In the Opinions on Accelerating the Reform and Development of Postgraduate Education in the New Era, it is proposed to strengthen the post management of tutors, clarify the responsibilities of tutors, and incorporate political performance, teachers' morality, academic level, guiding energy input and educational effectiveness into the assessment system.
I think this is undoubtedly a manifestation of the improvement of the education management system. Such an assessment standard will not only improve the educational level of tutors and their ability to guide graduate students, but also be a kind of welfare for graduate students. For graduate students, the happiest thing in their study process is to meet a tutor and maybe become a good friend. So what? Mentor and friend? The form of graduate tutor will exist under such high requirements. Of course, I'm not saying that there would be no such mentors without these policies. Maybe there will be more such mentors under these policies.
About what? Clarify the boundaries of mentor responsibilities? I think this evaluation is also necessary. Tutors should not interfere with graduate students' lives under the premise of performing their duties, nor should they forcibly interfere with their privacy when they care about graduate students' lives, so it is enough to perform their duties as tutors. About what? Political performance? In fact, I think a qualified citizen will still consider political performance, so it is also a very correct choice to take this as part of the assessment as a guide. The second one is about? Teachers' morality and style, academic level? In my opinion, this is an assessment standard to see whether a person is suitable to be a teacher, and it is also the basis for whether he can be a teacher. Especially as a tutor of the graduate team, we should understand the importance of teachers' morality and style. It is even worse to put this in the assessment criteria, and I quite agree with it. Last one? Guiding energy input, that is, educating people effectively? This is a test of the results. In educating people, the result is the best realization of the process and also a test of the strength of the guide.
Taking these as the criteria for evaluating tutors, I think it is a very effective way to standardize tutors' behavior. I believe that under these standards, our tutors and graduate students will get better and better in the future!