Ma Haowen's educational philosophy is not wrong, but it is also wrong. He advocates that children learn knowledge in practice and feel what is expressed in textbooks at close range in nature. This concept is too idealistic. The so-called "entertaining" has long been said in the education field, but in today's schools in China, this idea is too idealistic, and schools in China may not be able to do it in the next ten or even twenty years. After all, the school teacher is facing a group of children. These children's moral performance is uneven, and they can't give consideration to unity. Teachers can only find a relatively balanced method in the big environment. This method may not be suitable for every student, but it is good enough for most students. Ma Yuwen only faces Ma Fei. He doesn't have to worry about a way to take care of both A and B, but he is uncomfortable. Therefore, he can finally accuse the teaching director passionately, saying that the method of focusing on grades is too rigid. Just because there are many things he doesn't know. As far as movies are concerned, the opposite of his educational philosophy should not be the school. It's better to switch to Ma Fei's mother or another super good boy who only studies hard. Anyway, it's better than being a dean with serious Facebook. The role of Ma Haowen is naturally brilliant, but it is easy for the audience to feel too simple. In the movie, Ma Haowen took Ma Fei to feel the nature and go to the airplane exhibition. At any time, I will feel that such a father is really painstaking for the growth of his children. Unfortunately, these things are exactly when he took Ma Fei to play truant. I have always believed that parents are willing to hand over their children to the school, which is an agreement reached with the school in their hearts-to abide by the rules of the school. As long as there is no problem with this rule in principle, there is no reason to break it. If you feel that the school arrangement is unreasonable, you can re-choose your own school, or you can choose to report to the Education Bureau. There's really no need to go against the school. This kind of behavior will not only bring trouble to the teachers in the school, but also bring bad influence to other students. For example, if someone plagiarizes a book in the exam and the teacher doesn't take care of it, then other students will think it's no big deal to copy books in the exam, which will lead to more and more students copying books in the exam. The learning atmosphere is so bad. Ma Fei is not bad in essence. He is only a child, but what he does under his father's leadership is really not a good student. On the other hand, Ma Haowen is actually an irresponsible father. He pays too much attention to Ma Fei's game education and is "self-righteous" for his own benefit. I don't know if he ever thought about continuing to indulge Ma Fei when he was running for money. In fact, his idea is naive and risky. He probably didn't save enough capital for Ma Fei to play all his life. I didn't teach Ma Fei the knowledge of standing on the society well. This problem is realistic, but I have to face it. After all, if the screenwriter hadn't written Ma Fei's dream, Ma Fei might have been mediocre all his life.
? Looking up, after all, it is not a comedy movie. One second, he listened to the arrangement of the school and lived in the school to review the final exam. The next second, the father and son flew on the mound. Imagine the panic when the school found an existing student missing the next day. The starting point of this family education method is good, but it always brings trouble to the school. As Ma Fei's father, when he made up his mind, he didn't even discuss it with Ma Fei's mother. Sometimes I even think that it is reasonable for such a person who likes to let himself go, and the bridge he built collapsed. Unfortunately, the bridge collapsed, and he was really wronged. After careful exploration, maybe he wants to talk about some educational issues in this film, but his exploration of these issues is too superficial. Everyone knows that education is facing reform, but he didn't point out the direction of reform in the end. Faced with thousands of students in a school, it is impossible to teach Marek Haven at will. However, there is a saying in the movie that I quite agree with. Ma Haowen told the dean why students with poor grades were soon abandoned. Don't they have the right to education? Generally speaking, I always think that as a teacher, the most important thing to do is to treat everyone equally. At the very least, the distinction should not be too obvious. You shouldn't target a student because of your grades. The setting here may also be because the dean's staff are too joking. To be honest, there is no school. Besides, since the negative side of the film is the dean, shouldn't the dean's educational thought be changed after what happened to Ma Fei? In the end, the dean asked Ma Fei to give up interest and win glory for the school in Qingbei according to his original idea. At this moment, the dean still didn't realize that education was not for his personal honor in essence, and he had to say that the discussion about education in the movie was actually a failure.
? Generally speaking, you don't have to take words seriously when watching such movies, but if you have a lecture class in college, I might take it as the starting point of your speech. After all, I am the king of China drama, and I am the demon hhhh who has never let Pinocchio go in the lecture class.