Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Does the division of "key" and "non-key" in schools hinder educational equity?
Does the division of "key" and "non-key" in schools hinder educational equity?
Nowadays, many schools, whether middle schools or primary schools, always have a title. Such as secondary schools attached to universities, primary schools attached to universities, experimental schools and yucai schools. And these schools with titles will basically be described as municipal or provincial key primary and secondary schools.

From the perspective of education, every child's hand education opportunity should be fair, so why should there be so many key and non-key schools? Is it to select top students? Or to enhance the reputation of the school? If both, the top students and the reputation of the school are occupied by this school, then many parents will be willing to let their children go to key primary and secondary schools. Then those schools that are neither affiliated with a university nor have any advantages will be gone?

On the one hand, people are eager for it, on the other hand, people are left out in the cold, resulting in such a great extreme that the resources for receiving a good education are becoming scarcer and scarcer. Too many people want to enter the so-called key schools, and they will not hesitate to break their heads, as long as they can get in, whether by high scores or by smashing relationships.

Emphasis and lack of emphasis make the gap between different schools more and more obvious. From the teaching environment to the teaching staff, to the quality of students and to the passing rate of exams, key schools have really done something extraordinary, and the students who have gone out have a good reputation. However, we say that education must be treated equally, and we can't just pay attention to it without paying attention to it. This is really unfair to many children.