The worst school choice suggestion is to choose a school with 2 1 1. If you have the ability, you'd better enroll in some good schools on the premise that you have enough historical knowledge and enough reading, but depending on your own situation, there is no need for ordinary schools to enroll.
Trivial said some of their own experience, for your reference only.
2. How to prepare for the interdisciplinary examination of history graduate students First of all, why do you want to take the history exam? Business administration in any direction is better than employment in history. I majored in business administration, and now I happen to be a graduate student in history. If you are admitted to a graduate student in history, no matter which major, you will ask yourself this question many times: Why do you want to take a cross-disciplinary history exam?
Secondly, if you choose a better major in school history, the competition for the second interview must be fierce. Even if history is unpopular, as long as this major is strong in the school, the competition is fierce.
Then, think about it, you must take the history exam. Therefore, in terms of world history, the medieval history of Beijing Normal University, Shi Tian University and Northeast Normal University is very strong, the British history of Nantah and the American history of Jida. Modern work in China is relatively better now, because modern courses are offered in universities, just like advanced mathematics. Historical geography is the first to promote Shaanxi Normal University. Archaeology is generally not interdisciplinary. Unless you study chemistry. No matter which major, Peking University and the National People's Congress are almost the best choice for history examination.
Also, not only should we choose schools, but more importantly, we should choose tutors. If your tutor is a great person, that is quite advantageous. Besides, it is more difficult to test.
As for the preparatory work, besides English and politics, historical synthesis should at least look at the general history of China and the general history of the world.
3. It's very difficult for graduate students majoring in history to take an interdisciplinary exam. No matter what they take, it will definitely be very difficult. But if you are willing, if you are willing to work hard 1 year, you will survive.
There are several public courses (nothing more than Chinese, politics and foreign languages) in the postgraduate course, which is not much different from the undergraduate course, and then the professional courses.
There should be quite a few people taking the postgraduate entrance examination. According to statistics, institutions like them are said to have even reached the elimination rate of 70 1, but the approximate elimination rate should be 20/30. I just looked at other people's statistics. But this ratio should be those hot and popular majors. For history, although there are many people taking the exam, the admission rate should be relatively loose. The proportion should be moderate, almost every year.
Are there many people taking the exam? This is a very realistic problem. The answer is: of course there are many. There are so many people in China.
Is it difficult? I'll give you a reference.
It is said that graduate students from good institutions like them often have great competition, but there is a phenomenon that graduate students from less good institutions are often dissatisfied and much worse.
This figure should be accurate. From this point of view, you can clearly analyze the psychology of people who take the postgraduate entrance examination. Most of them definitely want to, or don't take the exam, or do well in the exam. Right? So no matter what major, as long as the school is good, then the competition is definitely great.
So this leads to a conclusion. In fact, if the postgraduate entrance examination is difficult, I think it should not be based on papers, but on institutions. No matter what major a good college is, there should be no distinction between hot and cold, because a good school, no matter what major it takes, will run to this school. For example, Tsinghua and Peking University, regardless of their major, are all candidates in a million.
Therefore, the postgraduate entrance examination and the college entrance examination are not the same. Choosing a university is the second best, so make do with it. However, most people who take the postgraduate entrance examination are often selected, and it is estimated that they will not be admitted. Because everyone thinks so, some people say that there is great competition. In fact, this relative problem is not an absolute problem.
Now that you have said it, you should not consider employment.
oh
I think you need to consider a compromise. You don't have to choose a good school to take the exam. Is that almost enough? Isn't it necessary to rely on individuals to guide the master to practice? I don't think you should go to college in a city like Beijing and Shanghai, since you have passed the cross-major exam. Otherwise it will be very hard. Think about it. You only study for one year. If someone has studied in this major for four years, he will learn a quarter of what you have learned in one day, and he will be more solid. So we can't compete. Because the starting line is different.
Since it is interest, there is only one purpose, that is, to learn what you are interested in. It is estimated that every university can learn, and the difference is not in the school, but in itself. That is, do you want to learn?
In fact, you can choose some places that are not the best, but they are also good places to consider, so that it will be much easier for you to get into graduate school. For example, you originally wanted to choose a city like Beijing or Shanghai, so now you may consider choosing a university in Suzhou or Hangzhou. Both places are books, but the places are different, just like I thought. Studying in Suzhou can not only learn knowledge, but also enrich your knowledge of ancient gardens. After studying in Hangzhou, can you learn more about the customs of the water towns in the south of the Yangtze River? Even if you are a writer in the future, you have to go on a field trip to write.
