The so-called framework, for example: 1. First break the question-that is, "what is it"; Then analysis, analysis can include meaning, reason, influence, the relationship between the two elements and so on; Then, contact reality: you can contact historical allusions, social events, your past experiences, what you can do in the future, and suggestions for social events. 2. For example, the problem of interpersonal relationship can be followed: first talk about the truth, then analyze the reasons, and then talk about the practice. 3. You can answer them one by one with reasons and countermeasures. 4. For philosophy, we can answer questions from different angles of understanding and take interpersonal relationship as the premise. All of the above are "big frames", that is to say, not every part involved is necessarily available. Just build a big frame, which one do you want to use and which one works well. At the same time, these ideas I have provided are not all. You can summarize them yourself during the preparation process.
The so-called angle, for example: 1. To answer the reasons, we can think from the aspects of system, management and investment, and the countermeasures are the same, such as what help can be provided to the poor, such as material, rights protection, emotion and follow-up. 2. Views on events can be positive or negative, or compromise after positive or negative. 3. It can be answered from the perspective of different parties to the same incident. For example, a cancer patient kneels in front of an enterprise for help. This incident involves patients, enterprises and the media, and even the government. Summarizing the thinking angle of answering questions will help you clear your mind quickly in a limited and tense time.