior leaders, causing serious social consequences and taking direct responsibility. Ordered the Provincial Education Examinations Institute to make an in-depth inspection to the Provincial Department of Education; Inform the Provincial Education Examinations Institute that it has failed to perform its duties. The Party Committee of the Provincial Education Examinations Institute held a special democratic life meeting to seriously carry out criticism and self-criticism.
The responsibilities of relevant responsible persons shall be investigated as follows:
Guo Huawei Provincial Department of Education was relieved of the post of Party Secretary and Member, and was ordered to resign as Director of the Provincial Department of Education.
Wang Yuqing, secretary of the Party Committee and member of the Education Examinations Institute, was removed from his post, and the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection filed a case review on his alleged violation of discipline.
Sun Heng, member of the Party Group of the Provincial Education Department, member of the Party Committee of the Provincial Education Examinations Institute and president, admonished and talked.
The Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection was stationed in the Discipline Inspection and Supervision Team of the Provincial Education Department, and Chen Yujun, member of the Party Committee of the Provincial Education Examinations Institute and secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission, filed a case review on the alleged violation of discipline.
Other relevant responsible persons shall be dealt with by the relevant departments in accordance with the cadre management authority.