Reference answer
I think this view is quite right. Because "Punisher, with heart." The essence of education is to "correct their minds" and make them develop in an all-round way. Therefore, the reasonable exercise of teachers' disciplinary power is conducive to the healthy and all-round development of students.
Punishment is by no means equal to corporal punishment, let alone injury or psychological discrimination, but refers to a punishment method based on the principle that punishment makes the offender feel physical and mental pain, but does not harm the physical and mental health of the punished person.
Without discipline education, it is difficult for students to reason. It is impossible for students to grow up smoothly. When wandering at the crossroads, they need someone to guide, help, discipline and punish. The teacher is this person, and should be duty-bound to take the responsibility of punishing students, and let students understand that "everyone is responsible for their own actions" through timely and moderate punishment. In disciplinary education, students can distinguish between right and wrong, right and wrong, and understand rights and responsibilities.
Without discipline education, it is difficult for students to mature. It is incomplete to regard "appreciation education", "love education" and "emotion education" as the mainstream of primary and secondary education, and "discipline education" is also needed. If appreciation is sunshine, children can grow up confidently and happily in the sunshine of appreciation, then punishment is wind and rain, and children can learn to bear setbacks and be tempered in the wind and rain of punishment, so as to surpass themselves and mature.
As a teacher, we should treat this developing group-students with leniency and severity in the process of education, and give them appropriate rewards and punishments to help students grow up healthily.
My answer is over! thank you
I hope it helps you.