Although children's education is very important, if we can educate our children well, our society will be more innovative and develop better in the future, but if we rashly extend the nine-year education to 12 compulsory education, the three-year compulsory education will increase our huge economic expenditure, which is incalculable, so I think it will not be popularized basically. For many children, it is not necessary to go to school for so many years.
Although we now have nine-year compulsory education, in my rural hometown, many children dropped out of primary school, because for them, although schooling is free, they are not interested in learning. Parents want them to go out to work, which can reduce their parents' financial burden, so for many children, they don't need to go to school for so many years. If it is extended to 12, these children don't need it at all. The current nine-year compulsory education is completely sufficient.
I think our 9-year compulsory education is very good, because once children have completed 9-year compulsory education, the knowledge they have mastered is completely sufficient in society. If children want to develop in a certain aspect for a long time, they can have other education, and they can constantly master their own abilities and improve their technical level. Therefore, I think the current nine-year compulsory education is enough, and there is no need to continue to extend it.
To sum up, although the representative suggested extending the nine-year compulsory education to 12, I think it is difficult to popularize it in order to let children receive better education, because on the one hand, this proposal will increase huge economic expenditure, and the amount of money is difficult to measure, and for children, many children do not need to go to school for so many years. After completing the nine-year compulsory education, they have mastered the knowledge needed by society. If they are somewhere,