Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Which do you think is more important than social education?
Which do you think is more important than social education?
First of all, I want to emphasize that school education and social education cannot be compared. School education and social education are both necessary components of education, which together with family education constitute a complete education.

Education must start with family education, and then get involved in school education and social education.

If expressed by the theory of three circles, a child can be at the intersection of family education, school education and social education, then he must have enjoyed the best education.

The lack of any kind of education will bring great problems to the educated.

The benign joint efforts of family education, school education and social education can cultivate high-quality talents with perfect personality, strong will, independent spirit, quick thinking and strong action.

The relationship between these three kinds of education is complementary and indispensable, and there is no difference. In fact, it is inappropriate to rank the importance of the three, which is prone to problems such as shirking responsibility, unclear methods and confused thinking.

Secondly, the emphasis of family education, school education and social education is different. Family education focuses on the cultivation of feelings, and parents should educate their children to know how to feel, care and be grateful.

School education focuses on developing intelligence, and teachers should educate children to think, love learning and make progress.

Social education focuses on rational cognition, and society should educate children to obey the rules and understand them, so as to realize personal growth within the framework of morality and law.

However, it should be noted that these are only the respective emphases of the three kinds of education, which does not mean that they are the only emphases. In fact, every kind of education has the main functions of the other two kinds of education.

For example, family education will also inspire children's intellectual education and teach them to be reasonable, honest, moral and law-abiding, which takes into account the functions of school education and social education.

While opening up students' wisdom, school education will also guide students to be kind, know honor and disgrace, distinguish right from wrong and distinguish between black and white. A good teacher is virtuous, teaches well by example, and moistens things quietly, which is of great reference to the shaping of students' personality! The moral and legal courses, humanities education and aesthetic education offered by the school are closely related to social education.

Social education, through all kinds of people, big and small things, let children know that "life is yearning for freedom, but it is full of shackles", and more is self-discipline and restraint of desire. At the same time, it is also further improving children's thinking, enlightening children's wisdom, increasing children's ability to solve problems, and improving the lack of "practice" in school education. Among them, I saw truth, goodness and beauty, and also witnessed falsehood, ugliness and ugliness. In the process of stumbling, the children also realized the preciousness of love and the love of their parents and family.

Third, the stage characteristics of family education, school education and social education are obvious. Before school, family education is the mainstay; During school, school education is the mainstay; After entering the society, social education is the main thing.

At each stage, the main strength of education is different, and the stage characteristics are also different.

However, these three kinds of education are accompanied by everyone's life. They penetrate each other, closely combine, and cannot be separated.

Is it unreasonable and immoral to talk about love? Isn't reasoning enlightening and emotional? Isn't enlightenment also about empathy and rules?

In addition, from birth to octogenarian, everyone is constantly changing the role of the educated and educators.

To sum up: in my opinion, we can't compare the three kinds of education separately, which is not conducive to the integrity and systematicness of education. Educators at each stage and in different links should give attention to the other two kinds of education while highlighting their own roles, so that the educated can get the most complete education. Never strive for merit, thinking that you are the most important part of the success of education; Don't pass the buck and blame all the children with problems on other educational deficiencies.

Are you satisfied with the swordsman's answer? Welcome to leave a message and share your opinion.