First of all, the orientation of the title system in primary and secondary schools deviates from the original intention of education, and everything is money-oriented.

Because the titles of primary and secondary school teachers are linked to their salaries, everyone is thinking about evaluating their titles. In order to achieve the purpose of raising wages through professional title evaluation. The salary of senior teachers in primary and secondary schools is more than that of teachers with intermediate titles 1000 yuan.

Secondly, it has caused new unfairness.

The same work is more and better than that done by senior teachers. However, the wage difference is more than 1000 yuan, which leads to unfairness. It also dampened the enthusiasm of teachers.

Third, there are many links in the title system of primary and secondary school teachers, which is easy to breed corruption!

Teachers who have selected senior teachers all have the same feeling: tired!

One level after another, each level needs to be opened. Everyone has to pay the price, and when they get through customs, they are already black and blue and have no sense of joy! There are even teachers who spit, and every level is clearly marked! Sad and hateful!

Fourthly, the evaluation system of primary and secondary school teachers' professional titles has seriously distracted teachers' attention. Lost the original pursuit of education.

When everyone lives all day for open classes, projects, papers, honors, etc. The original function and pursuit of education are gone. Put the cart before the horse.

Fifth, the evaluation system of professional titles in primary and secondary schools has increased the economic burden of teachers.

This system not only involves teachers' energy, but also brings great economic burden to teachers. Not to mention the cost of "customs clearance". Teachers pay a high price just for "publishing"! It is said that the cost varies according to the level of publication. Under normal circumstances, teachers publish an article, ranging from 1000 to thousands! The author once took the job of "ghostwriting" and commented on a special article, with a remuneration of 5,000 yuan.

Of course, the abolition of the professional title system will have a positive impact on teacher education.

Looking forward to it!

If teachers' professional titles are linked to teachers' salaries, teachers should actively strive for the promotion of professional titles, because high professional titles and high salaries are conducive to the promotion of professional titles! Teachers all know the conditions for promotion, and acquaintances with connections can use anything. Whether it matters or not, they will try their best to teach books well and strive for a good ranking in every unified exam, which will also add points. However, it is not easy to study hard and get good grades. The ranking of general exams mostly depends on the average score of students in your class. If there are several mentally retarded, hyperactive or lazy students in your class, the teacher doesn't know how hard it takes to improve his grades. Otherwise, there are three or five grades in Class One, and your class will definitely be behind. It is certainly not easy for a teacher with poor grades to be promoted to a professional title. Some old teachers have not been promoted to the first-level title until retirement! Therefore, if teachers want to teach students in accordance with their aptitude, we should see that there are many excellent students in all aspects in the class taught by teachers. Whoever has more excellent students in all aspects of his class will be excellent, and of course he will be promoted quickly! But the title should not be linked to the salary too much, so that the salary difference at each level does not exceed that in 200 yuan, and everyone will not care so much.

Have a nice day!

It has been recognized by teachers that linking teachers' professional titles with salaries does more harm than good.

1, teachers teach and educate people, not workers produce products, and teachers cannot be measured by workers' standards. The evaluation of teachers' professional titles takes students' grades as an important content, and teachers engage in teaching just like workers pursue students' grades by producing products.

2. Teachers' professional title system artificially violates the laws of education and teaching, forcing teachers to evaluate their professional titles, which violates the laws of education and teaching. In the actual education and teaching process, students' personality is not respected and their personal strengths are not brought into play. "Why can't China's education produce Nobel Prize winners" has something to do with the current job title evaluation. Teachers have no masters, they are just ordinary workers.

3. The evaluation of teachers' professional titles affects the relationship between school leaders and teachers. School leaders assign jobs to teachers according to their professional titles, and teachers also work according to their professional titles, and teachers work for professional titles. Teachers are suspicious of each other, and there is a lack of normal communication between jobs. I am afraid that my opponent will be the first to evaluate the title, which seriously affects the teaching work.

4. The evaluation of teachers' professional titles is time-consuming and laborious, and the information is varied, and most of them are useless. Some teachers have to resort to deception to cope with the evaluation, or spend money to find someone to write it for them. In the process of identification, it is easy to breed corruption. The staff members do not disclose Kolor's request, but say that "you know" accepting property is an undisclosed secret.

As a grass-roots educator, I hope that after the professional title evaluation is cancelled, better educational measures will be introduced to encourage teachers to teach and educate people!

I don't know what positive impact the titles and salaries of primary and secondary school teachers will have on compulsory education. I don't know how many people still want to declare their professional titles from the heart, rather than being forced to do so.