Even if you study history, you can choose Xi 'an, which is a famous ancient city in history and much older than Beijing. Naturally, the folk customs of Xi are also very helpful for you to understand history.
In this way, the difficulty of the exam will be reduced, and you will not be afraid of failing the exam. When I am a graduate student, I can occasionally enjoy the local natural scenery and folk customs.
Thinking about it is also a kind of enjoyment. Well, I like history, too, but I didn't consider the cross-disciplinary exam, because I think being interested is sometimes more interesting, and I can get new ideas that historians can't get.
In fact, it has little to do with learning the research history of the graduate school system. You can also take an examination of graduate students in this major, and then teach yourself history during your study.
Then I can be more free and not bound by textbooks. For example, as long as I don't watch professional courses, I will pick up the history of 24 and read it, which is very interesting. If I am really a graduate student in history, I may not feel what you want in class.
Anyway, we all have ready-made textbooks on China history (official history, so complete), right? Which textbook in college is not written according to official history? I don't think it makes any sense.
Because history in textbooks is relatively free, historians have established their views for you, and you just need to recite them.
4. The interdisciplinary examination of history for graduate students in the Department of History is a national unified examination, which is fair to the national candidates. However, both the National People's Congress and Xiamen University are independent schools, and their scores are definitely higher than the national line. As for which school is good, I'm not sure, but I feel that as long as three schools are not too bad, there should be no problem.
Actually, history is quite easy to test. You just need to memorize more in the professional class. If your English is not bad, there is no problem. For the cross-disciplinary history exam, it will definitely bring surprises to your major. It is estimated that you will only read the history foundation counseling book to cope with the exam. However, if you have the energy, I suggest you read some books written by everyone in history, such as Outline of National History by Qian Mu, Political Gains and Losses of China in Past Dynasties (a very thin booklet, but a detailed introduction to the political systems of major dynasties is thought-provoking), and Lv Simian's. Reading these books will also be of great help to the second interview.
I hope I can help you.
5. Do you think it is difficult to take the postgraduate entrance examination in history department? It's actually harder. I have been there before.
I studied science and geography in college for four years, and I had an idea when I watched my classmates busy taking the postgraduate entrance examination last semester. But I'm fun. I really don't have the perseverance to learn math, so I chose history. It's simple. I like history in middle school. Although I studied science, I have a certain foundation. In addition, my major that didn't take the math exam is boring and I can't stand it. The history major only needs to get 300 points on a historical basis.
However, the knowledge of history is too scattered. I bought 1 1 textbooks (1 1 recommended by the Postgraduate Entrance Examination Forum) and three tutorial books. Even so, I still wanted to give up before the exam, but at the thought of paying the registration fee, I insisted on taking the exam and the results came out. I only got 655 in the basic history exam. I admit that I chose history to save face, and I think it is easy to get a famous brand in the history exam. Now it seems that I am stupid, and it is difficult for graduate students from prestigious schools to find jobs. In fact, learning history well is useless. It's good to know about it, there is no need to study it in depth.
If you want to take the exam, you should study hard now and often go to some forums to read books. It is useful to sum up some knowledge points from time to time. Compared with other majors, you need to prepare less things, such as politics, English and history. It is recommended to read counseling books, because the above summary is very good, and you only have half a year, so it is too late to read textbooks. Reading textbooks can easily cause you to look past and not know what you have read, and get distracted.
6. What is the employment situation of doctors in history? What is the employment situation of doctors in history? Excerpted from the network, the enrollment of academic graduate students in China is decreasing. The reason is obvious. We don't want such an academic doctor, but the demand is limited! The word "martyr" is not very good. I'm going to be a teacher at Dangdang University. I'm going to take a cross-disciplinary examination for a doctorate in history, specifically historical geography. Yesterday, I called my former tutor and he said that the employment situation is also very severe now, and history is a cold major. Even if you graduate from a doctor's degree, it is not necessarily easy to find a job, or even the job is very poor ... most liberal arts majors are not easy to find employment. The key is to see someone. If you specialize in academics, you will engage in academics in a down-to-earth manner.
Otherwise, we should try our best to pay attention to social needs and supplement our abilities in all aspects. I have graduated with a master's degree, and my college is 2 1 1985. My major is a national key discipline. Now that I've found a good job, I've given up on people who knew me through reading my PhD, including my tutor, and told me to stop studying and go to work, otherwise it would be even harder to find it after reading.
Now, when a master or doctor is looking for a job, what employers value is: whether it is related, whether it is a boy, whether it has work experience, and whether it is a party member/student cadre. Have female masters and doctors ever been married?
