The content is confidential, but it does not say that the identity is confidential, nor does it say that the score is confidential. If there are few people in your department, people can basically know how many points you give.

After graduating from undergraduate course, I received it many times and filled in the worst evaluation every time. I heard that someone was called by the school, so I had to "fill in". After someone changed from bad review to good review, they never received an email again. I changed my phone number several times, and I kept getting bad reviews. I didn't get any phone calls, but I kept getting emails. The more annoying I am, the more I want to fill in bad reviews. Maybe everyone's evaluation is average, and now this major has been withdrawn.

I received this postgraduate questionnaire, but I'm not going to fill it out. There is nothing good or bad, but I don't want to judge. I can't say what I don't want to say, and I don't know how to say what I want to say Just ask if you got it.

User evaluation:

Received, gave full marks to the relevant indicators of my alma mater, because I think she deserves a better title; Give the tutor personal relevant scores, truthfully a few extremely conservative "conformity" and less restrained "very nonconformity", because his teacher's morality can't afford those full marks.

I hesitated before filling it out, but after careful inspection, I found that this questionnaire was issued by the Ministry of Education after all, and I filled it out decisively and truthfully. After filling it out, I knew that this could not guarantee complete anonymity, and I also fell into a period of fear.

But now, I figured it out. Isn't it time for graduate students to seek truth from facts, whether it is effective or not?