The student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, and can comprehensively collect information about the personal finance business of Industrial Bank. In the process of writing, I can comprehensively apply what I have learned, comprehensively analyze personal financial problems, and have a strong ability to comprehensively apply knowledge.
Zhang's length is completely in accordance with the regulations of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points and clear logical relationship, but he lacks personal opinions. The topic is consistent, the argument is prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Can get rich in literature.
The paper guides the teacher how to write comments, and the comments are excellent (90 points are still good). Cite examples in paper comments.
The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the collected literature is also more detailed. Comprehensive cloud uses Xue's knowledge to solve problems, and the Shu notes are reasonable, correct and innovative. In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the text is standardized, the organization is clear and the language is fluent.
The literature research of Gai paper is comprehensive and systematic, the guiding ideology of topic selection is clear, the experimental design is reasonable and feasible, and it can be carried out according to the experimental plan to achieve the expected effect.
Good (80-89 points) refer to the examples of paper comments.
The thesis of this paper has some independent opinions on "De", which proves that "De" is full of "points" and has a wide range of materials, and the theory of "Dan" is not supported by "examples". English Yu expresses Ji fluently, with fewer grammatical errors, and the paper format meets the requirements of the specification.
This paper has a novel topic and a unique perspective, which embodies the solid foundation of human resource management theory. In particular, the article can demonstrate and analyze the topic in combination with relevant cases, which has certain practical value. Through the review of the paper, we can see that the author spent a lot of time on the collection of materials and cases, and also put forward some profound views, but there are still some shortcomings in the depth of theory and the citation of some relevant data. Generally speaking, this paper is suitable for Ge.
Reference examples of Chinese (70-79 marks) paper reviews.
The topic of the paper is appropriate and the viewpoint is correct, but it lacks original opinions and sufficient argumentation content, and lacks the depth of Zheng Fa theory. English is fluent, but there are some grammatical mistakes. The paper format meets the requirements of Gui specification.
Pass (60-69 points) refer to the examples of Pinghua in the paper.
The topic of Thesis lacks originality, insufficient argumentation, few concrete examples, too many cliches and too many quotations from other people's views. English expresses the original meaning of Ji, but there are many grammatical errors. The format of the paper basically meets the requirements.
Papers that failed (below 60 points) were Ping.
How to write a summary of the paper? Mei has different professional languages, and Ye should combine the specific characteristics of Zheng's article.
Comments on the first draft:
The title of the article is basically the same as the content of the paper, the structure is basically complete, the language is relatively smooth, and there are no big mistakes in the law. The problem is that there are too many full-text quotations and too few analyses, and some of your "analyses" have traces of copying Xi. It should be said that the materials needed to complete this paper are already shellfish, and the author can analyze and summarize the materials on this basis and get his own explanation.
Comments on the second draft:
On the basis of the first draft, some improvements have been made, some unnecessary paragraphs have been merged, the labels of some chapters in Wen have been redrafted, some sick sentences have been revised, and mistakes in Zhong have been corrected.
The new revisions include: the first abstract sentence of De, the change of key words, the influence of Dui on Jack London's life, and the "Superman" embodied in his work The Call of the Wild should also be explained by Yi. Some confusion in tense usage needs to be corrected. There are too many quotations and too few comments, and some references are not mentioned at all in the article, which is a difficult problem to solve. It is pointed out that London is a so-called superman, and Pearl Buck is also a superman, thus explaining the relationship between them and the influence of the author's life on his works.
Final review
The title of the paper is basically Xiang with Paper Content, which is complete in structure and fluent in language. In the first draft, in addition to the "Guo" in the "fen" paragraph, Mei also made some serious grammatical or spelling mistakes in the "Fa". The author tries to find a connection between the author and a character in Jack London's life. From the perspective of Neirong, the author has a deeper understanding of the original work and collected relevant materials, but only limited to the list of materials. How to draw my own conclusion by analyzing the materials is that the writing of the paper should achieve the goal of morality, and it is precisely at this point that the author's efforts are not enough.
