The "Notice on Paying Close Attention to the Implementation of the Spirit of the National Conference on Undergraduate Education in Colleges and Universities in the New Era" recently issued by the Ministry of Education clearly stipulates that the one-vote veto system of teachers' morality and style should be strictly implemented, and those who have lost their morality should be dealt with seriously according to the law. It can be seen that teachers in colleges and universities are not necessarily iron rice bowls. If they do something wrong, they may still be expelled from the teaching staff. In fact, there are many cases everywhere, and many people have violated them? Red line? As a result, 60% of university teachers were dismissed or their contracts were terminated.
All walks of life have their own moral standards, and teachers, civil servants and employees of enterprises must follow the corresponding moral standards. However, in many industries, a person's moral loss and anomie will be condemned, but under normal circumstances, it is rarely expelled from the industry team. Why is the teacher profession, especially in colleges and universities, so strict with teachers' professional ethics? Why do college teachers' moral demeanor deviate, and the consequences are so serious?
Because of the particularity of teachers' profession, especially in colleges and universities, it is even more special. Teachers in colleges and universities often teach young college students. In many cases, the anomie of teachers' morality is manifested as infringement on students, and its consequences are more serious than that of other industries. Compared with their own students, college teachers have asymmetric advantages. Generally speaking, students trust their teachers very much and it is often difficult to guard against malicious teachers. After being infringed, many students were even ashamed to stand up because of their previous respect and trust in the teacher.
It can be said that the serious consequences caused by the anomie of college teachers' teaching style and morality are often due to the abuse of their own identity advantages and teachers' authoritative advantages. In this case, of course, it is necessary to crack down severely and prevent teachers from contacting their students. In other industries, although there are similar situations, the relationship between colleagues and between superiors and subordinates is generally not such an asymmetric difference between teachers and students in colleges and universities.
How to treat the strict implementation of the one-vote veto system of teachers' morality and style by the Ministry of Education?