? In fact, I think there is something wrong with closed management across the board. Many students disapprove of closed management across the board. For example, recently, students are closed to management, but teachers are free to enter and leave. This is actually very unreasonable. Teachers and students have equal status in prevention and control. Therefore, if the management is to be completely closed, it is better for teachers and students to be closed except those who need to go out for shopping. Of course, I think this kind of closed management needs proper accommodation. Have priorities. If students do have special circumstances, they should be flexible. Students can't say that because of closed management, they are not allowed to go out under any circumstances. This is very bad and inhuman. So I think closed management is really reasonable. No matter for students, teachers and leaders, prevention and control management should be equal, and prevention and control has no position. Since we want closed management, we should try our best to make everyone equal.

? There are many college students in China, and once closed management is not carried out, the turnover of personnel is very large. This is not conducive to prevention and control, so closed management still has certain benefits. It just means that closed management should not be across the board, be reasonable and learn to be accommodating, but this accommodation is limited. Students can't rely on accommodation, so they don't pay attention to the closed management of the school, and the school can't be accommodating because of closed management. Just comprehensive. Therefore, if there is no big problem, the school only needs to improve the closed management mode and flexibly carry out closed management, which can be done. In fact, for the safety of every student, it is necessary to minimize going out. It's not bad to stay at school. Try to cooperate with the school.