[Example 2]
Comments on the first draft:
The content involved in this paper has certain guiding significance for solving the internal cultural conflicts of multinational companies. The Lun description is clear enough. In the contrast between eastern and western cultures, the author gives many interesting examples, but there are few examples in China. The examples of oriental culture are mostly taken from Japanese culture, which is a big deficiency. The article is too detailed, which is another shortcoming of Ge. It is almost a natural paragraph, which is even more confusing if you don't read it carefully. There are many mistakes in printing format, spelling and wording, especially in the second half of the paper. The positions of some reference publishing houses in Xi 'an are still lacking.
Comments on the second draft:
It has been greatly improved on the basis of the first draft. The main problem has been solved. In particular, the "sub-layer" in the draft of Stone is too thin, and there are some shortcomings such as the lack of examples of China culture. Wu has corrected many language mistakes, but there are still some mistakes pointed out last time. The process and reason are not equal. There are still some minor problems in the arrangement of references. The introduction still doesn't indicate the source.
Final opinion:
The structure of the paper is complete, and each part basically conforms to the English paper writing norms. This paper attempts to analyze the cross-cultural conflict of multinational company Gong from the perspective of cultural comparison between China and the West, and seek solutions. In order to write this paper well, the author obviously consulted a lot of information, which was fully discussed and clearly organized. Unfortunately, because the author herself has no working experience in Kua Company and has never been to a multinational company like Zuo, her exposition can only be based on the second-hand information Liao got from reading, and the so-called oriental culture is mostly represented by Japanese materials. To solve the German cultural conflict of multinational companies in China, readers need more cultural contrast between China and the West. Although the author added some in the later draft, it was still not enough.
[Example 3]
Comments on the first draft:
The title of the paper is very good and creative. The author studied Maslow's psychological Lie theory and Jack London's original works. The main face of Ti is: 1: I don't know much about the format of English papers. In the introduction, you are a chart and a section. There is no conclusion behind the virtue of literature, and the arrangement of virtue in the literature is not standardized. 2. The mistake of Fang's view is that he is afraid that the theory of human mind can also be applied to animals. In fact, the dog in Jack London's works is anthropomorphic to some extent, and it is a body fairy.
Shandong University Graduation Thesis Review Template Jinan Summer Fever, especially Zhao Wuji. Being angry with Hou is really not very good. Shandong people are honest and frank.
A Ji mechanical major in Shanda, not bad. Your campus is in Xinglong Mountain Campus, not in the suburbs, and there are several girls. ...
Sophomore students can change their major, but they have to pass the examination and selection. If you do well in your freshman year, just interview directly.
Alexander
Label: Composition Classics Previous: OK, just type an idiom with words. What should I do to type an idiom? Next: poems in the desert, lonely poems in the desert.
The evaluation and recommendation of this paper are accurate in terms of terminology, punctuation and citation format, which conforms to academic norms. The whole article takes "Zhu Ti" as the center, with a clear point of view, which is a breakthrough compared with the existing academic achievements in related academic fields. This is because it dares to break through the previous viewpoints and the viewpoints in the Record of Body Art on the issue of "a certain", and it has something to say and can justify itself, which has played a positive role in enriching the connotation of this academic field and contending academic viewpoints.
At the same time, this paper puts forward the innovation of Guan, while maintaining a high level of writing. The full-text language is accurate, the argument is clear and rigorous, and the argument is more detailed and sufficient, which can better explain and support its views and opinions.
To sum up, this paper shows the author's research ability and textual research ability from content to form, which is flat.
How to write the evaluation of the paper? Mainly from the perspective of writing to evaluate Du's whole thesis. The evaluation points are as follows:
1. Whether the viewpoint is correct and clear;
2. Whether the argument is sufficient;
3. Whether the analysis is comprehensive;
4. The stone Buddha has a reasonable structure;
5. Whether the statement is fluent;
6. Whether it has practical guiding significance.
The following is a De comment on the article "Reflections on Stopping the Phenomenon of Arbitrary Charges in Primary and Secondary Schools":
This paper can integrate theory with practice, make a comprehensive and profound analysis of the current unreasonable charging phenomenon in primary and secondary schools and its causes, and put forward measures to stop it, which has certain reference function and value for practical work. The thesis is clear in argument, reasonable in structure and clear in organization, and the argument is better than the impact.
How to write a comment on the topic of a thesis 1? The center is prominent, the arguments are sufficient and the structure is rigorous.
