Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - People have different views on the ranking of exam results in compulsory education. Why?
People have different views on the ranking of exam results in compulsory education. Why?
I remember when I was in primary school and middle school, I had to take two exams every semester, the mid-term exam and the final exam. Both exams should be ranked, and each class should publish the exam results in red paper. In the next few decades, school exams and score ranking have become a matter of course.

After the implementation of the "double drop" policy last year, the Ministry of Education stipulated that schools in the compulsory education stage should not publish their scores and rankings. The traditional practice that has been used for decades is no longer allowed. Why? People have different views on this.

Some people fully support that schools should not rank their grades in compulsory education. This is because: first, the grade ranking of compulsory education will lead to the involution of education. Although there were scores in the past, people's mentality was generally peaceful, the competition was not fierce, the "theater effect" was not obvious, and the involution of education was not serious. But then people paid more and more attention to education and achievement. We should not only look at our own achievements, but also look at the achievements of others. We should try our best to compete with others, and education is involved.

Second, it is not conducive to the learning and growth of some children. At any time, differences in students' grades are inevitable. Some children are gifted, have good educational resources and have good academic performance. However, some children are gifted and have average educational resources, and their academic performance is naturally unsatisfactory. In the face of fierce competition, if you rank by grades, it may cause great psychological pressure to children with poor grades, hurt their self-esteem, and even cause some children to break the jar.

Fully support the ranking of test scores. People who are in favor of ranking also have good reasons. First of all, we have been doing it for decades. Isn't it good to announce the ranking of students' grades after the exam? This is a good practice and should be continued.

Second, test scores help teachers and parents to master students' actual learning situation, find out students' shortcomings, so as to check and fill gaps, urge children to study hard and improve their grades. If the form of performance evaluation is adopted, neither teachers nor parents know how the children are learning. If you don't know the details, how can you catch your child's study?

Third, the ranking of grades can let children know their position in the class, which can encourage the advanced and spur the backward. And the ranking of grades is conducive to healthy competition among children. Without competition, there is no goal, without competition, there is no vitality, and without competition, there is no progress.

The teacher of "Three-foot Platform Singing All the Way" thinks that the past performance ranking is suitable for the past educational environment. Now that the educational environment has changed, since the education department has stipulated this, it is an arrangement based on a higher overall situation. At the present stage of compulsory education, there are indeed many disadvantages in school performance ranking, which are not only bad for children, but also make education involution more and more serious.

Finally, personal advice: children's growth is not achieved overnight. It takes three generations to make a gentleman. As long as we do a good job in children's learning and growth bit by bit, children will certainly become excellent children in the future. I don't know what you think of the grades of schools in compulsory education and what suggestions you have. Welcome to discuss and leave messages.