The reason is: 1. Different teaching facilities.
2. The level of teachers is obvious.
3. Growing environment, learning environment affects children's growth
4. The hardware support needed for all-round development can be seen.
Please watch my video answer.
It's really better to go to school in the provincial capital. I am also the father of two children. I am deeply touched by your idea. No matter compared with the provincial capital, it is better than the children in the countryside below. Look at the gap with the children in the county. This gap is not only the gap in children's learning, but also their vision, thoughts, feelings, ways and means of dealing with others, personality and so on. It's not the overall gap between small counties and rural areas I mentioned.
Nowadays, no matter what resources are tilting towards the city, good teachers, good doctors and talents from all walks of life can't satisfy them.
Of course, when we all want to go to big cities to educate our children, we should also look at our own economic strength. If our economic strength permits, we should go to big cities. After all, everything is for the children and everything is for them. Give children a better starting point.
It is suggested that the provincial capital is much better than the county in terms of educational resources and environment, but it must be a school with a relatively upper-middle level in the provincial capital. The suggested stage is above junior high school.
School is not important, what matters is how well children can learn. Teachers' attitude towards children and external supporting hardware facilities account for a small part. I was born in the 1980s. When I was in junior high school, I passed the provincial senior high school entrance examination, and later I was admitted to Tsinghua. Children in our rural areas are also academically successful, distributed in all walks of life and glowing.
Not necessarily. Let's not talk about anything else, but it's really not necessarily a question of education.
I will make a list of things around me and share it with you.
I work in Suzhou, Jiangsu now, but my hometown is Nantong, Jiangsu.
Everyone in Nantong should have heard of education to some extent. Jiangsu province ranks high in the college entrance examination every year, and today is no exception. There are many high scores. This is not my boast. You can check it. Some people may say that it is useless to do well in the exam and to study hard.
China has been advocating quality education in recent years, but the college entrance examination is still a test paper of life, and it still depends on the results. It's no use saying goodbye, but you can't write. You will eventually be admitted according to your grades. I didn't even qualify for admission if I didn't do well in the exam. Although it is changing, it takes time.
Let's look at the education in Suzhou, my city. Few people get high marks. Although the undergraduate online rate is ok, there is still a big gap compared with Nantong. There are many reasons for this.
The hardware facilities in our hometown are not as good as those in Suzhou. I remember when we were in high school. There is nothing outside the school, we can only study in the fields and in the countryside, and there is nothing else to think about. But big cities are different. There is a commercial street outside the school. Shopping is very convenient and everything is available. I think it still has some influence on my study.
In a word, I don't think going to school in the county is necessarily worse than going to school in the city.
I don't know what you think.
This problem needs to be determined dialectically according to its own situation. Personally, I think: (1) If children can match and coordinate with the teaching angle in big cities and parents' economy can support them, the educational resources in cities will definitely be better than those in local counties. (2) If there is a mismatch between the children's learning situation at school and the parents' economic situation, it is recommended to consider it carefully. After all, it is very important to teach students in accordance with their aptitude. In a word, this problem is not absolute, but relative. Poor families can give birth to expensive children, but compared with urban people, how many opportunities and time are needed, as well as sweat and hard work.
Being in the provincial capital is naturally better than being in the county. Although gold shines everywhere, it is always buried in the mound. So the environment is also very important.
First of all, the teachers in provincial capitals must be stronger. If the same student is taught by teachers of different levels, his gains and development will definitely be different. Secondly, the hardware conditions and teaching facilities in the provincial capital will not be worse than those in the county, which is conducive to the all-round development of children; Finally, the overall level of the class is also an important factor. Being the first in a poor class will be complacent, lacking opponents and enterprising spirit. Good classes, strong learning atmosphere, fierce competition and great progress.
The provincial capital may have more educational resources and better teaching quality, but the pressure of learning and competition may be relatively greater. Take learning chess as an example. It may not be easy to find a good tutor in the county, but there may be more remedial classes and better teachers in the provincial capital. It depends on children's wishes, parents' financial strength and children's education level. My humble opinion, don't spray if you don't like it!