Skills of civil servant's written examination: how to define judgment skillfully? Definition judgment belongs to the "judgment reasoning" module in line test. The topic of defining judgment covers a wide range, involving politics, economy, law, psychology and other fields. Many students think that the content of the topic is more professional, and they can't understand it, but the options are wrong.

In fact, a large part of the problem of defining judgment can be solved by three techniques: "paying attention to defined items, merging similar items and enumerating and excluding".

First, pay attention to the defined project.

To define and judge the order of solving problems, first look at the question method. There may be multiple definitions in the stem, but the question method may only ask one of them. At this time, you can pay attention to the defined items.

Second, merge similar projects.

When time is short and the definition is difficult to understand, we can analyze the options, merge the isomorphic options with the same meaning, summarize the options into 2- 1- 1 or 3- 1, and quickly eliminate them. Pay special attention to the "1" option, because the correct answer is likely to be it.

Third, enumeration exclusion method

Suitable for long definitions, and the scope of definitions has been listed in the form of examples. At this time, we only need to correspond the listed situations with the options one by one.

How does the judgment and reasoning module do? I. Judgement and Reasoning In the national examination, logical judgment, graphic reasoning, analogical reasoning and definition judgment are four common test questions, and each test question is 10. There are five questions at the city and prefecture levels in the form of one question and five questions. Graphic reasoning prefecture level is simpler than sub-provincial level. The definition and judgment of propositions are more flexible, presented in the form of poems, proverbs, ancient prose and pictures. Analogical reasoning focuses on the relationship between concepts and common sense.

Dashu Vocational Education, as a local enterprise in Guizhou focusing on public examination/compilation training, has rich experience. If you have any questions about this, you can ask them in the comments section! Wang Qiancheng Dashu Vocational Education won the championship in the provincial examination interview for three consecutive years, ranking first in the province!

Second, the focus of the investigation (1) graphic reasoning

1. inspection focus: graphic commonness, quantitative relationship, three-dimensional graphics. Among them, the frequency of graphic symmetry and relative position is higher; Three-dimensional graphics test sites are diverse and difficult, including space folding, three views, sectional views and three-dimensional splicing.

2. Preparation strategy: master the basic test sites, practice once a day, cultivate graphic sensitivity, and clarify the problem-solving ideas.

Graphic reasoning looks messy, but it's all regular. The premise is to be familiar with the test center and its characteristics.

1, with the same graphic composition, the displacement method is preferred; 2. If the graphic composition is similar, the style rule shall prevail; 3, the composition of graphics is different, considering quantity or attribute;

(B) the definition of judgment

1. exam focus: the concepts of sociology, psychology, literature, law and management are often tested.

2. Preparation strategy: master the analysis method of defining and judging the core components, fully understand the definition connotation, accumulate social hotspots and broaden the common sense reserve.

(3) Analogical reasoning

1. Focus: functional relationship, processing relationship, professional relationship in experience and common sense, semantic relationship in speech relationship, conceptual relationship in logical relationship.

2. Preparation strategy: master the basic test sites, think normally, and analyze the essential relationship between words. Accumulate common sense.

Logical judgment

1. emphasis: necessity reasoning focuses on hypothetical propositions, comprehensive reasoning and naive logic. Possibility reasoning focuses on strengthening, weakening and presupposition; Judging from the demonstration model, the frequency of different demonstration and practical demonstration is high; Among them, the comparison of option strength is the focus of possibility reasoning.

2. Preparation strategy: There is a great difference between logic and life thinking, which requires systematic study to change thinking, a large number of brushing questions to master reasoning rules and frequent test demonstration models, thus forming an efficient problem-solving thinking path.

Third, how to improve the speed of solving problems? It is very important to improve the speed of doing problems while ensuring the correct rate.

1, quickly grab effective information and read dry materials.

(1) Grasp the object of each sentence and understand the meaning of the sentence.

(2) Contact the context and analyze the relationship between sentences.

(3) Grasp the author's writing intention and judge the key points of the materials.

Fourth, find the correct order of doing the questions 1, and the order of doing the questions in each module of the whole test paper.

(1) Candidates with less common sense accumulation: speech comprehension, data analysis, judgment and reasoning, and the relationship between common sense and quantity.

(2) Candidates who have accumulated more common sense: common sense-speech understanding-data analysis-judgment reasoning-quantitative relationship.

Of course, the order of doing the questions varies from person to person. The general principle is: put the modules that you are good at in the front position and grasp the points that you can do. In the national examination, we should pay attention to key questions to ensure the correct rate reaches 80%, such as: paragraph reading 15, article reading 10, data analysis 20, logical judgment 10.

2, the order of each question.

In the face of a problem, we must first look at the method of asking questions. On the one hand, the question types are identified by asking questions, and then the problem-solving methods and option selection principles are determined. On the other hand, reading materials with questions can be targeted. In addition, candidates must see whether there are "negative words" in the way of asking questions. For example, according to the above definition, the following does not belong to the complementary proposition of opposites (). This kind of "choosing the wrong topic" should be especially careful.

Fifth, learn to give up the most important point reasonably: give up decisively when encountering problems. When encountering a difficult problem, don't dwell on wasting time. This time it depends on who gives up first. According to the characteristics of uniform distribution of options, this kind of problem can be finally solved.

Giving up reasonably is a science. The line test looks at the total score. Instead of wasting time on difficult problems, it is better to spend time on simple topics and avoid losing points on topics that can be done right because there is no time to do them. I'll give you two suggestions.

(1) Evaluate your own shortcomings and choose different types of topics. For example, for candidates with a particularly weak mathematical foundation, Zhonggong Education suggests that you give up some or all of the quantitative relationship questions, give up the last small question of each data analysis and get the answer directly. This can save a lot of time, thus improving the accuracy of other modules and grasping the points that can be done and obtained.

(2) the difficulty of dividing the topic, don't be too entangled in the topic that has no clue and is not sure about the answer. Trust your first feeling and choose quickly. If you give up the topic, you can get the answer first and mark it, and then go back and solve it when you have time.

The line test is a competitive test, and getting high marks is our goal. On the premise of combining their own advantages and disadvantages, candidates must work out their own scoring strategies. In addition, we should understand that all theories are based on practice, and all skills are based on a lot of practice.

The above is the content about how to improve the speed of problem-solving, judgment and reasoning compiled by Wang Qiancheng Dashu Vocational Education. If you want to know more about the examination/selection of civil servants, the recruitment of public institutions, teachers, banks and state-owned enterprises, or want to ask questions, Bian Xiao can answer them for you! Welcome to official website for details!