This paper mainly discusses the connotation, establishment principle and specific content of the evaluation standard of ideological and political education.
Paper Keywords ideological and political education evaluation criteria
First, the connotation of the evaluation standard of ideological and political education
To understand what is the evaluation standard of ideological and political education, we must first understand what is the evaluation standard. Evaluation standard is the value scale and boundary that people apply to the object in evaluation activities. The evaluation criteria reflect the needs of the subjects. The evaluation standard is a unified system.
First, the evaluation standard system is the unity of conscious and unconscious standards. The subject can be aware of many needs of the subject, so the subject can consciously evaluate whether the object is meaningful to the subject based on these needs. We call the conscious demand of the subject the conscious standard of evaluation activities. For many other needs of the subject, the subject is unaware. We call the unconscious needs of the subject the unconscious standard.
Conscious evaluation criteria and unconscious evaluation criteria play their respective roles in self-evaluation activities. They complement each other, depend on each other and are in the main evaluation standard system together.
Second, the evaluation standard system is the unity of rational standards and irrational standards. The rational standard and irrational standard mentioned here are mainly about the form that the subject needs to embody in the concept. The so-called rational standard refers to the evaluation standard expressed by the subject in the form of rational thinking such as concept, norm, judgment and reasoning; The so-called irrational standard refers to the evaluation standard that the subject can't express with rational thinking modes such as concept, norm, judgment and reasoning.
Rational standard is the evaluation standard expressed in rational form by the subject after rational thinking. Generally speaking, it can correctly reflect the needs of the subject, but the rational standard is by no means equal to the correct standard. Irrational standard is an evaluation standard that has not been rationally thought by the subject, but is expressed in an irrational form. Generally speaking, sometimes it can't correctly reflect the needs of the subject, but irrational standards are by no means equal to wrong standards.
Third, the evaluation standard is the unity of diversity standard and identity standard. The diversity of evaluation criteria refers to the diversity of evaluation criteria brought about by the multi-level needs and diversity of subjects. The unity of evaluation criteria means that although there are various evaluation criteria, the most fundamental evaluation criterion is whether it is conducive to the survival and development of the subject. This is the unification of evaluation criteria.
Fourthly, the evaluation standard is the unity of rheological standard and stability standard. The demand of the subject is not only varied, but also constantly changing and developing. This required flow deformation determines the evaluation standard of flow deformation. At the same time, the subject is also stable. You are you and he is him.
In practice, some people only see the flow and deformation of evaluation criteria, thinking that it is only the interests and will of the subject, so there are no rules and no objective basis; Some people ignore the flowing deformation of evaluation criteria and grasp the long-term and stability of some evaluation criteria. They are regarded as transcendental principles unrelated to the needs of the subject. Neither view is desirable.
Above, we have analyzed the connotation and characteristics of the evaluation standard, from which we can say that the evaluation standard of ideological and political education is an objective measure to measure the value of ideological and political education. That is, the subject of ideological and political education evaluation knows and the standard of evaluation object. The evaluation standard of ideological and political education plays an extremely important role in the whole evaluation system of ideological and political education.
On the one hand, it is the guarantee for the smooth progress of ideological and political education evaluation activities. Any evaluation activity is inseparable from certain evaluation criteria, which are the externalization of evaluation subject consciousness. It externalizes the needs of the subject into certain standards, and uses these standards to judge whether the process and results of ideological and political education meet the needs of the subject, or to what extent. The reason why evaluation criteria are an indispensable part of the whole evaluation system is that without evaluation criteria, evaluation activities will lose their direction and the realization of evaluation purposes will be impossible.
On the other hand, it is the key to realize the evaluation purpose of ideological and political education. The evaluation of ideological and political education refers to the value judgment of the process and result of ideological and political education by using qualitative and quantitative scientific methods according to certain evaluation standards. Whether the evaluation standard is correct or not is directly related to whether the value judgment of the process and result of ideological and political education is correct, and then it also affects the final realization of the evaluation purpose.
The evaluation standard of ideological and political education evaluation is actually the response of the evaluation subject's needs and the result of the externalization of the evaluation subject's needs. Evaluation criteria are not immutable. It changes with the change of demand. The correct evaluation criteria should reflect the needs of social development and human development, that is, the evaluation criteria are based on the needs of the subject, that is, the needs of social progress and human development and their changes, and the needs of the subject constitute the evaluation scale.
Second, establish the principles of evaluation criteria for ideological and political education
Whether the evaluation standard of ideological and political education is correct or not is directly related to the success or failure of the value evaluation of ideological and political education, so the correct principles must be followed when determining the evaluation standard of ideological and political education.
1. Objectivity principle: Objectivity principle is the first principle to determine the evaluation of ideological and political education. The principle of objectivity mentioned here means that when determining the evaluation criteria, we should consider both the objective needs of the evaluation subject and the objective reality of the evaluated object. Because the subject and object of evaluation are the two poles of evaluation activities, and they are also an important part of evaluation activities. Therefore, these two factors must be fully considered when establishing the evaluation standard, so as to make the evaluation standard more accurate.
First of all, the formulation of evaluation criteria should fully consider the objective needs of evaluation subjects. Because the demand of the evaluation subject is the main content of the evaluation standard, it is also an important reason for the evaluation activities to be carried out. Only when the evaluation criteria correctly reflect the needs of the evaluation subjects can the evaluation activities develop in the right direction, and the evaluation activities can be carried out smoothly and achieve the expected purpose.
Secondly, the evaluation criteria should objectively reflect the actual situation of the evaluated object. Whether using qualitative or quantitative methods, or combining qualitative and quantitative methods, it is necessary to collect and analyze the data of the evaluated object. The correctness of the data of the evaluated object is related to the correctness of the evaluation results. Therefore, we should also adhere to the principle of objectivity to determine the evaluation criteria. Too high a standard will dampen the enthusiasm of the evaluated object, while too low a standard will not reflect the significance of evaluation.
The evaluation of ideological and political education is a kind of value judgment, which must be based on factual judgment. Adhering to the objectivity principle of ideological and political education evaluation requires that the evaluation criteria should objectively and truly reflect the objective needs of the evaluation subject, and the needs of the evaluation subject can guide the whole evaluation activity to develop in the expected direction through the evaluation criteria. On the other hand, the evaluation criteria should also consider the deeds of the evaluated object. The standard cannot be higher or lower than the actual situation of the evaluated object.
2. Pedagogy principle: The evaluation of ideological and political education is a process of analyzing information and drawing evaluation conclusions. Its ultimate goal is to educate the evaluation object, standardize and promote the formation and development of its good ideological and political morality, and guide it to socialism? Four? The direction of new development. Therefore, the evaluation subject should obey this ultimate goal when determining the evaluation standard, so that the evaluation standard can not only provide the evaluation scale for the evaluation subject, but also achieve the purpose of educating the evaluation object.
The purpose of establishing evaluation criteria is to adhere to the educational principles, and to fully implement the educational policy in the evaluation criteria, cultivate the good ideological and political morality of the evaluated person, and enhance the actual educational effect of the whole ideological and political education. If the evaluation standard of ideological and political education can't reflect the educational principle, then the whole evaluation activity is in danger of deviating from the correct direction, making the evaluation work go through the motions and engage in formalism, which is not only not conducive to appraising the ideological and moral level of the appraisee, but also easy to produce adverse consequences. Therefore, we must adhere to the principle of education.