Graduation thesis (design) supervisor's comment: The research on Liao's accounting information distortion in this paper has strong practical value for dealing with accounting letter distortion and provides a basis for Xin. The author has clear thinking, sincere description process and reasonable analysis, and the results are highly applicable to rocks. The writing style of the thesis is Gui, and the sentences are fluent, which meets all kinds of requirements of academic proofreading of dissertations. Comments: The topic of the paper is basically the same as the content of the text Neijing, with complete structure and fluent language. Even in the first draft, there are not many serious redundant methods or spelling mistakes, except that the paragraphs are too thin. Shi Tu, the author, looks for a connection between characters in Tolstoy's and Cao Yu's novels. From the perspective of integration, the author has a deeper understanding of Yuan's works, and also got relevant information from Ji. Ruhetong analyzed these materials and got Chu's own solution, which is exactly what the author has done in this regard. Comments: The structure of the paper is complete, and all parts basically conform to the English writing standards. The title of the paper is very good and creative. In order to write this paper well, the author has done some research, especially Steinbeck's original work. It is not difficult to see from the author's reference to the original work that the author is quite familiar with the content of the original work. The language is also very sharp, the article is clear, well-founded, and the viewpoint is unique, which has certain De reference value and can be regarded as a good article. Comments: The topic of the article is meaningful. On the basis of Xi's academic research achievements, he has his own experience and put forward his own views, which is very reasonable. The argument is correct, the material is substantial, the narrative is clear and logical. Fluent in speech and Liu Chang. Writing conforms to academic norms. In the future, we should further sum up experience and compare the music education mode of Venus, so as to make music teaching easier. The paper can be drafted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of this paper. Comments: The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the literature is collected in detail, and the knowledge learned is comprehensively used to solve problems. The data obtained are reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions. In addition, the paper has correct format, Gui style, clear organization and fluent language. In the future, Jin should sum up experience and compare moral education models to make it easier.
Wonderful comments of graduation thesis supervisor:
The Ti selected in this paper meets the Mu professional training standard and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. Your topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has high academic research (testable) value (great practical guiding significance).
This Cha student has a strong ability to read literature, collect information about Kao examination system comprehensively, comprehensively apply Kao system knowledge in the writing process, comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and have a strong ability to comprehensively apply knowledge.
The length of the article fully conforms to the provisions of Academy, with complete content, scientific structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and some personal opinions.
The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme.
Language expression stream Chang, whose format Quan meets the specification requirements; Referring to Feng Fu's literature, it has a strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.
Good:
The topic of the thesis conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. Choosing Ti is valuable for academic research (reference).
Students have a strong ability to consult documents and can collect information about the examination system more comprehensively. In the process of writing, he can comprehensively use the knowledge of the examination system, comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and has a strong determination to comprehensively use knowledge.
The length of the article fully meets the requirements of the college, the content is relatively complete, the hierarchical structure is scientific, the main points are prominent, and the logical relationship is clear, but it lacks personal opinions.
The topic is consistent, the argument is prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme.
The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; No plagiarism was found.
Medium:
The topic of this paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is average. The problem of propaganda has the research (reference) value (practical guiding significance) of Xue Shu.
The student's ability to consult documents and materials is average, and he can collect information from the examination system. In the process of writing, Ben can comprehensively apply the knowledge of the examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and his comprehensive application ability is average.
The length of the article fully meets the requirements of the college, the content is basically complete, the hierarchical structure is general, and the main points are focused on certain logic, but there is a lack of personal opinions.
The topics are basically the same, and the arguments are more prominent. Discussion can better serve the argument.
The language expression is general, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Refers to some materials contributed by the article, and the timeliness is general; Item, no obvious plagiarism was found.
By:
The topic of this paper is in line with the professional training goal of Yang, and can basically achieve the comprehensive training goal, with less difficulty and less workload. The theme of the paper is general.
Students' ability to consult documents is poor, and they can't collect information about the examination system comprehensively. When compiling "Guo Tutorial", the ability to comprehensively use the knowledge of examination system and analyze the problems existing in the examination system is poor.
The length of the article conforms to Xue's rules, the content is incomplete, and the hierarchical structure arrangement is problematic. Canon's main points are not prominent enough, the logic is poor, and there is no personal opinion.
The topic is biased and the argument is not prominent enough.
How to write the comments of graduation thesis?