I just want to tell you that the work pressure that teachers are facing now is unprecedented. In addition to my own work, project research, joint school teaching and research, going out to learn from the scriptures, I have to go to the countryside to help the poor every week. There are basically no weekends, and I have to work overtime on holidays. Think of work, have nightmares, where there is energy to think about a few titles!

There used to be a few naughty and unreasonable children who were afraid to go to school at the beginning of school, but now it's the other way around. As soon as school starts, teachers are afraid and always want to escape. Even the youngest teacher is often exhausted and desperate.

I had a female colleague who just graduated last year. She only stayed in the class for two months. Because of the heavy work, she was too tired to stand and her health was out of order. As a result, she resigned. Three other female teachers under the age of forty all got cancer, and one of them died unfortunately. ...

A vocational school principal has been busy with poverty alleviation in rural areas for a long time and has no time to spend with his family. On the day before New Year's Day, 20 19, he wanted to go to the countryside to help the poor in advance while there was no class in the afternoon, and then go home to reunite with his family. But that day, the weather was unusually cold and it rained heavily. As a result, he had an accident on the road and could never go home again.

If it was a few years ago, they would be more keen on the relationship between professional titles and wages, because it is linked to wages after all. But now many people wake up from the unfortunate experience of colleagues next to them: health and safety are more important than anything else.

As soon as the final evaluation was made a few years ago, interpersonal relationships began to be tense. Now many people are tired of coping and have given up reporting. They are competent. To hell with it. Save time and energy for yourself and your family.

The poor front-line teacher is like a sandwich biscuit, squeezed at both ends. After working hard for a year, the year-end assessment will definitely get stuck in the paper. A paper participating in the evaluation is at least 100 yuan, ranging from a few hundred yuan, and a first-prize paper only costs 20 cents! The teaching and research activities of this unit do not exceed 1.5 credits for the whole year. It will make you exhausted to apply at different levels. Can teachers stop complaining?

It is absolutely significant to cancel the link between professional title and salary. Can be reflected in the following aspects.

First, it can effectively stimulate the enthusiasm of teachers.

As long as the teacher works hard, he gets more for more work. Why doesn't the teacher work hard?

The current professional title system, once and for all, even if nothing is done, the salary is still high. How can the teacher be okay with it?

Second, education corruption is relatively reduced.

For example, some papers can be obtained by spending money. There are also various honorary certificates, which are easier for those in power to obtain. There is also an audit process. Who can guarantee that it will be fair?

If the professional title is not linked to salary, these phenomena will naturally disappear.

Third, it is more conducive to the unity and cooperation of teachers.

For the title, teachers intrigue, abuse each other, expose each other, and everything. We don't trust each other, let alone cooperate effectively.

If the title is cancelled, our relationship will be more harmonious and United.

Fourth: Teachers can put more energy into teaching.

For the title, teachers should strive for honor, spend a lot of energy preparing papers and topics, and participate in various quality class competitions. In fact, these things do not have much effect on the actual teaching work of teachers.

It is not easy for teachers to teach and educate people and successfully complete their teaching work. Teachers nowadays can basically cope with teaching. It is not that the teacher is not serious, but that there is no time to be serious at all.

If the professional title is not linked to salary, teachers will naturally put more energy into teaching.

The current professional title system has seriously hindered the healthy development of education. Personally, even if it can't be cancelled, it must be substantially reformed.

1, reduce the proportion of professional titles in wages, and give priority to seniority wages.

2, can refer to the civil service system, to the fixed number of years of natural promotion, especially excellent can be promoted 2 to 3 years in advance, those who fail the examination can be postponed for 2 to 3 years.

3, teaching is mainly based on teaching achievement assessment, other aspects can use the examination system. Minimize the interference of human factors, which is fairer and more scientific.

Professional titles should benefit more ordinary teachers, not the so-called minority. Because every school does not rely on a few excellent students to improve the quality of teaching, ordinary teachers play a greater role.

Professional titles have never been a panacea for education. Today, the development of education depends not on professional titles, but on the dedication of thousands of ordinary teachers in Qian Qian. Without the dedication of these ordinary front-line teachers, our education in China could not have developed so fast.

Even with gratitude and pity, we cannot ignore their existence!

Look forward to it slowly!

I think it will play a positive role in compulsory education to cancel the link between the professional titles of primary and secondary school teachers and their salaries!

The moral education we received when we were young was "distribution according to work, more work and more, less work and less". If other occupations (labor) exist "multiple income modes coexist", then the basic national policy of teachers, especially those with career establishment, is contradictory!

