(Original title: Follow-up of the event notified by Polytechnic University: Vice President Zhu Dayong said that the school asked him to immediately review in writing)

He Gong University reported the incident: the vice president said that the school asked him to review it in writing.

Zhu Dayong, Vice President of Hefei University of Technology.

Zhu Dayong, vice president of Hefei University of Technology, has made the latest progress in reporting the president's fraud.

On the afternoon of August 5th, Zhu Dayong said in an interview with the newspaper in Hefei that after the reported incident was reported by the newspaper and other media, the Party Committee of Hefei University of Technology held a standing committee at 6 pm on August 4th. After the meeting, Lu Lin footballer, deputy secretary of the Party Committee of Hefei University of Technology and secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission, reported the opinions of the meeting on behalf of the Party Committee of Hefei University of Technology.

Zhu Dayong told the newspaper that Lu Lin footballer, on behalf of the Party Committee of the school, asked him to immediately review the contents and methods of written reports, immediately stop the dissemination, and immediately take the initiative to eliminate the negative impact. The above three points need to be completed within two days, otherwise it is suggested that the Ministry of Education deal with him seriously.

On the evening of August 5th, our reporter called Lu Lin footballer several times and sent short messages to verify the above contents. As of press time, Lu Lin footballer didn't answer the phone and didn't reply to the inquiry information.

In an interview with the newspaper, Zhu Dayong also pointed out that he did not participate in the Standing Committee held on the afternoon of August 4 for three reasons: First, Liang Liang, the president of the conference research, was reported, and he should not participate as a reporter; Second, avoid arguing with Liang Liang at the meeting; Third, the meeting may become his own "criticism meeting", and his participation is meaningless.

On the evening of August 5, the newspaper telephoned the person in charge of the Propaganda Department of the Party Committee of Hefei University of Technology about the theme, participants and results of the meeting. He said that the school's report on the incident was based on the notice released on the evening of August 4, and he had nothing more to publish.

According to the newspaper's previous report, from 2065438 to July 2006, Zhu Dayong reported to the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Academic Committee of Hefei University of Technology that Liangliang, the president of Hefei University of Technology, had "cheated" in the process of applying for the "Fourth National Award for Outstanding Principals in Education Reform and Innovation".

The main basis of Zhu Dayong's report is that Liang Liang became the president of the University of Technology in July, 20 15, but many of his award-winning achievements were his teaching and scientific research achievements before he became the president.

For example, Zhu Dayong said in the tip-off letter that the teaching achievement presided over by Comrade Liang Liang won the second prize of national teaching achievement in 20 14 (five other achievements were awarded in our school). Comrade Liang Liang won the teaching achievement award during his tenure as the executive dean of the School of Management of the University of Science and Technology of China. How to use the newspaper for the "Principal Award" as the president of Hefei University of Technology?

Regarding the statement that "five other achievements of our school won awards" in the application materials, Zhu Dayong said, "These achievements were also completed when Liangliang was not working at the University of Technology, and were recommended to national awards after winning provincial achievement awards. It was completed under the leadership of Zhu Dayong, the vice president in charge of teaching. Isn't this stealing other people's achievements? "

In response to Zhu Dayong's report, Hegong University responded through its official website on August 4th that the "Selection of Typical Cases of National Education Reform and Innovation" was a public welfare activity sponsored by China Education News and China Education News Network. The "National Outstanding Principal Award for Education Reform and Innovation" is one of the awards selected in this activity. Our school was recommended to participate in the 4th National Excellent Principal Selection and Excellent Principal Selection for Education Reform and Innovation. As the principal, Liang Liang was recommended to represent the school in the selection. No false contents were found in the application materials.

In an interview with the Beijing News reporter on the afternoon of August 5th, Liang Liang also said that the award-winning declaration mentioned by Zhu Dayong in the tip-off letter was declared by himself on behalf of He Gong University, and it was a job award. "We didn't take the initiative to declare, nor did we recommend ourselves. It was recommended by the relevant departments. This is a job behavior. "

In response to the school and Liangliang's statement, Zhu Dayong pointed out to the newspaper that if it was a job behavior, he could declare a collective award, but the school did not do so.

On the evening of August 5th, a reporter of this newspaper called Liang Liang about Zhu Dayong's problem. He didn't respond and suggested that the reporter call the school propaganda department. The Propaganda Department of the Party Committee of Hefei University of Technology said that there is nothing more to add at present, subject to the circular issued by the school on August 4.

Netease Source: paper net Editor: Wang Zhongzheng _B6828