Originally, exam-oriented education has completed its historical mission and should withdraw from the historical stage. However, due to our traditional customary forces and some inherent institutional mechanisms, this idea is still rampant in our educational position. It is an objective law that everything must die when it is alive. If the dying person is not allowed to die, its re-existence will inevitably have adverse consequences. We should expose this bad result to arouse more people's shock and reflection.
Consequence one: it has created an upstart who takes the exam-oriented education.
The nouveau riche disturbed the good reading market for students. When I was a student, I read more extracurricular books that I was interested in, which increased my knowledge in many aspects. But now I have provided students with all kinds of exercises, papers, test books and so on. Teachers force me to buy, parents take the initiative to buy, and students have to buy. As a result, students' interest in reading is obliterated, and they are caught in the ocean of all kinds of strange problems every day, which makes a few businessmen happy and makes most children hard.
Consequence 2: the educational thought of "lack of legs" has been created.
It is natural to get high marks in the exam, but the education for high marks under the exam-oriented education has become a reality. Students' moral character, self-cultivation, survival ability, self-reliance ability and other valuable knowledge related to children's life have been ignored, and the educational thought of "missing legs" will inevitably create "missing legs" children.
Consequence 3: A weird teacher was created and some students got high marks.
At present, the greatest achievement of the so-called famous teacher in some places is that his students are ranked first on average, and he has trained several top candidates in the college entrance examination. Few people say that he has successfully educated many students without a good education. In fact, such "famous teachers" only build their reputation on the pain of students' pursuit of scores, at the expense of students' other interests and all-round development, and at the expense of most students' scientific development needs. Such a famous teacher is really a strange teacher. They are famous for their high-scoring students and are addicted to editing exam guidance materials, which makes the originally prosperous exam-oriented materials market more colorful. It is better to have fewer such strange teachers, because they indirectly increase the burden on students.
Consequence 4: It has created a key school that cruelly squeezed the oil of students' wisdom.
At present, the so-called key schools are all schools with high enrollment rate. But one of the reasons for their high enrollment rate is to squeeze the oil of students' wisdom, sprinkle the oil of students' wisdom on textbooks and topics, and burn it fiercely. Coupled with a lot of time guarantee, they can't wait to squeeze the students dry. After the college entrance examination, students' wisdom and spirituality are on the verge of collapse.
Consequence five: created a "student score first" abnormal parents.
Parents are anxious about exam-oriented education, and their children's academic performance has become the top priority of the family, and it should also be included in the family's important economic expenditure plan. Students get good grades, everyone is happy, students get bad grades, punching and kicking, domestic violence is closely related to exam-oriented education, and even becomes the fuse of domestic violence.
Consequence 6: A lazy and greedy education manager is created, and the school work and teachers' level are evaluated by the students' achievements.
Although education administrators have to say that they want to do quality education, they still love exam-oriented education in their hearts. Doing a good job in exam-oriented education means doing a good job: taking scores as hard indicators and hard evidence, saving effort and doing a good job. How troublesome it is to engage in quality education. Second, some education administrators are making money for exam-oriented education: there are key schools when there are exams, and I, who manage schools, can turn power into commodities and human feelings, charge fees for various exams, and regard schools with high enrollment rates as my special power area.
Consequence 7: A grassroots educator who is physically and mentally exhausted has been created.
The most bitter thing about exam-oriented education is the current grassroots educators. Students should get good grades. Without good students, it's no use talking. On the one hand, the enrollment war is intensifying, and even they try their best to "buy" excellent students and "dig" candidates. On the other hand, ordinary non-key schools are fighting fatigue. Teachers work at full capacity during the day and work overtime at night. There are no weekends, fewer holidays, more illness, and a lover who is not a teacher at home is tired.
Consequence 8: A deformed student group has been created.
We have to admit that exam-oriented education has trained some elite students, but most of them have been squeezed into the water on this wooden bridge. In fact, this is normal, but sadly, people who fall into the water have never learned to swim, so they have to learn again in the water, wasting themselves, consuming their families and slowing down their personal development. Even those students who crossed the single-plank bridge, some of them were psychologically deformed in the process of squeezing the single-plank bridge, which laid a curse for their future development.
Consequence 9: A psychopathic teacher was created.
The most serious harm to teachers caused by exam-oriented education is psychology. It is said that "points are the lifeblood of students", and now "points are also the lifeblood of teachers". In some places, it is clearly stipulated that whoever has a low average score will be laid off. As a result, teachers are psychologically abnormal in the face of survival and do many things that go against teachers' normal psychology, such as telling students to carry forward the "Lei Feng spirit" during exams, and some even try their best to steal questions and drive away students who are not good at learning. Isn't this a teacher's psychopathy?
Consequence 10: It has caused a bad manpower pattern of shortage of skilled talents and surplus of theoretical talents in China.
At present, the shortage of skilled talents in China affects the quality development of the economy, which is to a great extent the evil result of exam-oriented education, because the traditional exam-oriented education is to advocate children to go to school, go to college, find a good job, sit in an office, be a big official and get married. Few people say that going to school can help them learn skills, develop their abilities and live a down-to-earth life. In this educational atmosphere, of course, few people learn professional skills and develop into skilled talents. Because Chinese college students only systematically take stock of the knowledge known by human beings without creativity, China spends a lot of foreign exchange to import outdated products and technologies (such as toxic plastic wrap) every year. The phenomenon that college students go back to technical schools in some areas now is really a good irony to exam-oriented education.