I think this policy is very good. I am also a parent, and my daughter is in the second grade of primary school. As a parent, I especially approve of this policy. There is a lot of homework at school, and my daughter is naturally active. It seems a little painful to spend most of my time doing my homework after school. Not only do children have a lot of homework, but class teachers also assign various homework to parents, such as explaining homework to children and correcting homework. Or give the child a question, let her finish it, and then send it to the class.
As a parent, I, or most parents, are like me. I have to go to work during the day, and I have all kinds of trivial things to deal with in my life. My energy is really limited. It's ok to tutor a child like this, and I'm afraid I can't take care of more children.
I think the country has also taken into account the demands of our young families, so it has such a policy. I am very much in favor of reducing the burden of education. I hope my daughter has a happy childhood, which is colorful, not just homework and study.
For those who haven't seen this policy, let me explain it in detail and attach some personal opinions.
First, the double-drop policy. Which double reduction policy is it? Simply put, it is mainly to reduce students' homework burden and suppress extracurricular training. The double reduction policy issued by the Ministry of Education clearly points out that schools should strictly implement the regulations on homework management and must not assign more homework to students or parents (parents can rest assured).
Don't use after-school service time to teach new lessons. Extracurricular training is now banned, and the current extracurricular training institutions are suppressed by the state, and the whole industry has been hit to pieces.
The policy also mentioned that key classes should not be set up in any name, and students should not be divided into classes, allocated seats or labeled according to the test results.
Seeing this, I thought of educational discrimination. Top students are always given preferential treatment, and the policy gives every student a fair educational opportunity.
Second, from the phenomenon, young people are reluctant to have more children. Why? I believe everyone knows the reason more or less.
First, because everyone is a "chicken baby", they are afraid that their baby will fall behind others and will not be able to enter key classes. They are afraid that they will not get a better education and that education is unfair, so they report to their babies for various training courses, except learning or learning.
Second, the education cost brought by "chicken baby" has become higher, and training institutions have sprung up. Young families can "make" a child with all their resources, and they can't afford to raise more, so young people choose to lie flat and don't want to have more children.
Population is the foundation of the country, and this country can't stand it. Any obstacles must be leveled, so the training institutions outside teaching are suppressed, the share prices of listed companies in the education industry have plummeted, and the whole industry has been beaten to pieces.
Then the policy was introduced, prohibiting the establishment of key classes, educational discrimination, after-school training, lightening students' homework and assigning homework to parents. All these are aimed at reducing the educational burden and giving every student a fair educational opportunity.
Third, in the end, you can always trust the country, which is our backing. This policy is very strong, showing the country's determination to solve the aging population, reduce the burden of education and reduce the burden on young people.
What do you think of this?