Teachers can't get dividends by participating in schools, and they can't get generous welfare benefits at present. The rewards they get from their labor are mainly wages (including performance). To put it bluntly, they mainly rely on financial allocations.

The most critical point that affects teachers' income is often not the labor value they create, but their "professional titles", "qualifications" and "positions".

We can't say that people with high positions, high professional titles and deep qualifications will be lazy and pay less labor, but what we can see is that under the same circumstances (such as teachers at the same level), they have not achieved equal pay for equal work, let alone distribution according to work!

Why don't most teachers want to be class teachers? Why are those new teachers often the head teachers of primary schools? We don't rule out the purpose of "scouring the sand with big waves", but to put it bluntly, many people would rather not have a little subsidy from the class teacher than pay more labor-the biggest problem is that their labor is completely out of proportion to the return.

I said above, "equal pay for equal work".

Therefore, the profession of teachers has gradually become a "conscience work"!

Let me give you an example: my child's head teacher is a fresh graduate, taking us from grade one to grade five. Under her leadership, with the joint efforts of parents and children, the children have achieved good results one after another. For those of us who work outside, such excellent teachers should be highly rewarded and well paid! Excellent talents can't make them get relative material satisfaction. Do you expect them to rely on "dreams" to support their daily hard work all day?

However, these young teachers will not get direct feedback from their income, no matter how much they pay. Moreover, the more realistic problem is that your Excellence will often arouse the envy of others-they are all Millennium foxes. What are you playing?

The reality is that young teachers have to bow to the "professional title" after their passion is exhausted-because the most direct means to improve their treatment is to promote their professional titles! However, it is not enough for you to just improve your professional title. I believe many people are very clear about this, right?

There's nothing to say about this. Where there is money and power, there are rivers and lakes. ...

Fairness, at least relative fairness, is the foundation of harmony.

What do people work for?

The first thing to be solved is actually the problem of survival, which can't be done without money.

You can describe a job in written language as extremely noble and tall, but people always have to eat, drink and sleep, don't you? Teachers are human beings, aren't they gods?

Actually, it's not just a teacher. Now there are many "professional titles" in all walks of life. Interested people can search for it themselves, which will definitely open your eyes.

I don't object that high professional titles correspond to high income, because although some people get high professional titles, there are still many people who are worthy of the name. And as an affirmation and recognition of their past labor and value creation, I am in favor of retaining the title. But I object to equating income with professional title directly, simply and rudely!

I know there is no absolute fairness, but it can make people who work hard get enough rewards. I think this is the most cost-effective fairness!

In order to promote the professional title, chaos and smoke are everywhere. Some teachers work overtime, grab classes and occupy classes, which disturbs the normal teaching order. Although the education bureau and the school explicitly prohibit it, they still go their own way, with only one purpose of promotion and more money. This leads to the unbalanced development of some students' subjects. Teachers who have no hope of promotion have no choice but to ……, and teachers are not so harmonious for promotion … They spend money to write papers for promotion … and so on. Campus should be full of sunshine, vitality, harmony and positivity, and teachers should spread positive energy to students, but the reality is that some schools have become vanity fair. The saddest thing is that the soul of an individual is polluted by fame and fortune.

I am a teacher of compulsory education. Removing the link between teachers' grades and salaries will indeed have a positive impact on compulsory education. I fully support it. I agree with both hands.

Professional title is called the "cancer" of education, which has become an unspeakable pain for teachers and a stumbling block to the growth and development of schools and even teachers. From 65438 to 0986, the teacher title system has been implemented for 33 years, which has deviated from the original intention and exposed many problems. In particular, teachers' professional titles are linked to wages, which has many disadvantages and has been criticized repeatedly.

As a senior teacher, whether in the front line of education or not, the monthly punch-in salary is higher than that of teachers with lower titles 1000 yuan or more. The abolition of teachers' professional titles eliminates the disadvantages and introduces innovation. Education will be clean and upright, return to its origin, teachers will teach with peace of mind, schools will become a pure land, and education revitalization is just around the corner, not a dream?

The origin of education lies in respecting the laws of education, putting people first, cultivating people and promoting the healthy growth and harmonious development of children. However, contrary to expectations, today's education is divorced from the truth, from the source and from the essence. The fundamental reason is that teachers are lost in confusion, lost in pursuit and lack of motivation ... Who caused the disaster? This is an outrageous title.