Special places such as Beijing and Shanghai have other conditions such as local hukou, which employers rarely manage. There is really no way to measure ability with fixed standards.
If 10 papers are called scientific research ability, then 9 papers don't count. Many excellent doctors and masters I know have not found jobs, or the treatment is not good, the nature and place of work. Can you say that none of them have quot ability? Maybe it's no use saying more now. After graduating from a master's degree and looking for a job, you will know how much quot ability quot carries. What I want to say is: 1 Don't think that a doctor must be easier to find a job than an undergraduate, especially a liberal arts student.
If you can find a good job after graduating from college, you can take the postgraduate entrance examination and get a doctorate through on-the-job training, preferably not full-time. Don't think that even if the doctor throws a lot of money at him, he will definitely find a job.
Many people who study for the sake of study and study for the sake of study are rejected by universities and research institutes when they look for jobs after graduation, and they can no longer find a place to study. Arts students, in particular, are divorced from social reality and cannot be directly transformed into productive forces, so it is difficult to combine what they have learned all their lives with social needs-it is not their fault.
It is a panacea for undergraduates to find jobs, and they can go anywhere! However, the vast majority of employment quality is too low, holding a meager salary to temporarily work for others, and selling their youth is over! After graduating from graduate school, many people work in companies such as Huawei. It looks beautiful and the salary is relatively high, but this industry is a youthful meal and exhausting, such as a concentration camp! The gold content of wages is very low, and the enterprise is still unstable! Doctors mainly enter state organs, institutions, universities and research institutes, and their social status is very high! The salary doesn't look very high, but the gold content is high and stable, the work is not so tiring, and the benefits are better, so you can work until you are old. One must consider one's own economic strength when studying for a PhD. Unless you are really strong, there will be a good place in three years.
If you don't consider your own strength, at least you don't need to earn money to make a living at home. It's really boring to spend a lot of time and money blindly studying for a doctorate just to save face. It is a big mistake for those working or non-graduates to work hard for a diploma and want to make a lot of money in the future.
Anyone who goes to graduate school in history with such a mentality will suffer a great sin in the future. It is difficult to study history.
You can endure hardship and enjoy it. If not, think twice! ! For example, historically, in an ideal environment, a person's academic quality should be directly proportional to his quality of life, at least not too far away, that is, there should be necessary mechanisms to "support" these people (including professional scholars who are studying and future researchers). After all, without economic independence, there is no personality independence; Without personality independence, there will be no academic independence.
However, in the current environment, this ideal state of life is hard to obtain. Especially now, colleges and universities pay attention to the unification of learning, the origin and the three generations (mainly the oversupply). If the undergraduate and graduate schools are not 2 1 1 or 985, then the future employment will be restricted.
Students from poor families, even if admitted to 985 colleges and universities in the future, will find it difficult to enter famous domestic universities (key comprehensive universities and normal universities) in the future unless the relationship is relatively hard. However, if they can't enter a prestigious school to teach and do research, and can't get higher and greater resources to support them, their future academic road will be very difficult.
Theoretical and academic graduate students are now at the lowest point of employment. Only when the number of undergraduate and graduate students in history is greatly reduced in three or four years, or when enrollment is stopped, can we solve the employment situation of students majoring in history who have graduated but can't find their counterparts, are still studying and are about to graduate.
If you want to take the postgraduate examination in literature, history and philosophy, you must see the current employment situation clearly. Three years without reading. When you graduate, it will be difficult to change careers when you are old. If most graduate students majoring in history need to change careers now, why didn't you change careers when you were an undergraduate? It is not unreasonable that the Ministry of Education plans to increase the enrollment ratio of professional masters (practical and technical masters) to more than 50 by 20 15. For those students who want to take the history postgraduate exam, I (from a history class and graduated from this year) have taken the history teacher recruitment exam seven times, but I didn't get in.
Two games in Kunming, five games in central and eastern Shandong) I suggest you be cautious. Studying for a master's and doctor's degree in history is a luxury, suitable for people who have no worries about life and are suitable for people who are on the job.
Recently, people with great pressure in life, graduate students and doctors are getting narrower and narrower, and it is difficult to get their majors right and change careers. Your judgment is still too optimistic. Less than one-third of history graduate students have been employed in middle schools in Shandong, and perhaps one-fifth have.
Many departments and industries you mentioned don't need history at all. Libraries have library science and archival science, museums have museum science, and Shi Zhiban needs to take an examination of civil servants. Generally, it is required to apply for literature and history, and other majors in liberal arts can also apply. I have already taken the exam. Newspapers need themselves more.