Parents want to get a degree by buying a school district for their children to receive a better education. In this way, education seems to be commercialized. In fact, I think education cannot be purely for two reasons:
First of all, education itself is for development.
In fact, education itself is for development, and the difference is for human development and social development. If education leaves the economic foundation, then there is no way to implement it better. Part of the purpose of education is to provide local talents and realize local economic development. Therefore, education itself is for development, so education naturally becomes less pure.
Second, education needs to be influenced in many ways.
The process of education itself needs to be influenced in many ways. If education can make local economy take off, naturally local economy will have more financial resources to invest in education. Only education funded by financial resources can have better educational resources to live in, which will naturally benefit teachers, students and parents.
The purpose of education itself is to cultivate people and help them realize their self-worth. In my opinion, all localities can implement some investment promotion plans for the purpose of education, and most of the proceeds are used for education itself to promote the cultivation of local talents. Only excellent talents can better promote local development, which is the correct virtuous circle. If we just blindly use education to make money, it will ultimately hurt the local government and people. Even if the investment is successful at that time, there will be great trouble in the future.