The teacher title system has been implemented for 33 years! Professional titles have not only failed to arouse teachers' enthusiasm, but have become a bottleneck restricting teachers' development. The key to the revitalization of education lies in teachers. Teachers' professional titles are decoupled from wages, and teachers are no longer bound by increasing wage income. Teachers naturally put their energy into education and teaching, and the development of education naturally comes naturally.

Nowadays, the title of a teacher makes the school "smoky". Every "title season", the school is no longer a pure land, and an undercurrent surges randomly. Last year, our school assessed that 42 teachers were qualified to be promoted to senior titles, and the index ratio issued by the higher authorities was 1: 20, which means that the school only has two index places, and the competition is extremely fierce. From beginning to end, the school never stopped crying. Is this still school? Once the title is decoupled from the salary, the teacher's title becomes a symbol of "honor", the teacher gradually fades out, the school gradually becomes peaceful, and the pure land of education is not a dream.

Schools are important places for teaching and educating people. Teaching and educating people is the bounden duty of teachers. Teachers should think calmly, teach with peace of mind and concentrate on educating people. "The ideal is full and the reality is very skinny." Teachers suffer from professional titles every day. How can they immerse themselves in front-line education and teaching? If teachers' professional titles are decoupled from their salaries, teachers will no longer be busy and worried about their professional titles, nor will they pursue them. Then, the majority of front-line teachers will naturally return to the classroom, do research in a down-to-earth manner, concentrate on scientific research and teach with peace of mind!

The original intention of designing the professional title system is to classify the professional and technical level of teachers and determine the salary level according to the level. The higher the level, the higher the salary, which conforms to the law of value, and can also promote teachers' continuous learning and improvement, thus improving the overall quality of teachers.

However, in practice, due to the design defects of the professional title evaluation system, there are too many subjective factors that cannot be accurately quantified in the evaluation process, which often leads to unfair job evaluation results. At the same time, some scoring rules are unscientific and easy to exploit loopholes, so they have been criticized. Especially among front-line teachers, there is a high demand to cancel the title system or to cancel the link between title level and salary.

Abolishing the professional title system is another topic, which will not be discussed here. Let's discuss the positive impact if the title level is no longer linked to salary.

There must be some positive effects. You don't need to buy a paper layout, participate in all kinds of meaningless awards, ask for relationships everywhere, colleagues no longer compete for titles, and you are no longer flushed in the annual assessment ... The most important thing is that the psychological imbalance of teachers is not caused by the widening income gap of titles.

However, if the professional title level is not linked to salary, the professional title system will basically lose its value. However, teachers, as professional technicians, should follow the principle of high quality and good price. So, how will this be defined?

One view is that teachers' salary should be mainly linked to the length of service. There is no doubt that the salary of teaching experience should occupy an important proportion in the composition of teachers' salary, which can not only motivate teachers to teach for life, but also affirm teachers' long-term contribution. However, if the salary is mainly paid according to the length of teaching, it will also have great disadvantages, which will raise lazy people and encourage the atmosphere of mixed good and bad and lack of progress.

One view is that teachers' salaries should be determined according to their posts. Teachers are paid no matter what position they hold. Post salary can reflect the principle of more work and more pay, and can also be adjusted according to performance (teaching results), giving consideration to efficiency and fairness. However, education and teaching work has its particularity, and some hidden things, such as moral education and cultural infiltration, cannot be quantitatively evaluated, which is related to teachers' professional ethics, teaching methods, cultural background and experience. It is also biased to determine teachers' salary simply by post and performance.

Most importantly, if teachers' titles are meaningless, teachers' professional development will lose its direction. It turns out that the titles of teachers are only junior, middle and advanced, which is too few, and advanced ones are even out of reach. Many teachers lose their enthusiasm for work after being rated as intermediate, and muddle along. In this way, teachers will not actively pursue professional growth. If a teacher can't study all his life, he can't live on his laurels for long.

Therefore, it is no problem to link teachers' professional titles with salaries. The problem is to reform the professional title evaluation system and develop in a fair, just, scientific and reasonable direction, which can promote the professional growth of teachers.

For example, refer to the civil service job series and increase the title level; Shorten the promotion cycle of professional titles and have promotion opportunities every two or three years; Organize a unified national professional title examination. Those who pass the examination in principle will be promoted smoothly.

At the same time, because of the increase of professional titles, the wage difference between adjacent professional titles is relatively reduced, and teachers are not easy to have a psychological gap. Moreover, because "there is always a future to go", teachers have a head start in life, hope in life, and work will be energetic.